Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Cicer

ABSTRACT: Whole genome sequencing WGS of 229 wild Cicer genomes

PROVIDER: PRJNA416007 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR6242250_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6242250_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6242260_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6242260_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR6242270_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 791

Similar Datasets

Small RNA Solexa sequencing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Project description:The total RNA were extracted from pooled tissues of leaves and flowers from several plants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then small RNAs ranging in 18–30 nucleotides were size fractionated electrophoretically, isolated from the gel, ligated with the 5′ and 3′ RNA adapters. The ligated product was reverse transcribed and subsequently amplified using 10–12 PCR cycles. The purified PCR product was sequenced using Illumina Genome Analyzer II. The qualified reads were used to predict microRNAs and phased small interfering RNAs from chickpea. Identification of microRNAs and phased small inferfering RNAs in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) by analyzing small RNA sequencing profiles of leaves and flowers using Illumina GAII.

2015-05-08 | E-GEOD-62216 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Cicer

Project description:Transcriptome sequencing of wild and cultivated Cicer species

| PRJNA436616 | ENA

Cicer

Project description:Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) of 93 diverse wild Cicer accessions

| PRJNA279827 | ENA

Cicer arietinum

Project description:Cicer arietinum Genome sequencing

| PRJNA529655 | ENA

Small RNA Solexa sequencing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

2015-05-08 | GSE62216 | GEO

sWGS on paired cfDNA and tissue DNA from pediatric cancer patients

Project description:We performed shallow whole genome sequencing (WGS) on circulating free (cf)DNA extracted from plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and shallow WGS on the tissue DNA extracted from the biopsy in order to evaluate the correlation between the two biomaterials. After library construction and sequencing (Hiseq3000 or Ion Proton), copy number variations were called with WisecondorX.

2021-11-17 | E-MTAB-10548 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Cicer arietinum

Project description:Cicer arietinum haplotype 2 genome sequencing

| PRJNA961901 | ENA

Cicer arietinum

Project description:Cicer arietinum Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA175619 | ENA

Evaluation of copy number variation detection between high-resolution array CGH and low-coverage short-insert and mate-pair whole-genome sequencing

Project description:In principle, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the human genome even at low coverage offers higher resolution for genomic copy number variation (CNV) detection compared to array-based technologies, which is currently the first-tier approach in clinical cytogenetics. There are, however, obstacles in replacing array-based CNV detection with that of low-coverage WGS such as cost, turnaround time, and lack of systematic performance comparisons. With technological advances in WGS in terms of library preparation, instrument platforms, and data analysis algorithms, obstacles imposed by cost and turnaround time are fading. However, a systematic performance comparison between array and low-coverage WGS-based CNV detection has yet to be performed. Here, we compared the CNV detection capabilities between WGS (short-insert, 3kb-, and 5kb-mate-pair libraries) at 1X, 3X, and 5X coverages and standardly used high-resolution arrays in the genome of 1000-Genomes-Project CEU genome NA12878. CNV detection was performed using standard analysis methods, and the results were then compared to a list of Gold Standard NA12878 CNVs distilled from the 1000-Genomes Project. Overall, low-coverage WGS is able to detect drastically more (approximately 5 fold more on average) Gold Standard CNVs compared to arrays and is accompanied with fewer CNV calls without secondary validation. Furthermore, we also show that WGS (at ≥1X coverage) is able to detect all seven validated deletions larger than 100 kb in the NA12878 genome whereas only one of such deletions is detected in most arrays. Finally, we show that the much larger 15 Mbp Cri-du-chat deletion can be clearly seen at even 1X coverage from short-insert WGS.

2018-06-26 | GSE105092 | GEO

Cicer

Project description:Genotyping by sequencing GBS of 2139 F2 hybrid accessions derived from crossing cultivated ICCV96029 by wild accessions of both Cicer reticulatum and Cicer echinospermum

| PRJNA507624 | ENA

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data