Glyphodes pyloalis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA385884 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR5520570_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5520570_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5520571_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5520571_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 4 of 4 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Glyphodes pyloalis isolate:Yizhou, Qingyuan County Genome sequencing and assembly
| PRJNA1052590 | ENA
Project description:NLRC5 is a member of the NLR family of proteins. The observation that NLRC5 is found in the nucleus prompted us to perform a gene array to identify putative target genes of NLRC5. We generated Jurkat T cell lines that stably express either the wild-type or mutant forms of NLRC5 harboring mutations in the nucleotide binding domain (NBD): Walker A (deficient in nucleotide binding), Walker B (deficient in nucleotide hydrolysis), and the combined Walker AB, carrying both mutations. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to create the NLRC5 NBD mutants: Walker A (K234A), Walker B (E311Q), and Walker AB (both mutations).
2010-06-30 | GSE22064 | GEO
Project description:NLRC5 is a member of the NLR family of proteins. The observation that NLRC5 is found in the nucleus prompted us to perform a gene array to identify putative target genes of NLRC5. We generated Jurkat T cell lines that stably express either the wild-type or mutant forms of NLRC5 harboring mutations in the nucleotide binding domain (NBD): Walker A (deficient in nucleotide binding), Walker B (deficient in nucleotide hydrolysis), and the combined Walker AB, carrying both mutations. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to create the NLRC5 NBD mutants: Walker A (K234A), Walker B (E311Q), and Walker AB (both mutations). We compared the expression profiles of Jurkat T cells expressing GFP, or the GFP-tagged wild-type, Walker A, Walker B, or Walker AB forms of NLRC5. GFP and the Walker A and Walker AB forms of NLRC5 were considered functionally inactive, while the wild-type and Walker B forms of NLRC5 were considered functionally active. These groups were used as biological replicates to assess the effect of NLRC5 activity on gene expression.
2010-07-30 | E-GEOD-22064 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Just as animal monozygotic twins can experience different environmental conditions by being reared apart, individual genetically-identical trees of the genus Populus can also be exposed to contrasting environmental conditions by being grown in different locations. As such, clonally-propagated Populus trees provide an opportunity to interrogate the impact of individual environmental history on current response to environmental stimuli. To test the hypothesis that current responses to an environmental stimulus, drought, are contingent on environmental history, the transcriptome-level drought responses of three economically important hybrid genotypes: DN34 (Populus deltoides x P. nigra); Walker (P. deltoides var. occidentalis x (P. laurifolia x P. nigra)); and, Okanese (‘Walker’ x (P. laurifolia x P. nigra)) derived from two different locations were compared. Strikingly, differences in transcript abundance patterns in response to drought were based on differences in geographic origin of clones for two of the three genotypes. This observation was most pronounced for the genotypes with the longest time since establishment and last common propagation. Differences in genome-wide DNA methylation paralleled the transcriptome level trends, where the clones with the most divergent transcriptomes and clone history had the most marked differences in the extent of total DNA methylation, suggesting an epigenetic basis for the clone-history-dependent transcriptome divergence. The data provide insights into the interplay between genotype and environment in the ecologically and economically important Populus genus, with implications for both the industrial application of Populus trees, and the evolution and persistence of these important tree species. 72 arrays total. 2 time points. 2 water regimes. 3 biological replicates per treatment
2011-05-01 | E-GEOD-27693 | biostudies-arrayexpress