Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1059607 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR27422684_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27422684_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27422685_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27422685_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27422686_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized systems-based analysis of cellular pathways. The goals of this study are to compare transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) of intestinal progenitor cells in Drosophila wild type and Sc overexpressed midgut. Methods: mRNA profiles of intestinal progenitor cells isolated from 2-day-old wild-type (Ctrl) and Sc overexpressed(ScOE) Drosophila midgut were generated by deep sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 4000. Results:
2018-02-02 | GSE102569 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized systems-based analysis of cellular pathways. The goals of this study are to compare transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) of intestinal progenitor cells in Drosophila wild type and Sox21a mutant midgut. Methods: mRNA profiles of intestinal progenitor cells isolated from 7-day-old wild-type (WT) and Sox21a knockout (Sox21a−/−) Drosophila midgut were generated by deep sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 4000. Results: Each sequencing experiment generated an average 11.18 million raw reads, and 86% was successfully mapped for each experiment. 7608 transcripts were identified in the progenitor cells of WT and Sox21a−/− Drosophila midgut with TopHat workflow. 389 genes of the transcripts showed differential expression between the WT and Sox21a−/− progenitor cells, with a fold change ≥2.0 and p value <0.05. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes uncovered several as yet uncharacterized genes that may contribute to intestinal function.
2017-02-14 | GSE76621 | GEO
Project description:Comparisons between EcR mutant midgut and a reference control sample from mixed-stage normal midgut Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE540 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: We isolated Drosophila midgut cells : Delta+ intestinal stem cells (ISCs), Su(H)+enteroblasts (EBs), Esg+ cells (ISC+EB), Myo1A+Enterocytes (ECs), Pros+Enteroendocrine cells (EEs) and How+Visceral muscle cells (VM) from whole midguts to identify stem cell specific genes and study cell type specificities of midgut cells. We also isolated all the cell types from the 5 major regions (R1-R5) of the Drosophila midgut to study differences in cells in different regions. Methods: 3-7 day old female flies were dissected. Flies with GFP/YFP marking different cell types (using the GAL4-UAS system) were used to separate cells of the midgut.The midguts were dissociated with Elastase and FACS sorted using FACS AriaIII. RNA was extracted, amplified and sequenced. Whole midgut samples were sequenced on Illumina GAIIX and regional cell populations were sequenced on HiSeq2000. Methods:Raw fastqc reads were mapped to the Drosophila genome (Drosophila_melanogaster.BDGP5.70.dna.toplevel.fa) using Tophat 2.0.9 at default (using boost_1_54_0, bowtie2-2.1.0, samtools-0.1.19). Methods: For differential expression analysis, DESeq (p-value adjustment 0.05 by method Benjamini-Hochberg) was used. The reads were normalized also to Reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM). Results: More than 50% of the genome is expressed in the adult midgut (FlyAtlas- Chintapalli et al., 2007), of these genes about 50% (2457) were differentially expressed (DE) between all 4 cell types (ISCs, EBs, ECs and EEs) atleast 2 folds with 95% confidence Results: 159 genes that were specifically enriched in ISCs, 509 genes were specifically repressed in ISCs Conclusions: Our study represents the first detailed analysis of Drosophila intestinal cell transcriptomes, with biologic replicates, generated by RNA-seq technology.Our data facilitates comparative investigations of expression profiles of cells and reveals novel stem cell genes. Further region specific profiling adds precision to the analysis of variances in the midgut regions. We identify transcriptional regulators and regional transcription factors which modulate the midgut physiology. The dataset will be a great resource for hypothesis generation, tool building and fine tuned studies on the Drosophila midgut. mRNA profiles of Drosophila intestinal cells from whole midguts and midgut regions were generated by Deep Sequencing. Whole midgut profiles were generated in triplicates (Illumina GAIIx, 72 bp read length) and regional cell type profiles were genrated in duplicates (HiSeq 2000, 50bp read length).
2015-05-23 | E-GEOD-61361 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A midgut reference sample is compared to midgut samples taken at various stages before (18h, 4h), at (0h), and after (2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h) puparium formation. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE543 | GEO
Project description:Comparisons between EcR mutant midgut and a reference control sample from mixed-stage normal midgut Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-540 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Purpose: We isolated Drosophila midgut cells : Delta+ intestinal stem cells (ISCs), Su(H)+enteroblasts (EBs), Esg+ cells (ISC+EB), Myo1A+Enterocytes (ECs), Pros+Enteroendocrine cells (EEs) and How+Visceral muscle cells (VM) from whole midguts to identify stem cell specific genes and study cell type specificities of midgut cells. We also isolated all the cell types from the 5 major regions (R1-R5) of the Drosophila midgut to study differences in cells in different regions. Methods: 3-7 day old female flies were dissected. Flies with GFP/YFP marking different cell types (using the GAL4-UAS system) were used to separate cells of the midgut.The midguts were dissociated with Elastase and FACS sorted using FACS AriaIII. RNA was extracted, amplified and sequenced. Whole midgut samples were sequenced on Illumina GAIIX and regional cell populations were sequenced on HiSeq2000. Methods:Raw fastqc reads were mapped to the Drosophila genome (Drosophila_melanogaster.BDGP5.70.dna.toplevel.fa) using Tophat 2.0.9 at default (using boost_1_54_0, bowtie2-2.1.0, samtools-0.1.19). Methods: For differential expression analysis, DESeq (p-value adjustment 0.05 by method Benjamini-Hochberg) was used. The reads were normalized also to Reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM). Results: More than 50% of the genome is expressed in the adult midgut (FlyAtlas- Chintapalli et al., 2007), of these genes about 50% (2457) were differentially expressed (DE) between all 4 cell types (ISCs, EBs, ECs and EEs) atleast 2 folds with 95% confidence Results: 159 genes that were specifically enriched in ISCs, 509 genes were specifically repressed in ISCs Conclusions: Our study represents the first detailed analysis of Drosophila intestinal cell transcriptomes, with biologic replicates, generated by RNA-seq technology.Our data facilitates comparative investigations of expression profiles of cells and reveals novel stem cell genes. Further region specific profiling adds precision to the analysis of variances in the midgut regions. We identify transcriptional regulators and regional transcription factors which modulate the midgut physiology. The dataset will be a great resource for hypothesis generation, tool building and fine tuned studies on the Drosophila midgut.
2015-05-23 | GSE61361 | GEO
Project description:We performed an mRNA-sequencing experiment using Drosophila midgut to find uracil-induced signaling pathways and biological processes in response to uracil. The sequenced reads from Illumina Hiseq2000 that passed quality filters were mapped to Drosophila genome (NCBI build 5.3) using Tophat and then quantitatively analyzed by HTseq at the gene level. By comparing uracil-treated and non-treated samplesl, we profiled uracil-dependent gene expression changes.
2014-12-31 | GSE57941 | GEO
Project description:Comparisons between whole animal and epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system tissues at approximately 18 hours before pupariation. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE541 | GEO