Dataset Information

Effects of temperature and cyanotoxins on the catfish liver proteome

ABSTRACT: Water is one of the resources most affected by the intensification of human activities. As consequences of these activities, we have eutrophication and global warming, which can also favor the blooms of cyanobacteria that produce cyanotoxins. Here we present the hepatic proteome of females and males of catfish Rhamdia quelen exposed to four experimental conditions, for 96 hours: filtered water at 25°C (F2, F3 and F4 as females; F17, F19 and F20 as males), filtered water at 30°C (F5, F6 and F7 as females; F22, F23 and F24 as males), extract equivalent to 100,000 cells/mL of Raphidiopsis raciborskii dissolved in filtered water at 25°C (F9, F10 and F11 as females; F25, F26 and F28 as males); and extract of 100000 cells/mL of Raphidiopsis raciborskii dissolved in filtered water at 30°C (F13, F14 and F15 as females; F29, F30 and F32 as males).

INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD

ORGANISM(S): Rhamdia Quelen

TISSUE(S): Liver

SUBMITTER: Maiara Vicentini

LAB HEAD: Helena Cristina da Silva de Assis

PROVIDER: PXD046475 | Pride | 2024-05-22

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	20191106_41619_Mayara_F2_3.RAW	Raw
	20191106_41619_Mayara_F2_4.RAW	Raw
	20191106_41719_Mayara_F3_1.RAW	Raw
	20191106_41719_Mayara_F3_2.RAW	Raw
	20191106_41819_Mayara_F4_2.RAW	Raw

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 51

Publications

How does temperature rise affect a freshwater catfish Rhamdia quelen? A proteomic approach.

Vicentini Maiara M Simmons Denina D Silva de Assis Helena Cristina HC

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part D, Genomics & proteomics 20240213

Outside of scientific circles, climate change is a hotly debated topic due to all its consequences. Changes in the temperature can affect aquatic organisms and it is important to understand and to detect earlier signals. This study aimed to analyze how a Neotropical fish species responds to temperature increases, using proteomic analysis as a tool. For this, fish of the species Rhamdia quelen, male and female, were exposed to two temperatures: 25 °C and 30 °C. After 96 h, the animals were anesth ...[more]

PMID: 38377663

Similar Datasets

Project description:Drosophila melanogaster adult flies fed on food containing 16 mg/ml of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) in the food show a hyperkinetic behavior within 24 hours. Half of that concentration, i.e., 8 mg/ml, of PTZ, if fed for seven days, though doesn’t cause seizure-like behavior, results in a decreased climbing speed in flies. This change in locomotor behavior is progressive and becomes significant only on seventh day of the treatment. We also examined flies’ locomotor behavior secondary to PTZ withdrawal. Interestingly, an increased climbing speed was found to develop seven days after withdrawal. Importantly, antiepileptic drugs showed effectiveness in the above fly model. Earlier, we submitted in GEO time series of fly head microarray gene expression profiling during chronic PTZ and PTZ withdrawal phase. We also submitted previously expression profiles associated with antiepileptic drug treatment. Here, we have undertaken a different line of work. Having developed a well characterized acquired model of behavioral and gene expression plasticity, we found an opportunity here to investigate if drug exposure to adult males could cause transgenerational effect. To probe this, we carried out a systematic study at both behavioral and microarray gene expression levels. In the latter, we asked the question that do F0 testis, F1 males’ head, F1 females’ head, F1 testis, F2 males’ head and F2 females’ head show gene expression changes if F0 male parents had a history of PTZ exposure? A total of 28 microarray slides were used in this study. Unless mentioned otherwise, standard method of fly handling and manipulation was used. Freshly generated isogenic D. melanogaster Oregon-R wild type flies were grown in standard fly medium consisting of agar-agar, maize powder, brown sugar, dried yeast, and nipagin. The cultures were grown at 24 + 1oC, 60% RH, and 12 hrs light (9 AM to 9 PM) and 12 hours dark cycle. Three to four days old unmated adult males were grown in food containing 8 mg/ml PTZ for seven days. Flies were then shifted to vials containing NF. Seven days after shifting, F0 males were mated to same age group females maintained on NF throughout, without any drug exposure. Males and females were housed in groups in vials containing NF. Eggs collected on NF were used to generate F1 individuals as unmated males and virgin females. F1 males were mated to same age group females which were independently collected and maintained on NF. These females had no history of drug exposure in prior generations. Males and females were housed in groups in vials containing NF. Eggs collected on NF were used to generate F2 individuals as unmated males and virgin females. F0 testis, F1 males’ head, F1 females’ head, F1 testis, F2 males’ head and F2 females’ head were used for RNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated from pools of heads or testis, using TRI REAGENT (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Double stranded cDNA was synthesized from extracted RNA using Microarray cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). The cDNA was purified using Micorarray Target Purification Kit (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each of the four sets of control (no PTZ exposure of F0 males) and treated cDNA samples, belonging to the four biological replicates, was used for labeling with either Cy3 or Cy5 dyes (Amersham Biosciences) using Microarray RNA Target Synthesis Kit T7 (Roche). The labeled products were purified by Microarray Target Purification Kit (Roche). The Cy3 and Cy5 labeled two cRNA samples of each biological replicate were pooled together, precipitated, washed, air-dried, and dissolved in 18MΩ RNAase free water (Sigma). Dye swapping was accomplished by hybridizing two arrays with control as Cy3- and experimental as Cy5- labeled sample, and the rest two as the opposite, control as Cy5- and experimental as Cy3- labeled sample. Two sets of microarrays were generated for F1 males. The labeled product was mixed with hybridization solution containing hybridization buffer (DIG Easy Hyb; Roche), 10 mg/ml salmon testis DNA (0.05 mg/ml final concentration, Sigma) and 10 mg/ml yeast tRNA (0.05 mg/ml final concentration, Sigma). The hybridization mixture was denatured at 65ºC and applied onto cDNA microarray slides (D14Kv1, CDMC, Toronto, Canada). The slides were covered by a coverslip (ESCO, Portsmouth, USA) and hybridization was allowed to take place in hybridization chamber (Corning) at 37ºC for 16 hrs. Following hybridization, the coverslips were removed in a solution containing 1X SSC and 0.1% SDS at 50ºC, and the slides washed in 1X SSC and 0.1% SDS (three times for 15 minutes each) in a coplin jar at 50ºC with occasional swirling and then transferred to 1X SSC and washed with gentle swirling at room temperature (twice for 15 minutes each). Slides were given a final wash in 0.1X SSC for 15 minutes and then liquid was quickly removed from the slide surface by spinning at 600 rpm for 5 minutes. Slides were scanned at 10 µm resolution in GenePix 4000A Microarray Scanner (Molecular Devices). The preprocessing and quantification of the 16 bit TIFF images were carried out using Gene Pix Pro 6.0 software (Molecular Devices). Ratio based normalization was performed using Acuity 4.0 software (Molecular Devices). All Spots with raw intensity less then 100U and less then twice the average background was ignored during normalization. Normalized data was filtered for the selection of features before further analysis. Only those spot were selected which contained only a small percentage (<3) of saturated pixels, were not flagged bad or found absent (flags >= 0), had relatively uniform intensity and uniform background (Rgn R2 (635/532) >= 0.6) and were detectable above background (SNR >= 3). Analyzable spots in at least three of the four biological replicates performed were retrieved for downstream analysis using Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM 3, Excel Add-In, Stanford) under the conditions of one class response, imputation and 100 permutations. Analysis was also carried out using fold-change criterion in Acuity 4.0 itself.

Project description:Background All animals must be able to adapt to changes in nutrient quality and supply. One striking aspect of this adaptive response is the extension of lifespan when caloric intake is reduced. These animals are also more resistant to various stresses, including starvation. We have characterized the response of adult Drosophila males and females to starvation and sugar conditions using high density microarrays. Results We have organized the regulated genes into specific metabolic and physiologic pathways. Most of the highly regulated genes have a strong sex bias. In addition to expected sex specific changes, such as egg production in females, we found unexpected biases in sensory systems, amino acid and purine metabolism, and signaling pathways. Comparison of starvation to caloric restriction revealed numerous overlaps. Conclusions Our results support the notion that starvation response shares similarities to caloric restriction. They have relevance for sex specific differences in longevity and in response to nutrient conditions which alter lifespan. Nutrient Conditions and Fly handling Larvae were kept on apple juice agar plates with yeast, and the larvae were raised at 25°C. For the developmental control larvae were collected 39-41 h AEL, for the developmental time-points at 51-53 hours and every 12 hours until 99-101 hours. Adult flies were kept at 25°C in 50 ml PS-tubes flat bottom (Greiner bio-one, Frickenhausen, Germany) on standard fly food (16.5 g yeast, 81,5 g cornmeal, 8 g agar, 100 ml sugar beet sirup and 200 ml 10% Nipagin in EtOH). Flies were collected that had hatched in 24 hours and kept in groups of ~200 flies/tube. After 5 days we separated males and females and put them in groups of 80/28 ml PS-tube. We allowed for one day CO2 recovery on standard fly food before flies were moved to 1) tubes with yeast paste on PBS soaked filter paper (control) 2) tubes with only PBS soaked filter paper (starvation) or 3) tubes with filter paper soaked in PBS with 20% Sucrose (sugar). After 24 or 48 hours flies were shock frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at - 80°C for further handling. Males and females were assayed separately. For females, we performed 24 and 48 starvation, and 24 and 48 hours sugar. For the males only 24 hour starvation was done, since most died upon 48 hour starvation; and 24 and 48 hour sugar. Briefly, flies were collected within a 24 hour period, allowed to stay together for 4 days, separated into males and females, and allowed one day recovery in normal fly food. Afterwards, the flies were placed into three conditions: fresh yeast plus PBS, PBS or PBS plus 20 % sucrose. These experiments essentially parallel the experimental set up of previous larval experiments (7). The starvation and PBS were then compared with yeast (control). Keywords: ordered

Project description:In this study we aimed to obtain gene expression data during development of Drosophila melanogaster. Therefore 10 critical stages from egg to adult fly were chosen. Specifically the purpose of the project was to study gene expression in the under-replicated regions of polytene chromosomes that were discovered earlier (see GSE2551). Biological samples from ten developmental stages were collected: 0-1 hour embryos, 5-6 hours embryos, 11-12 hours embryos, 1st instar larvae 0-1 hour after hatching, 2nd instar larvae after molt, 3rd instar larvae after molt, 0-1 hour prepupae, 13-14 hours pupae, adult males and adult females. 0-1h embryos demonstrate maternally expressed genes. 5-6h embryos represent early zygotic expression. 11-12h embryos represent organogenesis of larva. 1st instar larvae are freshly hatched completely formed larvae. 2nd instar larvae were collected after first molt. 3rd instar larvae were collected after second molt. 0-1h prepupae represent early metamorphosis. 13-14h pupae represent organogenesis of adult fly. Adult males and females collected separately represent differences between sexes. Embryos were collected as follows: flies were allowed to lay eggs for 45 min on the agar/apple juice medium with some yeast. Embryos were either collected immediately and frozen at -80°C or allowed to develop at 25°C to the stage of interest and then collected and frozen. 1st instar larvae were collected right after hatching. 2nd and 3rd larvae were collected after corresponding molts, 24 hours and 48 hours after hatching. 0-1 hour prepupae were picked each hour from the tube walls and either frozen at -80°C immediately or allowed to develop at 25°C to for 13 hours to obtain 13-14 hours pupae. Adult males and females were collected twice a day, kept for 3 days at 25°C and then separated and frozen at -80°C. The females collected in this way were mated. Total RNA isolation from the frozen samples was performed with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, #155-96-011). RNAs from ten stages were isolated in parallel and diluted to the same concentration (4ug/ul). The reference sample was prepared by mixing of the same amount of total RNA from each stage. 25ug of sample and reference RNAs were labeled with either Cy-3 or Cy-5 dUTPs (Amersham, #PA53022 and #PA55022) using SuperScript Direct cDNA Labeling System (Invitrogen, # L1015-02) according to provided protocol. Labeled cDNAs were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, #28104) and combined in one tube. 20ug of sonicated salmon sperm DNA were added. DNA mixture was dried in the stream of nitrogen and dissolved in 60ul of hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 6xSSC, 0.5% SDS and 5xDenhardt’s). Microarray slides were prehybridized in 6xSSC, 0.5% SDS and 1% BSA at 42°C water bath for 1 hour, rinsed with deionized water and dried in bucket rotor centrifuge in 50ml Falcon tubes (5 min, 1000xg). Labeled cDNAs were denatured at 100°C heat block for 2 min, cooled at room temperature, pipetted on the surface of microarray and covered with 25x60 mm LifterSlip (Erie Scientific Company). Assembled microarray was hybridized for 12-14 hours in the VersArray hybridization chamber (Bio-Rad) at 42°C water bath. After hybridization arrays were placed to the beaker with 1xSSC and 0.1% SDS to remove the LifterSlips. Then three washes were performed in the same solution (10 min, 5 min and 5 min) After that microarrays were rinsed with 1xSSC (30 sec), 0.1xSSC (30 sec) and dried in centrifuge as described above. Dry microarrays were scanned at 10 um resolution on ScanArray Lite instrument (Perkin Elmer). The scans were analyzed using TIGR Spotfinder program (www.tm4.org). Data were lowess normalized and filtered using MIDAS software (www.tm4.org). The final datasets were compiled in Microsoft Excel.