RNAseq of VP882 phage activation in V. cholerae
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1040288 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR26830520.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26830521.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26830522.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26830523.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR26830524.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 18 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Many, if not all, bacteria use quorum sensing (QS) to control gene expression and collective behaviours, and more recently QS has also been discovered in bacteriophages (phages). Phages can produce communication molecules of their own, or “listen in” on the host’s communication processes, in order to switch between lytic and lysogenic modes of infection. In this project, we studied the interaction of Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera disease, with the lysogenic vibriophage VP882. The lytic cycle of VP882 is induced by the QS molecule DPO (3,5-dimethylpyrazin-2-ol), however, the global regulatory consequences of DPO-mediated VP882 activation have remained unclear. Using a combination of transcriptomic, genetic, and biochemical approaches, we discovered that induction of VP882 results in binding of phage transcripts to the major RNA chaperone Hfq, which in turn outcompete and down-regulate host-derived Hfq-dependent small RNAs (sRNAs). VP882 itself also encodes Hfq-binding sRNAs and we demonstrate that one of these sRNAs, named VpdS, modulates the expression of multiple host and phage mRNAs through a base-pairing mechanism and thereby promotes phage replication. We further show that host-derived sRNAs can affect phage replication by interfering with the translation of phage mRNAs and thus might be part of the phage defence arsenal of the host. Taken together, our data draw a complex picture of post-transcriptional interactions occurring between host- and phage-derived transcripts that together determine the phage-mediated lysis program.
2023-11-23 | GSE247769 | GEO
Project description:Many, if not all, bacteria use quorum sensing (QS) to control gene expression and collective behaviours, and more recently QS has also been discovered in bacteriophages (phages). Phages can produce communication molecules of their own, or “listen in” on the host’s communication processes, in order to switch between lytic and lysogenic modes of infection. In this project, we studied the interaction of Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera disease, with the lysogenic vibriophage VP882. The lytic cycle of VP882 is induced by the QS molecule DPO (3,5-dimethylpyrazin-2-ol), however, the global regulatory consequences of DPO-mediated VP882 activation have remained unclear. Using a combination of transcriptomic, genetic, and biochemical approaches, we discovered that induction of VP882 results in binding of phage transcripts to the major RNA chaperone Hfq, which in turn outcompete and down-regulate host-derived Hfq-dependent small RNAs (sRNAs). VP882 itself also encodes Hfq-binding sRNAs and we demonstrate that one of these sRNAs, named VpdS, modulates the expression of multiple host and phage mRNAs through a base-pairing mechanism and thereby promotes phage replication. We further show that host-derived sRNAs can affect phage replication by interfering with the translation of phage mRNAs and thus might be part of the phage defence arsenal of the host. Taken together, our data draw a complex picture of post-transcriptional interactions occurring between host- and phage-derived transcripts that together determine the phage-mediated lysis program.
2023-11-23 | GSE247768 | GEO
Project description:Many, if not all, bacteria use quorum sensing (QS) to control gene expression and collective behaviours, and more recently QS has also been discovered in bacteriophages (phages). Phages can produce communication molecules of their own, or “listen in” on the host’s communication processes, in order to switch between lytic and lysogenic modes of infection. In this project, we studied the interaction of Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera disease, with the lysogenic vibriophage VP882. The lytic cycle of VP882 is induced by the QS molecule DPO (3,5-dimethylpyrazin-2-ol), however, the global regulatory consequences of DPO-mediated VP882 activation have remained unclear. Using a combination of transcriptomic, genetic, and biochemical approaches, we discovered that induction of VP882 results in binding of phage transcripts to the major RNA chaperone Hfq, which in turn outcompete and down-regulate host-derived Hfq-dependent small RNAs (sRNAs). VP882 itself also encodes Hfq-binding sRNAs and we demonstrate that one of these sRNAs, named VpdS, modulates the expression of multiple host and phage mRNAs through a base-pairing mechanism and thereby promotes phage replication. We further show that host-derived sRNAs can affect phage replication by interfering with the translation of phage mRNAs and thus might be part of the phage defence arsenal of the host. Taken together, our data draw a complex picture of post-transcriptional interactions occurring between host- and phage-derived transcripts that together determine the phage-mediated lysis program.
2023-11-23 | GSE247767 | GEO
Project description:RNAseq of VP882 and VP882 ∆vpdS phage activation in V. cholerae
| PRJNA1040289 | ENA
Project description:Many, if not all, bacteria use quorum sensing (QS) to control gene expression and collective behaviours, and more recently QS has also been discovered in bacteriophages (phages). Phages can produce communication molecules of their own, or “listen in” on the host’s communication processes, in order to switch between lytic and lysogenic modes of infection. In this project, we studied the interaction of Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of cholera disease, with the lysogenic vibriophage VP882. The lytic cycle of VP882 is induced by the QS molecule DPO (3,5-dimethylpyrazin-2-ol), however, the global regulatory consequences of DPO-mediated VP882 activation have remained unclear.
2023-11-23 | GSE247770 | GEO
Project description:RIPseq of VP882 phage activation in V. cholerae
| PRJNA1040285 | ENA
Project description:RILseq of VP882 phage activation in V. cholerae
| PRJNA1040286 | ENA
Project description:Vibrio cholerae phage Genome sequencing
| PRJNA240650 | ENA
Project description:To determine transcriptome differences in Vibrio cholerae when grown as planktonic and biofilm cultures, whole-genome level transcriptional profiling was performed using RNAseq analysis. Transcriptomes of biofim and planktonic cultures were compared in this study.
2020-05-28 | GSE135887 | GEO
Project description:These experiments were performed to show a serogroup conversion of Vibrio cholerae from O1 to O139. For this purpose, V. cholerae O1 El Tor (A1552) was grown on crab shell fragments to induce natural competence for transformation. Purified DNA (4 ug each) from strain MO10, an O139 serogroup strain, was added after 24h and the cells were further grown for 24h. After detachment from the crab shell fragments, bacteria were poured into soft-agar and overlaid onto LB plates. Mukerjeee's El Tor phage V (a gift of Dr. M.S. Islam) was dropped onto the surface of the bacteria containing soft-agar. The plaques formed by killing non-transformed A1552 cells possessed resistant clones which were picked and further selected for opaque morphotype and agglutination by O139-specific antiserum. Four clones were selected from each independent experiment and analyzed by microarray hybridization (BioPrime. Array CGH Genomic Labeling from Invitrogen). Two microarray replicates were done per clone. Strain Names: ApO139#2 / ApO139#4 / ApO139#6 / ApO139#8 are four clones analyzed after the first experiment; AIIpO139#3 / AIIpO139#4 / AIIpO139#5 / AIIpO139#6 are four clones analyzed after the second independent experiment. Two MA replicates for each clone were done. CGHs of A1552 versus MO10 are provided as control.
2007-08-01 | E-SMDB-3752 | biostudies-arrayexpress