Project description:Comprehensive gene expression assessment in prenatal DS lungs (n=19), and age-matched non-DS (n=19), was performed using high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNAseq)
Project description:RATIONALE: Studying the genes expressed in samples of tissue from patients with cancer may help doctors identify biomarkers related to cancer.
PURPOSE: This laboratory study is using gene expression profiling to evaluate normal tissue and tumor tissue from patients with colon cancer that has spread to the liver, lungs, or peritoneum.
Project description:Gene expression profiling (GEP) can reveal characteristic signatures associated with distinct biologic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We performed GEP on Down syndrome (DS) and comparison non-Down syndrome (NDS) ALL cases to identify biologic differences between these groups.
Project description:Gene expression profiling (GEP) can reveal characteristic signatures associated with distinct biologic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We performed GEP on Down syndrome (DS) and comparison non-Down syndrome (NDS) ALL cases to identify biologic differences between these groups. Ficoll-enriched, cryopreserved diagnostic bone marrow samples were obtained from patients with newly diagnosed B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Project description:Background: Down syndrome is the most common genetic cause of mental retardation in humans, occurring in ~1 in 800 newborns. It is caused by chromosome 21 trisomy. Disruption of the phenotype is thought to be the result of gene dosage imbalance. The aim of the study was to classify chromosome 21 genes according to their level of expression in Down syndrome. Results: Variations in chromosome 21 gene expression were analyzed in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from 10 Down syndrome patients and 11 control individuals. Of the 359 genes and predictions displayed on a specifically designed high content chromosome 21 oligoarray, 132 genes were expressed in lymphoblastoid cell lines. By using a powerful statistical analysis, 58 genes were found overexpressed and 42 unchanged in cell lines from Down syndrome patients. Microarray data were validated by quantitative PCR on 10 genes. Conclusions: The 132 chromosome 21 genes expressed by derived lymphoblastoid cell lines were classified into four categories: Class I: 24 genes controlled by the gene dosage effect with an increase in expression in Down syndrome between 1.4 and 1.6; Class II: 14 amplified genes with expression ratio above 1.6; Class III: 32 compensated genes with expression ratio between 0.82 to 1.4 and Class IV: 30 genes with high variability between individuals. Class I and II genes are likely to be involved in the Down syndrome phenotype, in contrast to the compensated Class III genes; Class IV genes could account for the variable phenotypes observed in patients. Keywords: HSA21 gene expression in Down syndrome