A boundary-defining protein facilitates megabase-scale regulatory chromosomal loops in Drosophila neurons [Hi-C]
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1208979 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR31952961_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31952961_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31952962_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31952962_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR31952963_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 20 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:A boundary-defining protein facilitates megabase-scale regulatory chromosomal loops in Drosophila neurons [ChIP-seq]
| PRJNA1208983 | ENA
Project description:Regulatory elements, such as enhancers and silencers, control transcription by establishing physical proximity to target gene promoters. Neurons in flies and mammals exhibit long-range three-dimensional genome contacts, proposed to connect genes with distal regulatory elements. However, the relevance of these contacts for neuronal gene transcription and the mechanisms underlying their specificity necessitate further investigation. Here, we precisely disrupt several long-range contacts in fly neurons, demonstrating their importance for megabase-range gene regulation and uncovering a hierarchical process in their formation. We further reveal an essential role for the chromosomal boundary-forming protein Cp190 in anchoring many long-range contacts, highlighting a mechanistic interplay between boundary and loop formation. Finally, we develop an unbiased proteomics-based method to systematically identify factors required for specific long-range contacts. Our findings underscore the essential role of architectural proteins such as Cp190 in cell-type-specific genome organization enabling specialized neuronal transcriptional programs.
2025-04-11 | GSE286361 | GEO
Project description:Meta-loops are large chromosomal loops that connect specific neuronal genes with non-coding DNA elements, enabling megabase-range regulation of gene transcription in fly neurons. To reveal how highly specific meta-loop interactions form, we developed an unbiased approach to identify proteins from Drosophila adult head extracts that associate with four meta-loop anchors and a control. This approach revealed both known and new factors involved in meta-loop formation, including Lola-I which we functionally validate as a meta-loop anchor binding protein required a small subset of meta-loops.
2025-04-11 | PXD060311 | Pride
Project description:Regulatory elements, such as enhancers and silencers, control transcription by establishing physical proximity to target gene promoters. Neurons in flies and mammals exhibit long-range three-dimensional genome contacts, proposed to connect genes with distal regulatory elements. However, the relevance of these contacts for neuronal gene transcription and the mechanisms underlying their specificity necessitate further investigation. Here, we precisely disrupt several long-range contacts in fly neurons, demonstrating their importance for megabase-range gene regulation and uncovering a hierarchical process in their formation. We further reveal an essential role for the chromosomal boundary-forming protein Cp190 in anchoring many long-range contacts, highlighting a mechanistic interplay between boundary and loop formation. Finally, we develop an unbiased proteomics-based method to systematically identify factors required for specific long-range contacts. Our findings underscore the essential role of architectural proteins such as Cp190 in cell-type-specific genome organization enabling specialized neuronal transcriptional programs.
2025-04-11 | GSE286359 | GEO
Project description:Mammalian genomes are partitioned into sub-megabase to megabase-sized units of preferential interactions called topologically associating domains or TADs, which are likely important for the proper implementation of gene regulatory processes. These domains provide structural scaffolds for distant cis regulatory elements to interact with their target genes within the three-dimensional nuclear space and architectural proteins such as CTCF as well as the cohesin complex participate in the formation of the boundaries between them. However, the importance of the genomic context in providing a given DNA sequence the capacity to act as a boundary element remains to be fully investigated. To address this question, we randomly relocated a topological boundary functionally associated with the mouse HoxD gene cluster and show that it can indeed act similarly outside its initial genomic context. In particular, the relocated DNA segment recruited the required architectural proteins and induced a significant depletion of contacts between genomic regions located across the integration site. The host chromatin landscape was re-organized, with the splitting of the TAD wherein the boundary had integrated. These results provide evidence that topological boundaries can function independently of their site of origin, under physiological conditions during mouse development.
2021-07-05 | GSE166578 | GEO
Project description:Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains (“TADs”) in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop (and an unanchored loop). In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of Micro-C to analyze how TADs are organized and experimental manipulations of the even-skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the “loop-extrusion” and the “boundary-pairing” models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model and instead suggest that endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their neighbors, either head-to-head, or head-to-tail.
2024-02-25 | GSE222999 | GEO
Project description:R-loops are features of chromatin consisting of a strand of DNA hybridized to RNA, as well as the expelled complementary DNA strand. R-loops are enriched at promoters where they have recently been shown to have important roles in modifying gene expression. However, the location of promoter-associated R-loops and the genomic domains they perturb to modify gene expression remain unclear. To resolve this issue, we developed a bisulfite-based approach, bisDRIP-seq, to map R-loops across the genome at near-nucleotide resolution in MCF-7 cells. We found the location of promoter-associated R-loops is dependent on the presence of introns. In intron-containing genes, R-loops are bounded between the transcription start site and the first exon-intron junction. In intronless genes, the 3' boundary displays gene-specific heterogeneity. Moreover, intronless genes are often associated with promoter-associated R-loop formation. Together, these studies provide a high-resolution map of R-loops and identify gene structure as a critical determinant of R-loop formation.
2017-10-25 | GSE98886 | GEO
Project description:Animal genomes fold into contact domains defined by enhanced internal contact frequencies with debated functions in establishing independent gene regulatory domains. A large fraction of contact domains in mammals are formed by stalling of chromosomal loop-extruding cohesin by CTCF at domain boundaries. 90% of domain boundaries in Drosophila form CTCF-independently, and other proteins were proposed to form chromosomal loops with dual functions of segregating promoters from inappropriate regulatory elements and connecting distal regulatory elements to their correct targets. Here, we genetically ablate the ubiquitous boundary-associated factor Cp190 and assess impacts on genome folding and transcriptional regulation in embryos. Our results reveal that Cp190 is a major factor required for contact domain boundary formation and gene insulation in Drosophila.
2022-05-30 | PXD027795 | Pride
Project description:Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains (“TADs”) in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop (and an unanchored loop). In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the “loop-extrusion” and the “boundary-pairing” models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head, or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely involve loop extrusion.
2024-04-04 | GSE263229 | GEO
Project description:Mammalian genomes are partitioned into sub-megabase to megabase-sized units of preferential interactions called topologically associating domains or TADs, which are likely important for the proper implementation of gene regulatory processes. These domains provide structural scaffolds for distant cis regulatory elements to interact with their target genes within the three-dimensional nuclear space and architectural proteins such as CTCF as well as the cohesin complex participate in the formation of the boundaries between them. However, the importance of the genomic context in providing a given DNA sequence the capacity to act as a boundary element remains to be fully investigated. To address this question, we randomly relocated a topological boundary functionally associated with the mouse HoxD gene cluster and show that it can indeed act similarly outside its initial genomic context. In particular, the relocated DNA segment recruited the required architectural proteins and induced a significant depletion of contacts between genomic regions located across the integration site. The host chromatin landscape was re-organized, with the splitting of the TAD wherein the boundary had integrated. These results provide evidence that topological boundaries can function independently of their site of origin, under physiological conditions during mouse development.
2021-07-05 | GSE166581 | GEO