Yeast - phosphoproteome - Yeast PP4 Interacts with ATR Homolog Ddc2-Mec1 and Regulates Checkpoint Signaling
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ Orbitrap Velos
ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (baker's Yeast)
TISSUE(S): Cell Culture
SUBMITTER: 
Ragna Sack
LAB HEAD: Susan M Gasser
PROVIDER: PXD001492 | Pride | 2015-01-12
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131114_1981-1_3uL.raw | Raw | |||
| 131114_1981-2_3uL.raw | Raw | |||
| 131114_1981-3_3uL.raw | Raw | |||
| 131115_7373-1_3uL.raw | Raw | |||
| 131115_7373-2_3uL.raw | Raw |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 17 |
Publications
Yeast PP4 interacts with ATR homolog Ddc2-Mec1 and regulates checkpoint signaling.
Hustedt Nicole N Seeber Andrew A Sack Ragna R Tsai-Pflugfelder Monika M Bhullar Bhupinder B Vlaming Hanneke H van Leeuwen Fred F Guénolé Aude A van Attikum Haico H Srivas Rohith R Ideker Trey T Shimada Kenji K Gasser Susan M SM
Molecular cell 20141218 2
Mec1-Ddc2 (ATR-ATRIP) controls the DNA damage checkpoint and shows differential cell-cycle regulation in yeast. To find regulators of Mec1-Ddc2, we exploited a mec1 mutant that retains catalytic activity in G2 and recruitment to stalled replication forks, but which is compromised for the intra-S phase checkpoint. Two screens, one for spontaneous survivors and an E-MAP screen for synthetic growth effects, identified loss of PP4 phosphatase, pph3Δ and psy2Δ, as the strongest suppressors of mec1-10 ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Yeast sensor checkpoint kinase Mec1 is phosphorylated at Ser1991 upon HU replication stress. The phospho-accepter mutant (mec1-S1991A) confers HU sensitivity and synthetic sickness with the mutants that aggravate replication and transcription collision. To understand how the entire chromatin proteome (chromatome) responds to replication stress, we first investigated the global chromatin-bound proteins in S-phase yeast cells in the presence and absence of HU. Second, we performed phospho-proteome analysis in wild-type and mec1-S1991A mutant to find the S1991-phospho-dependent targets of Mec1 in the presence and absence of HU. Samples were duplicated in chromatome and triplicated in phospho-proteome analysis.
2021-09-28 | PXD027337 | Pride
Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs. We queried the yeast genome for DSBs after cells were treated with 200 mM hydroxyurea during S phase. Samples were collected from 1) cells synchronized in G1 phase by alpha factor; 2) cells released from G1 into medium containing 200 mM hydroxyurea for 1 h; 3) cells recovering in fresh medium without hydroxyurea for 1 h after the 1 h exposure to HU. These samples are referred to as G1, HU 1h, and R 1h, respectively. The strains from which the samples were collected are indicated following the time point, e.g. G1_MEC1 or R 1h_mec1. The experiment with mec1 was done twice (Experiments A and B) and that with MEC1 was done once (Experiment C). In addition, a control experiment of in vitro digestion with BamHI using the G1_mec1 sample (G1_BamHI) was performed.
2015-01-12 | E-GEOD-58808 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs. We queried the yeast genome for gene expression after cells were treated with 200 mM hydroxyurea during S phase. Samples were collected from 1) cells synchronized in G1 phase by alpha factor; 2) cells released from G1 into medium containing 200 mM hydroxyurea for 1 h; 3) cells recovering in fresh medium without hydroxyurea for 30 and 60 min after the 1 h exposure to HU. These samples are referred to as G1, HU 1h, R30, and R60, respectively. The strains from which the samples were collected are indicated before the time point, e.g. mec1_G1 or MEC1_R30. Stranded mRNA libraries were prepared according to manufacturer's suggestion and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq with paired-end reads of 75 bp.
2015-01-12 | E-GEOD-63516 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs.
2015-01-12 | GSE63516 | GEO
Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs.
2015-01-12 | GSE58808 | GEO
Project description:The Mec1/ATR kinase coordinates multiple cellular responses to replication stress. In addition to its canonical role in activating the checkpoint kinase Rad53, Mec1 also plays checkpoint-independent roles in genome maintenance that are not well understood. Here we employed a combined genetic-phosphoproteomic approach to manipulate Mec1 activation and globally monitor Mec1 signaling, allowing us to delineate distinct checkpoint-independent modes of Mec1 action. Using cells in which endogenous Mec1 activators were genetically ablated, we found that expression of “free” Mec1 Activation Domains (MADs) can robustly activate Mec1 and rescue the severe DNA replication and growth defects of these cells back to wild-type levels. However, unlike the activation mediated by endogenous activator-proteins, “free” MADs are unable to stimulate Mec1-mediated suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), revealing that Mec1’s role in genome maintenance is separable from a previously unappreciated pro-replicative function. Both Mec1’s functions in promoting replication and suppressing GCRs are independent of the downstream checkpoint kinases. Additionally, Mec1-dependent GCR suppression seems to require localized Mec1 action at DNA lesions, which correlates with the phosphorylation of activator-proximal substrates involved in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair. These findings establish that Mec1 initiates checkpoint signaling, promotes DNA replication, and maintains genetic stability through distinct modes of action.
2019-01-14 | PXD009734 | Pride
Project description:Different types of DNA damage can initiate phosphorylation-mediated signalling cascades that result in stimulus specific pro- or anti-apoptotic cellular responses. Amongst its many roles, the NF-κB transcription factor RelA is central to the DNA damage response pathway. Yet, understanding of the co-ordinated signalling mechanisms that result in these different DNA damaging agents inducing specific cellular outcomes through RelA remains unclear. Here, we examine the temporal effects of exposure of U2OS cells to either etoposide (ETO) or hydroxyurea (HU) on the phosphorylation status of RelA and its protein binding partners, using label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics. Although there were relatively few stimulus specific differences overall in the phosphorylated RelA interactome in response to either DNA damaging agent, we observed subtle, but significant changes in the phosphorylation states of the RelA bound proteins as a function of both the type of and duration of the DNA damaging agent used. The DNA double strand break (DSB) inducing ETO invoked more rapid, sustained responses than HU, with regulated targets primarily involved in transcription, cell division and (unsurprisingly) DSB repair. Kinase substrate prediction of confident, differentially regulated phosphosites suggests possible roles for CDK1 and MAPK3/ERK1 signaling, in addition to the known roles of ATM/ATR. In contrast, HU-induced replicative stress mediated more temporally dynamic regulation, with phosphoprotein components of the RelA network having known roles in rRNA/mRNA processing and translational initiation, many of which contained a 14-3-3ε binding motif. Our data thus point to differential regulation of key cellular processes and the involvement of unique signalling pathways in modulating DNA damage-specific functions of RelA.
2021-09-09 | PXD019589 | Pride
Project description:Different types of DNA damage can initiate phosphorylation-mediated signalling cascades that result in stimulus specific pro- or anti-apoptotic cellular responses. Amongst its many roles, the NF-κB transcription factor RelA is central to the DNA damage response pathway. Yet, understanding of the co-ordinated signalling mechanisms that result in these different DNA damaging agents inducing specific cellular outcomes through RelA remains unclear. Here, we examine the temporal effects of exposure of U2OS cells to either etoposide (ETO) or hydroxyurea (HU) on the phosphorylation status of RelA and its protein binding partners, using label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics. Although there were relatively few stimulus specific differences overall in the phosphorylated RelA interactome in response to either DNA damaging agent, we observed subtle, but significant changes in the phosphorylation states of the RelA bound proteins as a function of both the type of and duration of the DNA damaging agent used. The DNA double strand break (DSB) inducing ETO invoked more rapid, sustained responses than HU, with regulated targets primarily involved in transcription, cell division and (unsurprisingly) DSB repair. Kinase substrate prediction of confident, differentially regulated phosphosites suggests possible roles for CDK1 and MAPK3/ERK1 signaling, in addition to the known roles of ATM/ATR. In contrast, HU-induced replicative stress mediated more temporally dynamic regulation, with phosphoprotein components of the RelA network having known roles in rRNA/mRNA processing and translational initiation, many of which contained a 14-3-3ε binding motif. Our data thus point to differential regulation of key cellular processes and the involvement of unique signalling pathways in modulating DNA damage-specific functions of RelA.
2021-09-09 | PXD019587 | Pride
Project description:DNA replication is initiated at multiple sites or origins enriched with AT-rich sequences at various times during the S-phase. While current studies of genome-wide DNA replication profiles have focused on the timing of replication and the location of origins, the efficiency of replication/firing at various origins remains unclear. In this study, we show different efficiencies of DNA replication at various loci by using ORF-specific DNA microarrays. DNA copy-number increases as a function of time at individual loci are approximated to near-sigmoidal models for estimation of replication initiation and completion timings in HU-challenged cells. Duplicating times (from initiation to completion) vary from loci to loci, partly contributing to various firing efficiencies at origins. DNA replication timing profiles are strikingly similar to the reported patterns of enriched ssDNA, suggesting that majority stalled forks are restored for resumption of DNA replication. Although the DNA replication timing profiles are disrupted in HU-challenged cds1? cells, ~85% of potential origins overlapped with those found in wild type cells, significantly, most of which represents inefficiently fired origins in wild type cells. Together, our result indicates that replication checkpoint plays a role in monitoring efficient origins and thus maintaining global DNA replication patterns in HU-challenged cells. Keywords: WT or Cds1 HU synchronized cells released in HU free media and harvested at different time points vs WT or Cds1 synchronized with HU for 3 hrs. We analyzed 32 arrays for WT and 38 arrays for Cds1 cells which were synchronized with HU and released in HU free media and harvested at different time points. At least two biological repeats were done for each time points.
2007-08-14 | E-GEOD-6977 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:12 genome-wide microarrays to investigate the Tetrahymena thermophila gene expression changes in TRX1 and EZL2 gene knockout and hydroxyurea (HU) treatment conditions. For the TRR1 knockout (KO) condition, wild type (WT427) cells and TRX1 KO cells were cultured using 1XSPP, 30 degrees, 100 rpm shaking, until 350,000 cells/ml. For the EZL21 knockout (KO) condition, wild type (WT427) cells and EZL2 KO cells were cultured using 1XSPP, 30 degrees, 100 rpm shaking, until 350,000 cells/ml. For the HU treatment condition, HU was used to treat the WT427 cells for 48 hours, setting wild type (WT427) as the control; cells were cultured using 1XSPP, 30 degrees, 100 rpm shaking. Each sample has two biological replicates.
2013-09-04 | E-GEOD-44990 | biostudies-arrayexpress