Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

DNA extraction affects metabarcoding success

ABSTRACT: DNA extraction with inhibitor removal outperforms more simple methods in DNA metabarcoding of homogenized unsorted bulk samples

PROVIDER: PRJEB26589 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR2561020_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2561020_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2561030_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2561030_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2561040_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 150

Similar Datasets

DNA Extraction

Project description:DNA extraction method targeted loci environmental

| PRJNA315949 | ENA

Performance of a highly scalable and extraction-free RNA-seq method

Project description:RNA-seq workflows have become progressively more efficient over time however, RNA extraction still remains a significant bottleneck. For small numbers of sample, highly efficient RNA extraction is simple to perform but becomes costly and laborious at the scale of hundreds of samples. Our prior work has demonstrated that qPCR can be accurately performed using bulk cells samples lysate instead of RNA extraction. We combined this method with the recently developed simple method for rapid RNA-seq library prep; Smart-3SEQ (Foley et al., 2019) and hypothesized that bulk RNA-seq can be performed in a multi-well plate format, and at low cost by performing RNA-seq library prep cDNA synthesis using in-lysate RNA followed by Smart-3SEQ. The result shows success of our approach in various levels: 1) all quality control measures were achieved, 2) Gene expression profiles, gene differential expression and the response patterns reported by in-lysate and purified RNA library highly correlate with each other, and 3) in-lysate RNA-seq library prep performed similar to the gold standard used here (Illumina Truseq) for DEG calling.

2021-01-22 | GSE164650 | GEO

Proteomic content in metabolomic samples cause post-extraction metabolite changes

Project description:Arising from efforts to improve extraction conditions for polar metabolomics, a proteomic landscape of over 1,000 proteins within metabolite extracts was discovered. This is a ubiquitous feature across several common extraction and sample types. A novel yet simple extraction workflow integrates 3kDa filtration for protein removal as a superior method for polar metabolomics.

2024-06-12 | MSV000095011 | MassIVE

PJI extraction optimization

Project description:Optimization of prosthetic joint infection sample DNA extraction for Nanopore sequencing

| PRJEB42910 | ENA

Negative and positive control samples - DNA extraction

Project description:References samples to the DNA extraction

| PRJEB39304 | ENA

DNA extraction from MX-80 bentonite

Project description:DNA extraction from natural and spiked MX 80 bentonite

| PRJEB29317 | ENA

Evaluation of extraction solvents for untargeted metabolomics analysis of enrichment reactor cultures performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR)

Project description:INTRODUCTION: The extraction solvent mixtures were optimized for untargeted metabolomics analysis of microbial communities from two laboratory scale activated sludge reactors performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR).OBJECTIVE: To develop a robust and simple analytical protocol to analyse microbial metabolomics from EBPR bioreactors.METHODS: Extra- and intra-cellular metabolites were extracted using five methods and analysed by ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS).RESULTS: The optimal extraction method was biomass specific and methanol:water (1:1 v/v) and methanol:chloroform:water (2:2:1 v/v) were chosen, respectively, for each of the two different bioreactors.CONCLUSION: Our approach provides direct surveys of the metabolic state of PAO-enriched EBPR communities, showing that extraction methods should be carefully tailored to the microbial community under study

2019-08-16 | MTBLS884 | MetaboLights

Environmental soil gDNA extraction

Project description:Environmental soil gDNA extraction

| PRJEB37921 | ENA

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

| PRJEB10820 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data