Hyperacetylated Chromatin Domains Mark Cell Type-Specific Genes and Suggest Distinct Modes of Enhancer Function
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA545995 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR9189070.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR9189071.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR9189072.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR9189063.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR9189073.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Stratification of enhancers by relative signal strength in ChIP-seq assays has resulted in the establishment of “super-enhancers” as a widespread and useful tool for identifying cell type-specific, highly expressed genes and associated pathways. We have examined a distinct method of stratification that focuses on peak breadth, and use it to classify broad regions exhibiting histone modifications associated with gene activation as “hyperacetylated chromatin domains” (HCDs). We find that application of this analysis to multiple datasets serves to identify genes that are both more highly expressed and more closely aligned to cell identity than “super-enhancer” analysis does. Moreover, genetic manipulations of selected gene loci suggest that at least some HCDs harbor enhancers that work by distinct mechanisms, and in turn reveal that the “super-enhancer” concept can obscure important functions of constituent elements.
2020-02-28 | GSE132130 | GEO
Project description:Stratification of enhancers by signal strength in ChIP-seq assays has resulted in the establishment of super-enhancers as a widespread and useful tool for identifying cell type-specific, highly expressed genes and associated pathways. We examine a distinct method of stratification that focuses on peak breadth, termed hyperacetylated chromatin domains (HCDs), which classifies broad regions exhibiting histone modifications associated with gene activation. We find that this analysis serves to identify genes that are both more highly expressed and more closely aligned to cell identity than super-enhancer analysis does using multiple data sets. Moreover, genetic manipulations of selected gene loci suggest that some enhancers located within HCDs work at least in part via a distinct mechanism involving the modulation of histone modifications across domains and that this activity can be imported into a heterologous gene locus. In addition, such genetic dissection reveals that the super-enhancer concept can obscure important functions of constituent elements.
| S-EPMC7486385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genomic enhancers are key transcriptional regulators which, upon the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors, can activate their cognate promoter. Although enhancers have been extensively studied in isolation, a substantial number of genes have more than one simultaneously active enhancer, and it remains unclear how these distinct elements cooperate to regulate transcription. In this work, we report that developmental enhancers – that regulate tissue-specific genes – and housekeeping enhancers rely on distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity: while developmental enhancers are synergistic, housekeeping enhancers are additive (meaning that their combined activity mirrors the sum of their individual activities). Developmental enhancer synergy is promiscuous in our system and is not associated with specific combinations of transcription factors. However, developmental transcription factors globally contain higher fraction of intrinsically disordered domains, which might support such synergistic interactions.
2024-09-05 | GSE245033 | GEO
Project description:DNA methylation is essential for embryonic and neuronal differentiation, but the function of most genomic DNA methylation marks are poorly understood. Generally the human genome is highly methylated (>70%) except for CpG islands and gene promoters. However, it was recently shown that the IMR90 human fetal lung fibroblast cells have large regions of the genome with partially methylated domains (PMDs, <70% average methylation), in contrast to the rest of the genome which is in highly methylated domains (HMDs, >70% average methylation). Using bisulfite conversion followed by high-throughput sequencing (MethylC-seq), we discovered that human SH-SY5Y neuronal cells also contain PMDs. We developed a novel hidden Markov model (HMM) to computationally map the genomic locations of PMDs in both cell types and found that autosomal PMDs can be over 9 Mb in length and cover 41% of the IMR90 genome and 19% of the SH-SY5Y genome. Genomic regions marked by cell line specific PMDs contain genes that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, with PMDs being a mark of repressed transcription. Genes contained within N-HMDs (neuronal HMDs, defined as a PMD in IMR90 but HMD in SH-SY5Y) were significantly enriched for calcium signaling, synaptic transmission and neuron differentiation functions. Autism candidate genes were enriched within PMDs and the largest PMD observed in SH-SY5Y cells marked a 10 Mb cluster of cadherin genes with strong genetic association to autism. Our results suggest that these large-scale methylation domain maps could be relevant to interpreting and directing future investigations into the elusive etiology of autism. Examined DNA methylation in a human neuronal cell line and cerebral cortex
2011-06-23 | E-GEOD-25930 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:DNA methylation is essential for embryonic and neuronal differentiation, but the function of most genomic DNA methylation marks are poorly understood. Generally the human genome is highly methylated (>70%) except for CpG islands and gene promoters. However, it was recently shown that the IMR90 human fetal lung fibroblast cells have large regions of the genome with partially methylated domains (PMDs, <70% average methylation), in contrast to the rest of the genome which is in highly methylated domains (HMDs, >70% average methylation). Using bisulfite conversion followed by high-throughput sequencing (MethylC-seq), we discovered that human SH-SY5Y neuronal cells also contain PMDs. We developed a novel hidden Markov model (HMM) to computationally map the genomic locations of PMDs in both cell types and found that autosomal PMDs can be over 9 Mb in length and cover 41% of the IMR90 genome and 19% of the SH-SY5Y genome. Genomic regions marked by cell line specific PMDs contain genes that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, with PMDs being a mark of repressed transcription. Genes contained within N-HMDs (neuronal HMDs, defined as a PMD in IMR90 but HMD in SH-SY5Y) were significantly enriched for calcium signaling, synaptic transmission and neuron differentiation functions. Autism candidate genes were enriched within PMDs and the largest PMD observed in SH-SY5Y cells marked a 10 Mb cluster of cadherin genes with strong genetic association to autism. Our results suggest that these large-scale methylation domain maps could be relevant to interpreting and directing future investigations into the elusive etiology of autism.
2011-06-23 | GSE25930 | GEO
Project description:Chromatin domains and their associated structures must be faithfully inherited through cellular division to maintain cellular identity. Yet, accessing the localized strategies preserving chromatin domain inheritance, specifically the transfer of parental, pre-existing nucleosomes with their associated post-translational modifications (PTMs) during DNA replication is challenging in living cells. We devised an inducible, proximity-dependent labeling system to irreversibly mark replication-dependent H3.1 and H3.2 histone-containing nucleosomes at single desired loci in mouse embryonic stem cells such that their fate after DNA replication could be followed. Strikingly, repressed chromatin domains are preserved through the local re-deposition of parental nucleosomes. In contrast, nucleosomes decorating active chromatin domains do not exhibit such preservation. Notably, altering cell fate leads to an adjustment in the positional inheritance of parental nucleosomes that reflects the corresponding changes in chromatin structure. These findings point to important mechanisms that contribute to parental nucleosome segregation to preserve cellular identity.
2019-10-31 | GSE136245 | GEO
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE13863: Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa (Nimblegen) GSE19889: Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa (Illumina) Refer to individual Series
2010-05-16 | E-GEOD-19892 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RBFOX2 controls the splicing of a large number of transcripts implicated in cell differentiation and development. Parsing RNA-binding protein datasets, we uncover that RBFOX2 can interact with hnRNPC, hnRNPM and SRSF1 to regulate splicing of a broad range of splicing events using different sequence motifs and binding modes. Using immunoprecipitation, specific RBP knockdown, RNA-seq and splice-sensitive PCR, we show that RBFOX2 can target splice sites using three binding configurations: single, multiple or secondary modes. In the single binding mode RBFOX2 is recruited to its target splice sites through a single canonical binding motif, while in the multiple binding mode RBFOX2 binding sites include the adjacent binding of at least one other RNA binding protein partner. Finally, in the secondary binding mode RBFOX2 likely does not bind the RNA directly but is recruited to splice sites lacking its canonical binding motif through the binding of one of its protein partners. These dynamic modes bind distinct sets of transcripts at different positions and distances relative to alternative splice sites explaining the heterogeneity of RBFOX2 targets and splicing outcomes.
2021-06-23 | GSE140679 | GEO
Project description:Distinct modes of cell competition shape mammalian tissue morphogenesis
| PRJNA526869 | ENA
Project description:Transcription termination determines the ends of transcriptional units and thereby ensures integrity of gene regulation. Here we perform genome-wide investigation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription termination in Caenorhabditis elegans and observe two distinct modes of termination. Whereas a subset of genes requires the exoribonuclease XRN2, a known termination factor, termination of other genes appears independent of, and refractory to, XRN2. Unexpectedly, promoters instruct the choice of termination mode, but XRN2-independent termination additionally requires a compatible region downstream of the 3’ end cleavage site. Hence, different termination mechanisms may affect different configurations of Pol II complexes dictated by promoters.
2018-02-05 | GSE97775 | GEO