Dataset Information

Comprehensive understanding the molecular components of LTBR signalling complex in cancers

ABSTRACT: Lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTBR), a member of TNFRSF, was identified as a key regulator in the development, organization, and homeostasis of lymphoid tissues (Wolf, Seleznik, Zeller, & Heikenwalder, 2010). Recently, LTBR has been shown to play a role in tumor biology, both in solid tumors and in hematological cancers (Fernandes et al., 2016; Haybaeck et al., 2009; Lo et al., 2007). However, the role of LTBR in cancer biology is still controversial. From the perspective of tumor eradication, the combination of LIGHT and IFN-g can induce apoptotic cell death in HT29 cells and some other cell lines via the increase of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Chang, Chao, Hsieh, & Lin, 2004; Zhang, Liu, Demchik, Zhai, & Yang, 2004). Artificial LTBR agonist was shown to induce tumor necrosis and decrease tumor burden in vivo in colon cancer or melanoma. (Hu et al., 2013), while recent studies revealed that LTBR mediated tumor progression, triggered by either LTα1b2 or LIGHT stimulation, leads to the recruitment of more infiltrating immune cells and the secretion of pro-survival inflammatory cyto-/chemokines (Ware, 2005). From this, the aim of the project is to compare the signalling changes between WT cells and HOIP absent Hep3B cells using a moTAP tagged LIGHT ligand. This ligand was pulled down by Flag IP, followed by Strep-tactin IP to explore the LTBR signalling complex with and without LUBAC. The result from this experiment would provide an unbiased picture of components of the LTBR-SC, also pointing out the differences between canonical NF-kB pathway and noncanonical Nf-kB pathway.

INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Hepatocyte, Cell Culture

SUBMITTER: Silvia Surinova

LAB HEAD: Silvia Surinova

PROVIDER: PXD034142 | Pride | 2025-04-01

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Publications

LUBAC enables tumor-promoting LTβ receptor signaling by activating canonical NF-κB.

Chen Yu-Guang YG Rieser Eva E Bhamra Amandeep A Surinova Silvia S Kreuzaler Peter P Ho Meng-Hsing MH Tsai Wen-Chiuan WC Peltzer Nieves N de Miguel Diego D Walczak Henning H

Cell death and differentiation 20240830 10

Lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR), a member of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFR-SF), is essential for development and maturation of lymphoid organs. In addition, LTβR activation promotes carcinogenesis by inducing a proinflammatory secretome. Yet, we currently lack a detailed understanding of LTβR signaling. In this study we discovered the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) as a previously unrecognized and functionally crucial component of the native LTβR signaling complex (LTβR-SC). ...[more]

PMID: 39215104

Shared Molecules

Only show the datasets with similarity scores above: 0.5

Threshold

0.5

Similar Datasets

Project description:Humans are exposed to a wide range of exogenous and endogenous alkylating agents, including agents frequently used as cytostatic drugs in cancer treatment (Drablos, Feyzi et al. 2004). Alkylating agents are mutagenic and cytotoxic and the major body of research has focused on their effects upon DNA. Less is known about the cellular consequences of alkylation to RNA, proteins and lipids, although such damage is likely quantitatively dominating due to the mere abundance of these macromolecules. DNA and RNA can be alkylated by SN1 and SN2 alkylating agents and alkylation occurs at nucleophilic O and N-atoms in the nucleosides as well as at O atoms in the phosphodiester bonds (Shooter, Howse et al. 1974, Sedgwick 2004). While alkylation at the O atoms in the nucleobases (O6G, O4T and O2C) are not affected by their hydrogen bonding, N1A and N3C contain an electron pair involved in hydrogen bonding. Alkylation at these nitrogens are thus more frequent in RNA and single-stranded DNA than in double stranded DNA (Bodell and Singer 1979). To cope with genomic damage inflicted by alkylating agents, a set of complex signal transduction pathways and DNA repair enzymes, collectively called the DNA damage response (DDR) is essential. The DDR senses the DNA damage and starts a highly choreographed response in order to resolve DNA damage or -replication issues (Ciccia and Elledge 2010). Specific repair mechanisms also exist to repair alkylated RNA (Aas, Otterlei et al. 2003, Wurtmann and Wolin 2009), although the biological significance of such repair yet remains elusive. Nevertheless, alkylation damage has been shown to alter the base-pairing properties of RNA bases and can interfere with tRNA-rRNA (Yoshizawa, Fourmy et al. 1999) as well as mRNA-tRNA (Ougland, Zhang et al. 2004){Hudson, 2015 #259}. Likely, other RNA functions that relies on base pairing might also be affected by alkylation damage, e.g. the correct folding of tRNAs and the function of miRNAs. Alkylation of mRNA may also affect translation indirectly by affecting binding affinities to RNA binding proteins (RBPs), as recently demonstrated for 6-meA. This enzymatically induced modification promotes binding of the 6-maA reader proteins YTHDF1 and 2 . While YTHDF2 reduces the stability of 6-maA modified transcripts (Wang, Lu et al. 2014), YTHDF1 actively promotes protein synthesis by interacting with the translation machinery (Wang, Zhao et al. 2015). To what degree alkylation damage to mRNA may promote similar effects by modulating translation remains, however, to be investigated. Interestingly, several studies have identified RBPs as important players in the DDR (Beli, Lukashchuk et al. 2012, Jungmichel, Rosenthal et al. 2013). Here, RBPs appear to have three major roles: 1) regulate gene expression at both the transcriptional- and post-transcriptional level (Keene and Tenenbaum 2002, Glisovic, Bachorik et al. 2008, Rinn and Chang 2012), 2) prevent formation of R-loops (Skourti-Stathaki and Proudfoot 2014), and 3) participate directly in DNA repair (Montecucco and Biamonti 2013, Dutertre, Lambert et al. 2014, Naro, Bielli et al. 2015). Two large-scale mass spectrometry (MS) based studies of RBPs in human cancer cell lines together identified more than 1100 RBPs (Baltz, Munschauer et al. 2012, Castello, Fischer et al. 2012) and more recently the “RBPomes” of mouse embryonic stem cells (Kwon, Yi et al. 2013) and yeast (Mitchell, Jain et al. 2013) have been published. However, functional studies describing how these complex protein networks are affected during genotoxic cell stress are still largely missing. One previous study has monitored changes in the RBPome of mouse embryonic fibroblasts subsequent to treatment with the topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide {Boucas, 2015 #112}. To our knowledge, however, no such studies have attempted to monitor altered global protein:RNA binding subsequent to treatment with alkylating agents. This could be particularly interesting since base methylation constitutes an important functional modification of RNA. In the present study we aimed at investigating this in more detail by SILAC-based quantitation of proteins differentially binding to poly(A)-RNA in HeLa cells at different time points after treatment with the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate.