Dataset Information

Identification of Potential BiomarkersRelated to Mesenchymal Stem Cell Response in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

ABSTRACT: Background: Preclinical studies showed thatmesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) ameliorate tau phosphorylation, amyloid-betaaccumulation, and inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) mouse models viasecretion of neurotrophic factors and cytokines. We aimed to identify CSFbiomarkers that can be used to predict or monitor the response to MSCs inpatients with AD. Methods: AD patients were injected withhuman umbilical cord blood-MSCs (n=22) or placebo (n=12). The cerebrospinalfluid (CSF) samples were collected at baseline, one day after the firstinjection, and one day after the third injection. The patients injected withMSCs were classified into good responder (GR) or poor responder (PR) groupsbased on the rate of changes in the ratio of total-tau and phosphorylated-tauin the CSF. We selected three typical participants in each group, and their CSFprotein levels were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem massspectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: In the LC-MS/MS analysis 1,667proteins were identified. 11 proteins showed significant differences betweenthe typical GR and PR at baseline. Based on their significance level and knownfunctions two proteins, reticulocalbin-3 (RCN3) and follistatin-related protein3 (FSTL3), were selected as potential biomarkers to predict MSC response. 173proteins showed significant change one day after the third injection comparedto the baseline in typical GR. We excluded 45 proteins that showed significantchange after the third injection compared to the baseline in the typical PR.Based on their significance level and known function, four proteins,scrapie-responsive protein 1 (SCRG1), neural proliferation and differentiationcontrol protein (NPDC1), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and cystatin C (CysC), wereselected as potential biomarker to monitor MSC response. Additionally,functional analysis revealed that the increased CSF proteins after the thirdinjection compared to the baseline in the typical GR were associated withsynaptogenesis. Conclusions: This study identified twoproteins (RCN3 and FSTL3) that may be potential biomarkers for predicting MSCresponse and four proteins (SCRG1, NPDC1, ApoE, CysC) that may be potentialbiomarkers for monitoring MSC response in patients with AD. Further studies areneeded to validate our results.

INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive HF

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Brain

DISEASE(S): Alzheimer's Disease

SUBMITTER: Sungho Shin

LAB HEAD: Cheolju Lee

PROVIDER: PXD042108 | Pride | 2023-06-29

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 40

Similar Datasets

Project description:We have previously reported that the deficiency of p53 alone or in combination with Rb (Rb-/- p53-/-) in adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) promotes leiomyosarcoma-like tumors in vivo. Here, we hypothesized that the source of MSCs and/or the cell differentiation stage could determine the phenotype of sarcoma development. To investigate whether there is a link between the source of MSCs and sarcoma phenotype, we generated p53-/- and Rb-/-p53-/- MSCs from bone marrow (BM-MSCs). Both genotypes of BM-MSCs initiated leiomyosarcoma formation similar to p53-/- and Rb-/-p53-/- ASCs. In addition, gene expression profiling revealed a link between p53- or Rb-p53-deficient BM-MSCs and ASCs and muscle-associated sarcomagenesis. These data suggest that the tissue source of MSC does not seem a crucial factor in the development of a particular sarcoma phenotype. To analyze whether the differentiation stage defines the sarcoma phenotype, BM-MSCs and ASCs were induced to differentiate towards the osteogenic lineage, and both p53 and Rb were excised using Cre-expressing adenovectors at different stages along osteogenic differentiation. Regardless of the level of osteogenic commitment, the inactivation of Rb and p53 in BM-MSC-derived, but not in ASC-derived, osteogenic progenitors gave rise to osteosarcoma-like tumors which could be serially transplanted. This indicates that the osteogenic differentiation stage of BM-MSCs imposes the phenotype of in vivo sarcoma development, and that BM-MSC-derived osteogenic progenitors rather than undifferentiated BM-MSCs, undifferentiated ASCs or ASC-derived osteogenic progenitors, represent the cell of origin for osteosarcoma development. To analyse whether the BM-MSC and Fat-MSC (ASC) differentiation stage may define the sarcoma phenotype, RbloxP/loxPp53loxP/loxP BM-MSCs and ASCs were induced to differentiate towards the osteogenic lineage and both Rb and p53 were excised with adenoviral vectors expressing the Cre-recombinase gene (Ad-CMV-Cre) at different stages (day 0 and 10) along osteogenic differentiation. NSG mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5M-CM-^W10^6 mutant cells. Animals were killed when tumors reached 1 cm3 or 150 days after infusion. Some of the obtained tumors were mechanically disaggregated to establish ex vivo MSC-transformed cell lines. Gene expression analysis was performed using: WT BM-MSCs and ASCs, Rb-/-p53-/- BM-MSCs and ASCs previously differentiated to the osteogenic lineage for 10 days and a tumor cell line derived from p53-/-Rb-/- BM-MSC differentiated to the osteogenic lineage for 10 days.

Project description:We have previously reported that the deficiency of p53 alone or in combination with Rb (Rb-/- p53-/-) in adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) promotes leiomyosarcoma-like tumors in vivo. Here, we hypothesized that the source of MSCs and/or the cell differentiation stage could determine the phenotype of sarcoma development. To investigate whether there is a link between the source of MSCs and sarcoma phenotype, we generated p53-/- and Rb-/-p53-/- MSCs from bone marrow (BM-MSCs). Both genotypes of BM-MSCs initiated leiomyosarcoma formation similar to p53-/- and Rb-/-p53-/- ASCs. In addition, gene expression profiling revealed a link between p53- or Rb-p53-deficient BM-MSCs and ASCs and muscle-associated sarcomagenesis. These data suggest that the tissue source of MSC does not seem a crucial factor in the development of a particular sarcoma phenotype. To analyze whether the differentiation stage defines the sarcoma phenotype, BM-MSCs and ASCs were induced to differentiate towards the osteogenic lineage, and both p53 and Rb were excised using Cre-expressing adenovectors at different stages along osteogenic differentiation. Regardless of the level of osteogenic commitment, the inactivation of Rb and p53 in BM-MSC-derived, but not in ASC-derived, osteogenic progenitors gave rise to osteosarcoma-like tumors which could be serially transplanted. This indicates that the osteogenic differentiation stage of BM-MSCs imposes the phenotype of in vivo sarcoma development, and that BM-MSC-derived osteogenic progenitors rather than undifferentiated BM-MSCs, undifferentiated ASCs or ASC-derived osteogenic progenitors, represent the cell of origin for osteosarcoma development. BM-MSC and ASC cultures were established from 3 mouse strains: (a) WT, (b) p53loxP/loxP and (c) p53loxP/loxP RbloxP/loxP. The corresponding mutant cells were generated by excision of the LoxP-flanked sequences by infection of all MSC cultures with adenoviral vectors expressing the Cre-recombinase gene (Ad-CMV-Cre). NSG mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 5×10^6 mutant cells. Animals were killed when tumors reached 1 cm3 or 150 days after infusion. Some of the obtained tumors were mechanically disaggregated to establish ex vivo MSC-transformed cell lines. Gene expression analysis was performed using BM-MSCs and ASCs from all genotypes, as well as tumor cell lines derived from p53-/- and p53-/-Rb-/- BM-MSC and ASC cultures.

Project description:Purpose: Most studies conducted towards understanding the differences among the adult sources of MSCs (BM-MSC and AD-MSC) and UC-MSCs have focused on their phenotypic properties which cannot provide an idea of the functional characteristics changing at the molecular level. Even NGS studies done before, each each study focuses on a different profiling methodology, which makes it difficult to establish a molecular equivalency among the various datasets. We undertake an integrative omics comparison between UC-MSC and two other popular sources of adult MSC (BM-MSC and AD-MSC), with the reasoning that a joint modeling of the changes occurring at the various functional levels will provide greater in-depth insight into the molecular heterogeneity related to different sources of MSCs. Methods: human Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) mRNA cultured under basal conditions in Xeno-free media were subjected to deep sequencing. Three different MSC sourcers : adipose (AD-MSC), bone-marrow (BM-MSC) and Wharton-jelly umbilical cord (UC-MSC) were used and three donors from each tissues source along with three biological replicates for each donor were sequenced using the Illumina PE 150 platform. The sequence reads that passed quality filters Q30≥ 80% were analyzed using DESeq2. Results: Using an optimized data analysis workflow, we identified 24,804 transcripts among the three different sources of MSCs. Among these 2127 transcripts (~10%) were found to be differentially expressed among the three sources of MSC, with a\Log2FC| ≥2 and FDR <0.05. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes uncovered significant differences among the neonatal source (UC-MSC) and adult-MSCs (AD-MSC and BM-MSC). Altered gene expression profiles among the sources was also confirmed using a proteomics study of the same three sources of MSC with the same donors. Further, secretory immune-regulatory molecules which were confirmed to be differentially expressed among the MSC sources using the integrated transcriptomics-proteomics approach was validated using a Luminex cytokine profiling study. Conclusions: Our study represents the first detailed integrated analysis of differential gene expression profiling among source-specific human Mesenchymal Stem Cells using a multi-omics approach to validate the observed transcriptomic changes at both the translational as well as secretory levels. Our results offer a comhrehensive evaluation of the differences in immune signaling that exists among the different sourcrs of MSC based on their tissue of origina nd which subsequently plays a decisive role in determining the "regenrative siganture" of these MSCs based on the match between "immune-signature" and "disease type".

			Action	DRS
	200118_CSF.pdStudy	Other
	CSF_Good_response_F1.raw	Raw
	CSF_Good_response_F10.raw	Raw
	CSF_Good_response_F11.raw	Raw
	CSF_Good_response_F12.raw	Raw

Dataset Information

Identification of Potential BiomarkersRelated to Mesenchymal Stem Cell Response in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets