Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Evaluation of Commercial RNA Extraction Kits for Long-Read Metatranscriptomics in Soil

PROVIDER: PRJNA1079547 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR28223352_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28223353_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28223354_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28223355_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28223356_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 39

Similar Datasets

Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods in Yeast on RNA-Seq: Implications for Differential Expression and Meta-Analyses

Project description:Based on the different chemistries of phenol extraction of RNA versus commercial kits, we hypothesized that certain species of mRNA may be preferentially extracted depending upon method, which could masquerade as differential expression in downstream RNA-seq experiments. We tested this using Saccharomyces cerevisiae samples that only differ in the RNA isolation method: a "standard" hot phenol extraction, versus two different commercial RNA isolation kits. While the kits had comparable relative mRNA abundances, samples isolated with hot phenol had higher relative abundance of mRNAs encoding membrane proteins. We hypothesize that hot phenol better solubilizes mRNAs associated with cellular membranes. We then compared the effects of each RNA isolation method on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts, using the yeast heat shock response a test case. The method of RNA isolation had little effect on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts. Thus, experiments within a single lab are unlikely to be affected by the choice of RNA isolation method as long as the same method is used throughout an experiment. For meta-analyses however, researchers should be cautious if trying to compare experiments where the RNA isolation methods differ.

2019-08-07 | GSE135430 | GEO

rs11-07_opine2 - septante soil - Transcriptomic changes induced by opine production in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in natural soil

Project description:rs11-07_opine2 - septante soil - Transcriptomic changes induced by opine production in Arabidopsis thaliana grown in natural soil - Arabidopsis thalian Col- line was transformed in order to obtain transgenic lines that produce opine compound (octopine and mannopine). Transgenic lines producing respectively octopine and mannopine and the WT line were grown in greenhouse under long-day condition in pots containing half commercial compost and half soil of la Mérantaise and watered with water. Whole plant aged of one month were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The plants were ground with a mortar an pestls and RNA extraction was performed with the RNeasy extraction kit (QIAGEN) with cristal of PVP. The RNA concentration was measured on a NANODrop spectrophotometer.

2017-01-05 | GSE93121 | GEO

Project description:Systematic Cross-biospecimen evaluation of DNA extraction kits for long- and short-read multi-metagenomic sequencing studies

| PRJNA802336 | ENA

Project description:Evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for analysing microbial diversity in the pig gastrointestinal tract

| PRJEB9411 | ENA

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica

Project description:Evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for implementation of rapid Nanopore sequencing for routine diagnostic laboratories

| PRJNA768992 | ENA

Mock communities - ONT

Project description:Evaluation of DNA extraction kits for long-read shotgun metagenomics using Oxford Nanopore sequencing for rapid taxonomic and antimicrobial resistance detection

| PRJEB75510 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of soil DNA extraction for long read metagenomics

| PRJNA1090675 | ENA

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

Systematic assessment of commercially available low-input miRNA library preparation kits

Project description:We compared the performance of six commercial kits (QIAseq, SMARTer, CATS, CleanTag, srLp, TailorMix) capable of handling <100ng total RNA input for miRNA detection sensitivity, reliability, titration response and ability to detect differentially expressed miRNAs at different amounts of synthetic miRNAs. We observed differences in detection sensitivity between the kits, but none were able to detect the full repertoire of expected miRNAs. The reliability within the replicates of all kits was good, while larger differences were observed between the kits, although none could accurately quantify the majority of miRNAs.

2019-09-27 | GSE133719 | GEO

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.

2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data