Project description:We also used microarray analysis to examine transcriptomic changes under moderate drought, identifying thousends of genes that potentially mediate moderate drought responses in the flower, including genes encoding transcription factors that likely play crucial regulatory roles. Arabidopsis were well-watered until after just bolting (after 24 days growth with the main stem about 1 cm high) when moderate drought treatment was started by withholding water (defined as day 0 for moderate drought treatment). The relative soil moisture content decreased rapidly and, after about 48 hours the relative soil moisture content was near 50% of the soil water-holding capacity (first moderate drough treated sample M3 were collected at day 3 (72 h after withholding water)). The soil water condition was maintained by daily watering until almost all the fruits were mature and ready to harvest (about 50 days). For well-watered (control) plants, 90% of the soil water-holding capacity was maintained until tissue harvest or after seed maturation (pots were weighed and watered twice per day). Unopened floral bud samples were collected at day 0, 3, 4, 5, 10.
Project description:We also used microarray analysis to examine transcriptomic changes under drought, identifying thousands of genes that potentially mediate drought responses in the flower, including genes encoding transcription factors that likely play crucial regulatory roles. Arabidopsis were well-watered until after just bolting (after 24 days growth with the main stem about 1 cm high) when drought treatment was started by withholding water (defined as day 0 for drought treatment). The relative soil moisture content decreased sharply and, after about 80 hours (defined as day 3 for drought treatment), the relative soil moisture content was near 35% of the soil water-holding capacity. The soil water condition was maintained by daily watering until almost all the fruits were mature and ready to harvest (about 50 days). For well-watered (control) plants, 90% of the soil water-holding capacity was maintained until tissue harvest or after seed maturation (pots were weighed and watered twice per day). Unopened flower samples were collected, from both treated and control plants, at day 0, 3, 4, 5, 10.
Project description:Kertinocyte cultures grown in 60 mm petri dishes were placed 186 mm from the solar simulator source (Solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation 1600W Xenon short arc lamp with an Oriel Air Mass 1 Direct Filter, (AM1:D:B; model 81074) and KG2 Short Pass Filter. irradiance 9.84 mW/cm² for UVA (98.3%), 0.174 mW/cm² for UVB (1.7%) and 10 mW/cm² (0.017 mW/cm² erythemally-weighted) for the total UVR irradiance) and received a dose of either 0, 10, 20 and 150 kJ/m2 of unweighted ultraviolet radiation and 0, 10 and 150 kJ/m2 of unweighted ultraviolet radiation with SPF 15 sunscreen filtration (Homosalate 3%, Octisalate 4%, Avobenzone 2%, Titanium dioxide 0.66%) (2 mg/cm2 sandwiched between two 5x5 inch quartz plates) and were temperature controlled at 37oC using a customized water-bath. Six and Twenty-four hours post-exposure cells were harvested and RNA was extracted and subjected to microarray analysis.
Project description:We used microarray analysis to examine transcriptomic changes upon dreb1a under drought, identifying hundreds of genes that potentially function downstream of DREB1A and mediate drought responses in the flower, including genes encoding transcription factors that likely play crucial regulatory roles. DREB1a mutant (CS872453) were well-watered until after just bolting (after 24 days growth with the main stem about 1 cm high) when drought treatment was started by withholding water (defined as day 0 for drought treatment). The relative soil moisture content decreased sharply and, after about 80 hours (defined as day 3 for drought treatment), the relative soil moisture content was near 35% of the soil water-holding capacity. The soil water condition was maintained by daily watering until almost all the fruits were mature and ready to harvest. Unopened flower samples were collected from drought treated plants, at day 3, 4, 5.
Project description:Mice were exposed to 2.5% DSS (MW 36,000–50,000, MP Biomedicals) prepared in autoclaved drinking water for five days, after which they were provided DSS-free drinking water for 13 days. On day 12, 16.7% of mice (20 of 120) whose body weight returned to the same level as on day 1 (the change of body weight was less than 0.5 g) and exhibited an DAI of 0 or 1.00, were used as “well-recovered” mice. To identify which fecal miRNAs were affected during DSS-induced colitis and the recovery phase, we performed small RNA sequencing in feces obtained from well-recovered mice on days 0, 5, and 12 of the treatment regimen.
Project description:Wheat cultivars ‘TAM 111’ and ‘TAM 112’ have been dominantly grown in the Southern U.S. Great Plains for many years due to their excellent, yet variable, drought tolerance. To identify the molecular basis and genetic control of drought tolerance in these two landmark cultivars, RNA-seq analysis was conducted to compare gene expression difference in flag leaves under fully irrigated (wet) and water deficient (dry) conditions. Of the 122,017 gene sequences assembled, 2,254 genes showed significantly altered expression patterns under dry and wet conditions in the two cultivars. TAM 111 had 593 and 1,532 dry-wet differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and TAM 112 had 777 and 1,670 at heading and grain-filling stages, respectively. The two cultivars have 1,214 (53.9%) dry-wet DEGs in common, which agreed with their excellent adaption to drought, but 438 and 602 dry-wet DEGs were respectively shown only in TAM 111 and TAM 112 suggested that each may have a specific mechanism to cope with drought. Annotation of all 2,254 genes with dry-wet expression difference found 1,855 have functions related to biosynthesis, stress responses, defense responses, transcription factors and cellular components related to ion or protein transportation and signal transduction. Comparing hierarchical structure of biological processes, molecule functions and cellular components revealed the significant regulation differences between TAM 111 and TAM 112, particularly for genes of phosphorylation and adenyl ribonucleotide binding, and proteins located in nucleus and plasma membrane. Comparing gene expressions involved in responses to stresses of water deprivation, heat and oxidative, ABA-induced signal pathway and transcription regulation found TAM 112 have more specific dry-wet DEGs than TAM 111 with most of them up-regulated, indicating that TAM 112 is more active than TAM 111 in response to drought. In addition, 399 dry-wet DEGs with unknown functions included 258 genes encoding predicted uncharacterized proteins and 141 unannotated genes with no similar sequences identified in the databases. These may represent novel genes related to drought response in TAM 111 or TAM 112. This research thus revealed different drought-tolerance mechanisms in TAM 111 and TAM 112 and identified useful drought tolerance genes for wheat adaption.