Evaluation of CRISPR efficienty on maize protoplasts
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJEB56234 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERR10232200_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR10232200_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR10232201_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR10232201_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR10232202_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 48 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Plant biotechnology needs new methods that accelerate design-build-test-learn cycles to develop new gene editing reagents. We have established ITER (Iterative Testing of Editing Reagents) based on arrayed protoplast transfections and high-content imaging, allowing one optimization cycle –from design to results– within three weeks. We validated ITER in wheat and maize protoplasts using Cas9 cytosine and adenine base editors and used it to develop an optimized LbCas12a-ABE system. Sequential improvement of five components –NLS, crRNA, LbCas12a nuclease, adenine deaminase and linker– led to a systematic, stepwise increase in ABE activity at extrachromosomal GFP reporter (from 0.5% to 40%) and endogenous target sites. We confirmed the activity of LbCas12a-ABE in stable wheat transformants and leveraged these improvements to develop a highly mutagenic LbCas12a nuclease and a LbCas12a-CBE. Our data show that ITER is a sensitive, versatile, and high-throughput platform that can be harnessed to accelerate the development of genome editing technologies in plants.
2022-11-21 | GSE200450 | GEO
Project description:CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing has revolutionized experimental molecular biology and entered the clinical world for targeted gene therapy. Identifying DNA modifications occurring at CRISPR/Cas9 target sites is critical to determine efficiency and safety of editing tools. Here we show that insertions of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons can occur frequently at CRISPR/Cas9 editing sites. Together with PolyA-seq and an improved amplicon sequencing, we characterize more than 2,500 de novo L1 insertions at multiple CRISPR/Cas9 editing sites in HEK293T, HeLa and U2OS cells. These L1 retrotransposition events exploit CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSB formation and require L1 RT activity. Importantly, de novo L1 insertions are rare during genome editing by prime editors (PE), cytidine or adenine base editors (CBE or ABE), consistent with their reduced DSB formation. These data demonstrate that insertions of retrotransposons might be a potential outcome of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and provide further evidence on the safety of different CRISPR-based editing tools.
2022-06-07 | GSE178440 | GEO
Project description:Genome-wide knockout or knockdown screens have become powerful tools for the investigation of genotype-to-phenotype relationships. In bacteria, these screens commonly rely on transcriptional repression by dCas9, gene knockouts through Cas9 editing or random transposon mutagenesis, but depending on the technique, suffer from incomplete gene silencing, low editing efficiencies or they require massive library sizes. Here, we take a distinct approach with base editing to introduce premature stop codons or mutate start codons in Escherichia coli using a ScCas9 nickase derived base editor (ScBE3) that exhibits flexible PAM recognition. We then derive guide design rules by applying machine learning to a gene essentiality screen conducted in E. coli. For further improvement, we combined base-editing with Cas9-induced cleavage of the unedited cell fraction. The efficiency of this dual system was validated through a screen of conditionally essential E. coli genes. This improved setup that decouples the gene editing from the screening leads to more efficient guide depletion and confirmed previously published conditionally essential genes. Overall, base editing represents a useful tool for genome-wide knockout screens in bacteria and will eventually enable genome-wide knockout screens in a broader range of bacterial species to study their diverse genetics.
2024-02-05 | GSE225335 | GEO
Project description:We have generated over 80 million 32 nt reads generated from RNA samples isolated from the tip and base of a developing Mo17 leaf. A comparision of these data with the maize AGP resulted in the confirmation of approximately 88% of the maize filtered gene set Keywords: Transcriptome analysis
2009-08-15 | GSE16916 | GEO
Project description:Adenine and cytosine base editors (ABEs and CBEs) represent a new genome editing technology that allows the programmable installation of A-to-G or C-to-T alterations on DNA. We engineered Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9-based adenine and cytosine base editor (SpACE) that enables efficient simultaneous introduction of A-to-G and C-to-T substitutions in the same base editing window on DNA.
2020-07-02 | GSE137411 | GEO
Project description:Band20 Maize WT-T43 BS strands soluble BGS (base green soluble) 1repl Marc07 trypsin in gel digest Orbitrap
2011-04-15 | PRD000157 | Pride
Project description:CRISPR-Cas base editors are preferred tool for genome editing as they generate desired editing without any double strand break in the genome, as double stand break is detrimental to the cells. In our study we have demonstrated the significance of base editors in editing the highly homologous HBG promoter (HBG1 and HBG2) region to introduce novel HPFH-like mutation to elevate HbF for therapeutical applications. Previous studies revealed that the base editors can cause unintended Cas-independent edits at transcriptome level. To validate off-target at RNA level, we performed a transcriptome wide analysis. The frequency of unintended edits in the HUDEP-2 stable cell lines expressing the base editors with the gRNA were not significant compared to the control. We determined the ABE mediated A to I conversion and CBE mediated C to U conversion across the base edited samples. The RNA off-target analysis was carried out with the help of REDItools v 2 tool. This data suggests that despite high on-target editing in DNA, the Cas-independent RNA off-target were not at detectable range compared to control. The differential expression of 34 selected genes which necessitate globin regulation were compared between the unedited HUDEP WT, CBE control, ABE control, and edited ABE (with gRNA 2/11) and edited CBE (with gRNA 2/11). We observed that there is no significant differential gene expression between the edited and control cells except the gamma and delta globin genes. These results suggest that base editors are preferred tools to edit highly homologous HBG promoter region to created HPFH-like mutations inducing HbF levels without causing double strand breaks, larger deletions and no significant RNA off-targets which are detrimental to the gene edited cells.
2022-01-02 | GSE192801 | GEO
Project description:The continued development of novel genome editors calls for a universal method to analyze their off-target effects. Here we describe a versatile method, called Tracking-seq, for in situ identification of off-target effects that is broadly applicable to common genome-editing tools, including Cas9, base editors and prime editors. Through tracking replication protein A (RPA)-bound single-stranded DNA followed by strand-specific library construction, Tracking-seq requires a low cell input and is suitable for in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo genome editing, providing a sensitive and practical genome-wide approach for off-target detection in various scenarios. We show, using the same guide RNA, that Tracking-seq detects heterogeneity in off-target effects between different editor modalities and between different cell types, underscoring the necessity of direct measurement in the original system.
2024-05-31 | GSE236360 | GEO
Project description:We examined the off-targets of new base editing tools at RNA level
2020-10-14 | GSE142840 | GEO