Homo sapiens
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA406918 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Identification and validation of single sample breast cancer radiosensitivity gene expression predictors
| PRJNA406914 | ENA
Project description:Purpose To develop a radiosensitivity gene expression assay to predict the response to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer. Patients and methods Fresh frozen primary tumors from 336 patients operated with BCS with or without RT were collected. Patients were split in a discovery cohort (N=172) and a validation cohort (N=164). Genes predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in an Illumina HT12 v4 whole transcriptome analysis were combined with genes from the literature (248 genes in total) to develop a targeted radiosensitivity assay on the Nanostring nCounter platform. Single sample predictors (SSPs) for IBTR based on a k-top scoring pairs algorithm were trained stratified for estrogen receptor (ER) status and RT. Two previously published profiles (radiosensitivity index, RSI, and radiosensitivity score, RSS) were also tested in our data Results The SSPs were prognostic for IBTR in ER+RT- patients (AUC 0.67, p=0.005), ER+RT- patients (AUC=0.89, p=0.015) and ER-RT+ patients (AUC=0.78, p<0.001). Among ER+ patients, radiosensitive tumors had an excellent effect of RT (p<0.001), while radioresistant tumors had no effect of RT (p=0.4) and a high risk of IBTR (55% at 10 years). Our SSPs developed in ER+ tumors and the RSS correlated with proliferation, while SSPs developed in ER- tumors correlated with immune response. RSI negatively correlated with both proliferation and immune response. Conclusions Our targeted SSPs were prognostic for IBTR and has the potential to stratify patients for RT. The biology behind models may explain the different performance in subgroups of breast cancer. Purpose To develop a radiosensitivity gene expression assay to predict the response to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer. Patients and methods Fresh frozen primary tumors from 336 patients operated with BCS with or without RT were collected. Patients were split in a discovery cohort (N=172) and a validation cohort (N=164). Genes predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in an Illumina HT12 v4 whole transcriptome analysis were combined with genes from the literature (248 genes in total) to develop a targeted radiosensitivity assay on the Nanostring nCounter platform. Single sample predictors (SSPs) for IBTR based on a k-top scoring pairs algorithm were trained stratified for estrogen receptor (ER) status and RT. Two previously published profiles (radiosensitivity index, RSI, and radiosensitivity score, RSS) were also tested in our data Results The SSPs were prognostic for IBTR in ER+RT- patients (AUC 0.67, p=0.005), ER+RT- patients (AUC=0.89, p=0.015) and ER-RT+ patients (AUC=0.78, p<0.001). Among ER+ patients, radiosensitive tumors had an excellent effect of RT (p<0.001), while radioresistant tumors had no effect of RT (p=0.4) and a high risk of IBTR (55% at 10 years). Our SSPs developed in ER+ tumors and the RSS correlated with proliferation, while SSPs developed in ER- tumors correlated with immune response. RSI negatively correlated with both proliferation and immune response. Conclusions Our targeted SSPs were prognostic for IBTR and has the potential to stratify patients for RT. The biology behind models may explain the different performance in subgroups of breast cancer.
2018-07-01 | GSE103745 | GEO
Project description:Purpose To develop a radiosensitivity gene expression assay to predict the response to adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer. Patients and methods Fresh frozen primary tumors from 336 patients operated with BCS with or without RT were collected. Patients were split in a discovery cohort (N=172) and a validation cohort (N=164). Genes predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in an Illumina HT12 v4 whole transcriptome analysis were combined with genes from the literature (248 genes in total) to develop a targeted radiosensitivity assay on the Nanostring nCounter platform. Single sample predictors (SSPs) for IBTR based on a k-top scoring pairs algorithm were trained stratified for estrogen receptor (ER) status and RT. Two previously published profiles (radiosensitivity index, RSI, and radiosensitivity score, RSS) were also tested in our data Results The SSPs were prognostic for IBTR in ER+RT- patients (AUC 0.67, p=0.005), ER+RT- patients (AUC=0.89, p=0.015) and ER-RT+ patients (AUC=0.78, p<0.001). Among ER+ patients, radiosensitive tumors had an excellent effect of RT (p<0.001), while radioresistant tumors had no effect of RT (p=0.4) and a high risk of IBTR (55% at 10 years). Our SSPs developed in ER+ tumors and the RSS correlated with proliferation, while SSPs developed in ER- tumors correlated with immune response. RSI negatively correlated with both proliferation and immune response. Conclusions Our targeted SSPs were prognostic for IBTR and has the potential to stratify patients for RT. The biology behind models may explain the different performance in subgroups of breast cancer.
2018-07-01 | GSE103744 | GEO
Project description:Identification and validation of single sample breast cancer radiosensitivity gene expression predictors [Illumina HT12 v4 data]
| PRJNA406920 | ENA
Project description:Custom NanoString Gene Expression Assay for Subtype Identification in Glioblastoma
| PRJNA737126 | ENA
Project description:Results: Normal tissue contamination caused misclassification of tumors in all predictors, but different breast cancer predictors showed different susceptibility to normal tissue bias. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PAM50 assay was improved by accounting for normal tissue. Conclusions: Normal tissue sampled concurrently with tumor tissue is an important source of bias in genomic predictors. Adjustments for normal tissue contamination could improve the application of breast cancer genomic predictors in both research and in clinical settings. Reference x breast tumor samples.
2011-07-18 | E-GEOD-22384 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Results: Normal tissue contamination caused misclassification of tumors in all predictors, but different breast cancer predictors showed different susceptibility to normal tissue bias. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PAM50 assay was improved by accounting for normal tissue. Conclusions: Normal tissue sampled concurrently with tumor tissue is an important source of bias in genomic predictors. Adjustments for normal tissue contamination could improve the application of breast cancer genomic predictors in both research and in clinical settings.
2011-07-19 | GSE22384 | GEO
Project description:Proteogenomics approaches often struggle with the distinction between right and false peptide-to-spectrum matches as the database size enlarges. However, features extracted from tandem mass spectrometry intensity predictors can enhance the peptide identification rate and can provide extra confidence for spectral matching in a proteogenomic context. To that end, features from the spectral intensity pattern predictors MS2PIP and Prosit were combined with the canonical scores from MaxQuant in the Percolator post-processing tool for protein databases constructed from RNA-seq and ribosome profiling analyses. The presented results provide evidence that this approach enhances the peptide identification power in a proteogenomic setting and in the meantime they lead to the validation of new proteoforms with elevated stringency. In this online repository, we submitted the conventional proteomic search results with MaxQuant against the custom nanopore RNA-seq-based search space. All other results can be found in the supplemental materials of the manuscript, in SRA (sequencing data) or under ProteomeXChange Project PXD011353 (as this is original data from a previuos paper).
2021-03-26 | PXD022280 | Pride
Project description:Transcription profiling by NanoString nCounter of primary breast tumors from 1219 patients from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) using the NanoString nCounter platform and normalized with NanoString nSolver software. The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility, and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization, and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation more reliably than the NanoString commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multi-phase or multi-site cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that preprocessing of gene expression data is an important component of study design. The normalized data here is processed through the RUVSeq-based iterative framework
2020-07-16 | GSE148418 | GEO
Project description:Transcription profiling by NanoString nCounter of primary breast tumors from 1219 patients from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) using the NanoString nCounter platform and normalized with a RUVSeq-based iterative framework. The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility, and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization, and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation more reliably than the NanoString commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multi-phase or multi-site cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that preprocessing of gene expression data is an important component of study design. The normalized data here is processed through the RUVSeq-based iterative framework
2020-07-16 | GSE148425 | GEO