Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

ABSTRACT: Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJEB10820 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR1014120_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1014120_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1014130_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1014130_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1014121_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 36

Similar Datasets

DNA Extraction

Project description:DNA extraction method targeted loci environmental

| PRJNA315949 | ENA

DNA extraction methods comparison

Project description:The impact of the DNA extraction methods on the gut bacterial and fungal microbiota community recovery

| PRJEB29363 | ENA

Performance comparison of three DNA extraction kits on human whole-exome data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded normal and tumor samples

Project description:We generated 42 human whole-exome sequencing data sets from fresh-frozen (FF) and FFPE samples. These samples include normal and tumor tissues from two different organs (liver and colon), that we extracted with three different FFPE extraction kits (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit and GeneRead DNA FFPE kit from Qiagen, Maxwell\textsuperscript{TM} RSC DNA FFPE Kit from Promega). Variant calling analysis shows a very high rate of concordance between matched FF / FFPE pairs and equivalent performance for the three kits we analyzed. We find a significant variation in the difference of total number of variants called between FF and FFPE samples for the three different FFPE DNA extraction kits. Coverage analysis shows that FFPE samples have less good indicators than FF samples, yet the coverage quality remains above accepted thresholds. We detect limited but significant variations in coverage indicator values between the three FFPE extraction kits. Globally, the GeneRead and QIAamp kits have better variant calling and coverage indicators than the Maxwell kit on the samples used in this study, although this kit performs better on some indicators and has advantages in terms of practical usage. Taken together, our results confirm the potential of FFPE samples analysis for clinical genomic studies, but also indicate that the choice of a FFPE DNA extraction kit should be done with careful testing and analysis beforehand in order to maximize the accuracy of the results.

| EGAS00001002631 | EGA

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.

2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

Comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits using NA12878 trio DNA

Project description:A technical comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits, by triplicate sequencing of the cell line DNA of NA12878, NA12891, NA12892 and NIST RM8395

2019-09-20 | E-MTAB-8349 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Homo sapiens isolate:Puregene DNA Isolation Kits

Project description:Homo sapiens isolate:Puregene DNA Isolation Kits Genome sequencing

| PRJNA591378 | ENA

DNA extraction method from alfalfa

Project description:DNA extraction method from alfalfa Metagenome

| PRJNA901244 | ENA

Comparison of six commercial kits to extract bacterial chromosome and plasmid DNA for MiSeq sequencing.

Project description:We compared commercial kits for extraction of genomic DNA from the Gram-negative bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae for subsequent Miseq sequencing. Purification of DNA was based on matrix binding (silica or anion exchange resin) or differential precipitation (salting out), respectively. The choice of extraction kit had little effect on sequencing quality and coverage across drastically different replicons, except for an apparent depletion of small plasmids (<5?kb) during precipitation-based extractions. Sequencing coverage provided copy-number estimates for small plasmids that were consistently higher than those from quantitative real-time PCR.

| S-EPMC4911584 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits using NA12878 trio DNA

Project description:Comparison of Agilent SureSelect Focussed Exome and TruSight One Mendeliome sequencing kits using NA12878 trio DNA

| PRJEB34483 | ENA