Swi4-dependent SWI4 transcription couples cell size to cell cycle commitment
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1174123 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR31029524.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31029525.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31029526.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31029527.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31029528.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 14 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Growth-dependent accumulation of the limiting SBF transcription factor, composed of Swi4 and Swi6, occurs in G1 phase in budding yeast and is limiting for commitment to division, termed Start. Here we measure size-dependence of Swi4 protein copy number under different genetic contexts using a quantitative scanning number and brightness technique. Mutation of SBF binding sites in the SWI4 promoter or disruption of SBF activation resulted in ~33-50% decrease in Swi4 accumulation rate and concordantly increased cell size at Start. Ectopic inducible expression of Swi4 in G1 phase cells increased production of Swi4 from the endogenous promoter, upregulated transcription of the G1/S regulon, and accelerated Start. Despite the potential for Swi4 positive feedback, G1 phase Swi4 accumulation was linear unless the Whi5 transcriptional repressor was inactivated. A threshold model in which Swi4 titrates SBF binding sites in G1/S promoters predicted the effects of nutrients, ploidy, and G1/S regulatory mutations on cell size. These results exemplify how transcription factor auto-production can refine a cell state transition.
2025-02-14 | GSE279708 | GEO
Project description:In the unicellular eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cln3–cyclin-dependent kinase activity enables Start, the irreversible commitment to the cell division cycle. However, the concentration of Cln3 has been paradoxically considered to remain constant during G1, due to the presumed scaling of its production rate with cell size dynamics. Measuring metabolic and biosynthetic activity during cell cycle progression in single cells, we found that cells exhibit pulses in their protein production rate. Rather than scaling with cell size dynamics, these pulses follow the intrinsic metabolic dynamics, peaking around Start. Using a viral- based bicistronic construct and targeted proteomics to measure Cln3 at the single-cell and population levels, we show that the differential scaling between protein production and cell size leads to a temporal increase in Cln3 concentration, and passage through Start. This differential scaling causes Start in both daughter and mother cells across growth conditions. Thus, uncou- pling between two fundamental physiological parameters drives cell cycle commitment.
2022-05-16 | PXD029959 | Pride
Project description:In the unicellular eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cln3-CDK activity enables Start, the irreversible commitment to the cell division cycle. However, the concentration of Cln3 has been paradoxically considered to remain constant during G1, due to the presumed scaling of its production rate with cell size dynamics. Measuring metabolic and biosynthetic activity during cell cycle progression in single cells, we found that cells exhibit pulses in protein production rate, which do not scale with cell size dynamics, but -following the intrinsic metabolic dynamics- peak around Start. Using a viral-based bicistronic construct and targeted proteomics to measure Cln3 at the single-cell and population level, we show that the differential scaling between protein production and cell size leads to a temporal increase in Cln3 concentration, and passage through Start. This differential scaling causes Start in both daughter and mother cells, across growth conditions. Thus, uncoupling between two fundamental physiological parameters drives cell cycle commitment.
2019-10-29 | PXD015327 | Pride
Project description:CNOT6L Couples the Selective Degradation of Maternal Transcriptsto Meiotic Cell Cycle Progression in Mouse Oocyte
| PRJNA486092 | ENA
Project description:In most species, size homeostasis appears to be exerted in late G1 phase as cells commit to division, called Start in yeast and the Restriction Point in metazoans. This size threshold couples cell growth to division and thereby establishes long-term size homeostasis. Our former investigations have shown that hundreds of genes markedly altered cell size under homeostatic growth conditions in the opportunistic yeast Candida albicans, but surprisingly only few of these overlapped with size control genes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we investigated one of the divergent potent size regulators in C. albicans, the Myb-like HTH transcription factor Dot6. Our data demonstrated that Dot6 is a negative regulator of Start and also acts as a transcriptional activator of ribosome biogenesis (Ribi) genes. Genetic epistasis uncovered that Dot6 interacted with the master transcriptional regulator of the G1 machinery, SBF complex, but not with the Ribi and cell size regulators Sch9, Sfp1 and p38/Hog1. Dot6 was required for carbon-source modulation of cell size and it is regulated at the level of nuclear localization by TOR pathway. Our findings support a model where Dot6 acts as a hub that integrate directly growth cues via the TOR pathway to control the commitment to mitotic division at G1.
2018-08-28 | GSE119089 | GEO
Project description:Yeast cells must grow to a critical size before committing to division. It is unknown how size is measured. We find that as cells grow, mRNAs for some cell cycle activators scale faster than size, increasing in concentration, while mRNAs for some inhibitors scale slower than size, decreasing in concentration. Size-scaled gene expression could cause an increasing ratio of activators to inhibitors with size, triggering cell cycle entry. Consistent with this, expression of the CLN2 activator from the promoter of the WHI5 inhibitor, or vice versa, interfered with cell size homeostasis, yielding a broader distribution of cell sizes. We suggest that size homeostasis comes from differential scaling of gene expression with size. Such regulation of gene expression as a function of cell size could affect many cellular processes.
2020-02-16 | GSE145206 | GEO
Project description:This model is decribed in the article:
Dilution and titration of cell-cycle regulators may control cell size in budding yeast
Frank S. Heldt, Reece Lunstone, John J. Tyson, Bela Novak
PLoS Comput Biol, October 2018, 14(10), e1006548, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006548
Abstract:
The size of a cell sets the scale for all biochemical processes within it, thereby affecting cellular fitness and survival. Hence, cell size needs to be kept within certain limits and relatively constant over multiple generations. However, how cells measure their size and use this information to regulate growth and division remains controversial. Here, we present two mechanistic mathematical models of the budding yeast (S. cerevisiae) cell cycle to investigate competing hypotheses on size control: inhibitor dilution and titration of nuclear sites. Our results suggest that an inhibitor-dilution mechanism, in which cell growth dilutes the transcriptional inhibitor Whi5 against the constant activator Cln3, can facilitate size homeostasis. This is achieved by utilising a positive feedback loop to establish a fixed size threshold for the START transition, which efficiently couples cell growth to cell cycle progression. Yet, we show that inhibitor dilution cannot reproduce the size of mutants that alter the cell’s overall ploidy and WHI5 gene copy number. By contrast, size control through titration of Cln3 against a constant number of genomic binding sites for the transcription factor SBF recapitulates both size homeostasis and the size of these mutant strains. Moreover, this model produces an imperfect ‘sizer’ behaviour in G1 and a ‘timer’ in S/G2/M, which combine to yield an ‘adder’ over the whole cell cycle; an observation recently made in experiments. Hence, our model connects these phenomenological data with the molecular details of the cell cycle, providing a systems-level perspective of budding yeast size control.
2024-09-02 | BIOMD0000000856 | BioModels
Project description:This model is decribed in the article:
Dilution and titration of cell-cycle regulators may control cell size in budding yeast
Frank S. Heldt, Reece Lunstone, John J. Tyson, Bela Novak
PLoS Comput Biol, October 2018, 14(10), e1006548, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006548
Abstract:
The size of a cell sets the scale for all biochemical processes within it, thereby affecting cellular fitness and survival. Hence, cell size needs to be kept within certain limits and relatively constant over multiple generations. However, how cells measure their size and use this information to regulate growth and division remains controversial. Here, we present two mechanistic mathematical models of the budding yeast (S. cerevisiae) cell cycle to investigate competing hypotheses on size control: inhibitor dilution and titration of nuclear sites. Our results suggest that an inhibitor-dilution mechanism, in which cell growth dilutes the transcriptional inhibitor Whi5 against the constant activator Cln3, can facilitate size homeostasis. This is achieved by utilising a positive feedback loop to establish a fixed size threshold for the START transition, which efficiently couples cell growth to cell cycle progression. Yet, we show that inhibitor dilution cannot reproduce the size of mutants that alter the cell’s overall ploidy and WHI5 gene copy number. By contrast, size control through titration of Cln3 against a constant number of genomic binding sites for the transcription factor SBF recapitulates both size homeostasis and the size of these mutant strains. Moreover, this model produces an imperfect ‘sizer’ behaviour in G1 and a ‘timer’ in S/G2/M, which combine to yield an ‘adder’ over the whole cell cycle; an observation recently made in experiments. Hence, our model connects these phenomenological data with the molecular details of the cell cycle, providing a systems-level perspective of budding yeast size control.
2019-01-09 | MODEL1803220002 | BioModels
Project description:Sibling Cell size contributes to cell cycle progression and cell fate decisions in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells
| PRJNA1329273 | ENA
Project description:Abscission couples cell division to embryonic stem cell fate
| PRJNA594885 | ENA