Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Signatures for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality, part 1 of 5


ABSTRACT: Logistic regression classification models were fit to manually classified quality control (QC) LC-MS/MS datasets to develop a model that can predict whether a dataset is in or out of control. Model parameters were optimized by minimizing a loss function that accounts for the tradeoff between false positive and false negative errors. In addition to the 1152 training/testing datasets, we are including 2662 additional datasets, all of the same QC sample (whole cell lysate of Shewanella oneidensis). Datasets originate from 6 Thermo instrument platforms: Exactive, LTQ, VelosPro, Orbitrap, Q-Exactive, and Velos Orbitrap.

INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ XL ETD, LTQ, LTQ Velos

ORGANISM(S): Shewanella Oneidensis (strain Mr-1)

SUBMITTER: Matthew Monroe  

LAB HEAD: Matthew Monroe

PROVIDER: PXD000320 | Pride | 2013-10-03

REPOSITORIES: Pride

altmetric image

Publications


Ensuring data quality and proper instrument functionality is a prerequisite for scientific investigation. Manual quality assurance is time-consuming and subjective. Metrics for describing liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) data have been developed; however, the wide variety of LC-MS instruments and configurations precludes applying a simple cutoff. Using 1150 manually classified quality control (QC) data sets, we trained logistic regression classification models to predict whether a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2013-10-03 | PXD000321 | Pride
2013-10-04 | PXD000323 | Pride
2013-10-04 | PXD000322 | Pride
2013-10-04 | PXD000324 | Pride
2023-09-04 | GSE241900 | GEO
2023-09-01 | PXD045065 |
2015-12-03 | MSV000079409 | MassIVE
2019-03-23 | GSE128739 | GEO
| PRJNA700650 | ENA
| PRJNA185663 | ENA