Project description:Adjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) is a standard regimen for HER2+ breast cancer. Dual HER2-blockade with lapatinib (L) and trastuzumab demonstrated significant activity in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. This study evaluates neoadjuvant TC plus trastuzumab (H) and/or lapatinib (L). This study demonstrated a similar pCR rate with TCH and TCHL and a lower rate of pCR with TCL. Treatment-related toxicity limited the ability for participants to receive protocol-specified chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy in the TCHL Arm.
Project description:Adjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH) is a standard regimen for HER2+ breast cancer. Dual HER2-blockade with lapatinib (L) and trastuzumab demonstrated significant activity in the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. This study evaluates neoadjuvant TC plus trastuzumab (H) and/or lapatinib (L). This study demonstrated a similar pCR rate with TCH and TCHL and a lower rate of pCR with TCL. Treatment-related toxicity limited the ability for participants to receive protocol-specified chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy in the TCHL Arm.
Project description:<p>This randomized phase III trial studies paclitaxel and trastuzumab with or without lapatinib to see how well they work in treating patients with stage II or stage III breast cancer that can be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Lapatinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving paclitaxel with trastuzumab and/or lapatinib before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. It is not yet known which regimen is more effective in treating patients with breast cancer.</p>
Project description:Targeting HER2 with lapatinib (L), trastuzumab (T), or the LT combination, is effective in HER2+ breast cancer (BC), but de novo and acquired resistance commonly occur. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the somatic alterations found in Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab resistant cells lines.
Project description:The CHER-LOB randomized phase II study showed that the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy increases the pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate as compared to chemotherapy plus either trastuzumab or lapatinib. An extensive biomarker programme was prospectively planned to identify potential predictors of sensitivity to different treatments and evaluate treatment effect on tumor biomarkers. A mutation in PIK3CA exon 20 or 9 was documented in 20% of the cases. Overall, the pCR rates were similar in PIK3CA wild type and PIK3CA mutated patients (33.3% vs 22.7%; p=0.323). However, for patients receiving trastuzumab plus lapatinib, the probability of pCR was higher in PIK3CA wild type tumors (48.4% vs 12.5%; p=0.06). Ki67, pAKT and apoptosis measured on the residual disease were significantly reduced from baseline. The degree of Ki67 inhibition was significantly higher in patients receiving the dual anti-HER2 blockade. In conclusion, PIK3CA mutations seem to identify patients less likely to benefit from dual anti-HER2 inhibition. p95-HER2 and markers of PI3K pathway deregulation are not confirmed as markers of different sensitivity to trastuzumab or lapatinib.
Project description:The CHER-LOB randomized phase II study showed that the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy increases the pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate as compared to chemotherapy plus either trastuzumab or lapatinib. An extensive biomarker programme was prospectively planned to identify potential predictors of sensitivity to different treatments and evaluate treatment effect on tumor biomarkers. A mutation in PIK3CA exon 20 or 9 was documented in 20% of the cases. Overall, the pCR rates were similar in PIK3CA wild type and PIK3CA mutated patients (33.3% vs 22.7%; p=0.323). However, for patients receiving trastuzumab plus lapatinib, the probability of pCR was higher in PIK3CA wild type tumors (48.4% vs 12.5%; p=0.06). Ki67, pAKT and apoptosis measured on the residual disease were significantly reduced from baseline. The degree of Ki67 inhibition was significantly higher in patients receiving the dual anti-HER2 blockade. In conclusion, PIK3CA mutations seem to identify patients less likely to benefit from dual anti-HER2 inhibition. p95-HER2 and markers of PI3K pathway deregulation are not confirmed as markers of different sensitivity to trastuzumab or lapatinib.
Project description:CALGB 40601 was activated as a 3-arm study (paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib [THL], paclitaxel + trastuzumab [TH] and paclitaxel + lapatinib [TL]). In December 2010, twoneoadjuvant studies were presented at the Cancer Therapy and Research Center-American Association for Cancer Research (CTRC-AACR) San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium that affected the scientific and practical enthusiasm for the TL arm. For this reason the CALGB 40601 has been amended to omit the TL treatment arm (arm 3). In the Geparquinto trial, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer received epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel combined either with trastuzumab (EC-DOC-H) or lapatinib (EC-DOC-L) neoadjuvantly, then trastuzumab for a total of 12 months adjuvantly [34]. Pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast and axilla was the primary endpoint. Among 620 patients randomized, there was a higher pCR rate (31% vs 22%) and lower toxicity with fewer discontinuations (10% vs 16%) among patients on the trastuzumab arm than the lapatinib arm. The first results of the NeoALTTO trial were similar [35]. Approximately 450 women with HER2-positive breast cancer received a lead-in phase of 6 weeks of biologic therapy withlapatinib (L), trastuzumab (H), or both, then paclitaxel was added for an additional 12 weeks prior to surgery. All drugs were given at doses similar to CALGB 40601. Postoperative adjuvant therapy included additional chemotherapy and biologic therapy, however, the presentation focused solely on the primary endpoint of pCR in the breast at surgery; no longterm outcomes were presented. There were more grade > 3 adverse events in the lapatinib arm compared with the trastuzumab arm, including diarrhea (23% vs 2%), hepatic abnormalities (13% vs 1%), and neutropenia (16% vs 3%). The only death occurred in the combined biologic (LH) arm. Failure to complete treatment as planned was higher in the L (34%) and LH arms (39%) that in the H arm (u%). PCR was highest with LH-paclitaxel (51%), followed by H-paclitaxel (30%), and L-paclitaxel (25%). Based on the inferior results and higher toxicity of the investigational lapatinib arms of these studies and in discussion with CTEP, in January 2011 it was decided to amend CALGB 40601 to omit Arm 3 (TL). Those patients on this arm will complete protocol therapy as perthe original study design. In CALGB 40601, it is recommended that all patients receive trastuzumab adjuvantly for 1 year, hence all of the patients including those previously randomized to the TL neoadjuvant arm, will be able to receive the known benefit of trastuzumab. After local IRB approval of Update #5, the remainder of the patients will be enrolled and randomized to Arm 1 (THL) and Arm 2 (TH) in a 2:1 fashion. Given that TH isthe standard regimen, and is also clearly the best tolerated, we will continue that arm of thestudy as the comparator, with THL as the only investigational arm.
Project description:We studied the effect on tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy of the substitution of lapatinib for trastuzumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide treatment, and of the addition of lapatinib and trastuzumab combined after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide treatment in patients with HER2-positive operable breast cancer to determine whether there would be a benefit of dual HER2 blockade in these patients.
