CellMixS: quantifying and visualizing batch effects in single cell RNA-seq data
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJEB42051 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERR5000350_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR5000350_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR5000360_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR5000360_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR5000351_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 26 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:A key challenge in single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis are dataset- and batch-specific differences that can obscure the biological signal of interest. While there are various tools and methods to perform data integration and correct for batch effects, their performance can vary between datasets and according to the nature of the bias. Therefore, it is important to understand how batch effects manifest in order to adjust for them in a reliable way. Here, we systematically explore batch effects in scRNA-seq data from a variety of datasets according to magnitude, cell type specificity and complexity. We developed a cell-specific mixing score (\texttt{cms}) that quantifies how well cells from multiple batches are mixed. By considering distance distributions (in a lower dimensional space), the score is able to detect local batch bias and differentiate between unbalanced batches (i.e., when one cell type is more abundant in a batch) and systematic differences between cells of the same cell type. We implemented the \texttt{cms}, as well as related metrics to detect batch effects or measure structure preservation, in the CellMixS R/Bioconductor package. We systematically compare different metrics that have been proposed to quantify batch effects or bias in scRNA-seq data using real datasets with known batch effects and synthetic data that mimic various real data scenarios. While these metrics target the same question and are used interchangeably, we find differences in inter- and intra-dataset scalability, sensitivity and in a metric's ability to handle batch effects with differentially abundant cell types. We find that cell-specific metrics outperform cell type-specific and global metrics and recommend them for both method benchmarks and batch exploration.
2021-01-31 | E-MTAB-9916 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A key challenge in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis is batch effects that can obscure the biological signal of interest. Although there are various tools and methods to correct for batch effects, their performance can vary. Therefore, it is important to understand how batch effects manifest to adjust for them. Here, we systematically explore batch effects across various scRNA-seq datasets according to magnitude, cell type specificity, and complexity. We developed a cell-specific mixing score (cms) that quantifies mixing of cells from multiple batches. By considering distance distributions, the score is able to detect local batch bias as well as differentiate between unbalanced batches and systematic differences between cells of the same cell type. We compare metrics in scRNA-seq data using real and synthetic datasets and whereas these metrics target the same question and are used interchangeably, we find differences in scalability, sensitivity, and ability to handle differentially abundant cell types. We find that cell-specific metrics outperform cell type-specific and global metrics and recommend them for both method benchmarks and batch exploration.
| S-EPMC7994321 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It is well known, but frequently overlooked, that low- and high-throughput molecular data may contain batch effects, i.e., systematic technical variation. Confounding of experimental batches with the variable(s) of interest is especially concerning, as a batch effect may then be interpreted as a biologically significant finding. An integral step towards reducing false discovery in molecular data analysis includes inspection for batch effects and application of computational tools to reduce this signal if present. In a 30-sample pilot Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 (450k array) experiment, we identified two sources of batch effects: array row and chip. Here, we demonstrate two approaches taken to process the 450k data in which an R function, ComBat, was applied to adjust for this non-biological signal. In the “initial analysis”, the application of ComBat to an unbalanced study design resulted in 9,683 and 19,192 significant (FDR<0.05) DNA methylation differences, despite none present prior to correction. Suspicious of this dramatic change, a “revised processing” included changes to our analysis as well as a greater number of samples, and successfully reduced batch effects without introducing false signal. Our work supports conclusions made by an article previously published in this journal: though the ultimate antidote to batch effects is thoughtful study design, every DNA methylation microarray analysis should inspect, assess and, if necessary, adjust for batch effects. The analysis experience presented here can serve as a reminder to the broader community to establish research questions a priori, ensure that they match with study design and encourage communication between technicians and analysts.
2018-07-01 | GSE108567 | GEO
Project description:We generated two comprehensive large-scale proteomics datasets with deliberate batch effects using the latest parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation in both Data-Dependent and Data-Indepentdent Acquisition modes. This dataset contain a balanced two-class design (cell lines: A549 vs K562), allowing for investigating mixed effects from class, batch and acquisition method. Investigators can also compare and integrate DDA and DIA platforms, delve into the various patterns and mechanisms of missing values, benchmark batch effects correction algorithms and assess confounding between different technical issues.
2023-11-21 | PXD041421 | Pride
Project description:We generated two comprehensive large-scale proteomics datasets with deliberate batch effects using the latest parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation in both Data-Dependent and Data-Indepentdent Acquisition modes. This dataset contain a balanced two-class design (cell lines: HCC1806 vs HS578T), allowing for investigating mixed effects from class, batch and acquisition method. Investigators can also compare and integrate DDA and DIA platforms, delve into the various patterns and mechanisms of missing values, benchmark batch effects correction algorithms and assess confounding between different technical issues.
2023-11-21 | PXD041391 | Pride
Project description:The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Isoform Expression Quantification Data is the largest ressource of isomiR level sequenced cancer data publicly available. Since the datasets were built up over years and through different contributing institutions, it is not free of batch effects. We evaluated different batch correction approaches to remove batch effects in the data, details of the best performing algorithm and batch variables are included in the supplementary file. Additionally, annotation of the chromosomal end position of each isomiR feature was corrected by the offset of 1 to account for exclusive annotation.
2021-02-17 | GSE164767 | GEO
Project description:Clinker: visualizing fusion genes detected in RNA-seq data
| PRJNA451407 | ENA
Project description:Adjusting for batch effects in DNA methylation microarray data, a lesson learned
| PRJNA427719 | ENA
Project description:Visualizing programmed lineage trajectories at cancer initiation
| PRJNA639282 | ENA
Project description:The cell cycle is known to regulate cell proliferation and cell fate decisions, the underlying mechanism of which is well-studied and conserved across species and cell types. To date, the cell cycle is receiving a renewed importance due to the rapid advancement of single-cell genomics technology. Especially in the analysis of single-cell gene expression, the cell cycle plays a key role in understanding the expression variation across cell states and cell types. The current study was designed to develop effective tools for assessing and predicting the cell cycle in single-cell gene expression data analysis. We collected both Fluorescent Ubiquitination-based Cell Cycle Indicator (FUCCI) – for determining the cell cycle – and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data from each individual using STRT-seq on the Fluidigm C1 platform. The cells were collected from iPSCs derived from 6 genotyped Yoruba cell lines. The experimental design controlled for C1 processing batch effects, as well as individual and gender effects. Using these data, we developed a supervised approach for predicting the cyclical ordering of single cells in the cell cycle using single-cell gene expression data. We used the FUCCI fluorescent intensities to determine a cyclical ordering of the individual cells, and to assign cell time labels for individual cells representing each cell's position in one complete cell cycle. We estimated the cyclical trend of expression levels for each gene based on the FUCCI-derived cell times, and identified candidate sets of cyclical genes for model training. We trained our model in in 5-fold cross-validation and evaluate the trained model in held-out validation samples and external datasets. We compared the prediction results with existing approaches for estimating the cell cycle using single-cell gene expression data: including unsupervised approaches to construct the cyclical ordering of single cells and approaches to categorically assign the cell cycle to individual cells. These results provide a benchmark for assessing the cell cycle in scRNA-seq data analysis and insights into the effects of the cell cycle on gene expression variation in stem cells.
2019-02-12 | GSE121265 | GEO