Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA214015 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR948366.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR948367.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR948368.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR948369.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR948370.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 76 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers
| PRJNA189244 | ENA
Project description:Arrays of regularly spaced nucleosomes dominate chromatin and are often phased, i.e., aligned at reference sites like active promoters. How distances between nucleosomes and distances between phasing sites and nucleosomes are determined remained unclear, specifically, the role of ATP dependent chromatin remodelers in it. Here, we used a genome-wide reconstitution system to probe how yeast remodelers generate phased nucleosome arrays. We find that remodelers bear a structural element named the ‘ruler’ that sets nucleosome spacing, in the order Chd1 < ISW1a < ISW2 < INO80. Structure-based mutagenesis confirmed the functional significance of the ruler element in INO80. Differences in the ruler elements of different remodelers explain the observed nucleosome array features. More generally, we propose that remodelers use their rulers to regulate the direction of nucleosome sliding in response to nucleosome density and environment, leading to nucleosome positioning relative to other nucleosomes, DNA bound factors or DNA sequence elements.
2020-02-10 | GSE140614 | GEO
Project description:Numerous nucleosome remodeling enzymes tightly regulate nucleosome positions in eukaryotic cells. Transcription and statistical positioning of nucleosomes may also contribute to proper nucleosome organization. Individual contributions remain controversial due to strong redundancy of processes acting on the nucleosome landscape. By incisive yeast genome engineering we radically decreased their redundancy. We find the transcriptional machinery to be disruptive of evenly spaced nucleosomes, and proper nucleosome density critical for their biogenesis. INO80 spaces nucleosomes in vivo and positions the first nucleosome covering genes. It requires its Arp8 and Ies2 subunits, but unexpectedly not the Nhp10 module, for spacing. Whereas H2A.Z stimulates INO80 in vitro, its presence is dispensable for INO80 +1 positioning function in vivo. DNA damage, recombination and transposon integration assays suggest that evenly spaced nucleosomes protect cells against genotoxic stress. We derive a unifying model of the biogenesis of the nucleosome landscape and suggest that it evolved not only to regulate but also to protect the genome.
2021-10-20 | GSE141007 | GEO
Project description:Nucleosome arrays begin at nucleosome-free promoter regions (NFRs) and regulate gene expression. Reconstituting such organization throughout a genome with purified proteins is a critical challenge in establishing biochemical mechanisms for chromosome assembly. Here we establish a four-step hierarchical building plan for yeast genomic nucleosome organization using only purified components: genomic DNA, histones, site-specific organizing factors Abf1 and Reb1, and the chromatin remodelers RSC, ISW2, INO80, and ISW1a. First, RSC makes NFRs by translating promoter poly(dA:dT) tracts into directional nucleosome removal. Second, +1 nucleosomes are positioned by INO80 at most genes potentially involving DNA shape, or by ISW2 using gene-specific Abf1 and Reb1. Third, INO80 or ISW2 create arrays with wide spacing. Fourth, ISW1a tightens the spacing and creates properly positioned arrays. We conclude that entire genomes use a simple set of rules and proteins, without transcription, to build a common chromatin architecture. In this study, nucleosomes were assembled using Salt Gradient Dialysis (SGD) on yeast genomic DNA library. Assembled nucleosomes were either left untreated (labelled as "SGD", control), treated with whole cell extract (WCE), mutant extracts (rsc3ts WCE, isw1 isw2 chd1 WCE), purified remodelers; singly or in combinations (RSC, ISW1a, ISW1b, ISW2, INO80, CHD1, SWI/SNF), combinations of mutant extracts and chromatin remodelers or combination of General Regulatory Factors (Abf1, Reb1) and chromatin remodelers. The resulting nucleosome positions were mapped genome-wide using MNase-(anti-H3-ChIP)-Seq.
2016-08-14 | E-GEOD-72106 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Nucleosomes in active chromatin are dynamic, but whether they have distinct structural conformations is unknown. To identify nucleosomes with alternative structures genome-wide, we used H4S47C-anchored cleavage mapping, which revealed that nucleosomes at 5% of budding yeast nucleosome positions have asymmetric histone-DNA interactions. These asymmetric interactions are enriched at nucleosome positions that flank promoters. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) sequence-based profiles of asymmetric nucleosome positions revealed a corresponding asymmetry in MNase protection near the dyad axis, suggesting that the loss of DNA contacts around H4S47 is accompanied by protection of the DNA from MNase. Chromatin immunoprecipitation mapping of selected nucleosome remodelers indicated that asymmetric nucleosomes are bound by the RSC chromatin remodeling complex, which is required for maintaining nucleosomes at asymmetric positions. These results imply that the asymmetric nucleosome-RSC complex is a metastable intermediate representing partial unwrapping and protection of nucleosomal DNA on one side of the dyad axis during chromatin remodeling. We have analyzed the chromatin landscape of the yeast genome using paired-end MNase-seq and the chromatin binding of yeast remodelers Swr1, Ino80 and RSC at base-pair resolution using native chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (N-ChIP-seq).
2014-12-04 | E-GEOD-59523 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:INO80 promotes reassembly of promoter proximal nucleosomes.
| PRJNA313529 | ENA
Project description:The structural complexity of nucleosomes underlies their functional versatility. Here we report a new type of complexity – nucleosome fragility, manifested as high sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease, in contrast to the common presumption that nucleosomes are similar in resistance to MNase digestion. Using differential MNase digestion of chromatin and high-throughput sequencing, we have identified a special group of nucleosomes termed fragile nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome, nearly one thousand of which are at previously determined “nucleosome free” loci. Nucleosome fragility is broadly implicated in multiple chromatin processes, including transcription, translocation and replication, in correspondence to specific physiological states of cells. In the environmental-stress-response genes, the presence of fragile nucleosomes prior to the occurrence of environmental changes suggests that nucleosome fragility poises genes for swift up-regulation in response to the environmental changes. We propose that nucleosome fragility underscores distinct functional statuses of the chromatin and provides a new dimension for portraying the landscape of genome organization.
2011-01-24 | GSE26412 | GEO
Project description:Chaperoning 5S RNA assembly by structural probing
| PRJNA282731 | ENA
Project description:The structural complexity of nucleosomes underlies their functional versatility. Here we report a new type of complexity – nucleosome fragility, manifested as high sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease, in contrast to the common presumption that nucleosomes are similar in resistance to MNase digestion. Using differential MNase digestion of chromatin and high-throughput sequencing, we have identified a special group of nucleosomes termed fragile nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome, nearly one thousand of which are at previously determined “nucleosome free” loci. Nucleosome fragility is broadly implicated in multiple chromatin processes, including transcription, translocation and replication, in correspondence to specific physiological states of cells. In the environmental-stress-response genes, the presence of fragile nucleosomes prior to the occurrence of environmental changes suggests that nucleosome fragility poises genes for swift up-regulation in response to the environmental changes. We propose that nucleosome fragility underscores distinct functional statuses of the chromatin and provides a new dimension for portraying the landscape of genome organization. Comparing nucleosome occupancy under different MNase digestion levels and growth conditions.
2011-01-24 | E-GEOD-26412 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: Chromatin remodeling complexes facilitate the access of enzymes that mediate transcription, replication or repair of DNA by modulating nucleosome position and/or composition. Ino80 is the DNA-dependent Snf2-like ATPase subunit of a complex whose nucleosome remodeling activity requires actin-related proteins, Arp4, Arp5 and Arp8, as well as two RuvB-like DNA helicase subunits. Budding yeast mutants deficient for Ino80 function are not only hypersensitive to reagents that induce DNA double strand breaks, but also to those that impair replication fork progression. Results: To understand why ino80 mutants are sensitive to agents that perturb DNA replication, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation to map the binding sites of the Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex on four budding yeast chromosomes. We found that Ino80 and Arp5 binding sites coincide with origins of DNA replication and tRNA genes. In addition, Ino80 was bound at 67% of the promoters of genes that are sensitive to ino80 mutation. When replication forks were arrested near origins in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), the presence of the Ino80 complex at stalled forks and at unfired origins increased dramatically. Importantly, the resumption of DNA replication after release from a HU block was impaired in the absence of Ino80 activity. Mutant cells accumulated double-strand breaks as they attempted to restart replication. Consistently, ino80-deficient cells, although proficient for checkpoint activation, delay recovery from the checkpoint response. Conclusions: The Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex is enriched at stalled replication forks where it promotes the resumption of replication upon recovery from fork arrest. Keywords: ChIP-chip
2008-04-10 | GSE9420 | GEO