Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

FloChIP TF benchmarking data

ABSTRACT: FloChIP TF benchmarking data

PROVIDER: PRJEB35684 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR3712350_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3712350_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3712351_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3712351_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3712346_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 12

Similar Datasets

FloChIP TF benchmarking data

Project description:Performed FloChIP for PU.1, RUNX3 and CEBPB to demonstrate feasibility of TF ChIP-seq on multiple factors.

2019-12-08 | E-MTAB-8553 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Methylation microarray data related to TIME-Seq benchmarking

Project description:Methylation microarray data related to TIME-Seq benchmarking

| PRJNA1029186 | ENA

iiCLIP protocol benchmarking with PTBP1

Project description:We describe an improved individual nucleotide resolution CLIP protocol (iiCLIP), which can be completed within 4 days from UV crosslinking to libraries for sequencing. For benchmarking, we directly compared PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries with the iCLIP2 protocol produced under standardised conditions with 1 million HEK293 cells, and with public eCLIP and iCLIP PTBP1 data. There are 3 PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries, 1 input iiCLIP library and 1 PTBP1 iCLIP2 library produced in this study.

2022-08-01 | E-MTAB-10881 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Benchmarking of 4C-seq pipelines based on real and simulated data

Project description:With its capacity for high-resolution data output in one region of interest, chromosome conformation capture combined with high-throughput sequencing (4C-seq) is a state-of-the-art next-generation sequencing technique that provides epigenetic insights, and regularly advances current medical research. However, 4C-seq data is complex and prone to biases, and while specialized programs exist, an unbiased, extensive benchmarking is still lacking. Furthermore, neither substantial datasets with fully characterized ground truth, nor simulation programs for realistic 4C-seq data have been published. We conducted a benchmarking study on 54 4C-seq samples from 12 datasets, including original murine BMM, T-cell, and 416B data, and developed a novel 4C-seq simulation software to allow for more detailed comparisons of 4C-seq algorithms on 50 simulated datasets with 10 to 120 samples each.

2019-05-29 | GSE123131 | GEO

Mouse methylation microarray data related to TIME-Seq benchmarking

Project description:Mouse methylation microarray data related to TIME-Seq benchmarking

| PRJNA1029183 | ENA

Desulfuromonas sp. TF strain:TF

Project description:Desulfuromonas sp. TF strain:TF Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA175252 | ENA

Benchmarking of viruses detection from single-cell RNA sequencing data

Project description:Benchmarking of viruses detection from single-cell RNA sequencing data

| PRJNA628697 | ENA

MicrobIEM decontamination benchmarking

Project description:Benchmarking MicrobIEM - a user-friendly tool for decontamination of microbiome sequencing data

| PRJEB67797 | ENA

Benchmarking of RNA-sequencing analysis workflows using whole-transcriptome RT-qPCR expression data

Project description:RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard for whole-transcriptome gene expression quantification. Multiple algorithms have been developed to derive gene counts from sequencing reads. While a number of benchmarking studies have been conducted, the question remains how individual methods perform at accurately quantifying gene expression levels from RNA-sequencing reads. We performed an independent benchmarking study using RNA-sequencing data from the well established MAQCA and MAQCB reference samples. RNA-sequencing reads were processed using five popular workflows (Tophat-HTSeq, Tophat-Cufflinks, STAR-HTSeq, Kallisto and Salmon) and resulting gene expression measurements were compared to expression data generated by wet-lab validated qPCR assays for all protein coding genes. All methods showed high gene expression rank correlations with qPCR data. When comparing gene expression fold changes between MAQCA and MAQCB samples, about 85% of the genes showed consistent results between RNA-sequencing and qPCR data. Of note, each method revealed a small but specific set of genes with inconsistent expression measurements. A significant proportion of these method-specific inconsistent genes were reproducibly identified in independent datasets. These genes were typically smaller, had fewer exons and were lower expressed compared to genes with consistent expression measurements. We propose that careful validation is warranted when evaluating RNA-seq based expression profiles for this specific set of genes.

2017-01-31 | GSE83402 | GEO

Benchmarking DIA data analysis workflows

Project description:Data independent acquisition (DIA) has become a well-established method in LC-MS driven proteomics. Nonetheless, there are still a lot of possibilities at the data analysis level. By benchmarking different DIA analysis workflows through a ground truth sample mimicking real differential abundance samples, consisting of a differential spike-in of UPS2 in a constant yeast background, we provide a roadmap for DIA data analysis of shotgun samples based on whether sensitivity, precision or accuracy is of the essence. Three different commonly used DIA software tools (DIA-NN, EncyclopeDIA and SpectronautTM) were tested in both spectral library mode and spectral library free mode. In spectral library mode we used the independent spectral library prediction tools Prosit and MS2PIP together with DeepLC, next to the classical DDA-based spectral libraries. In total we benchmarked 12 DIA workflows. DIA-NN in library free mode or using in silico predicted libraries shows the highest sensitivity maintaining a high reproducibility and accuracy.

2024-05-06 | PXD044981 | Pride

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data