Gene expression profiles of CD34+ cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome CAA or AML
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA422058 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:To identifying candidate genes which may assist in furthering our knowledge of the mechanisms of the development and progression of MDS AML or CAA. Or finding biomarkers in the future, facilitating the diagnosis of MDS, AML or CAA. Gene expression profiles in the hematopoietic cells of MDS patients have been studied using microarray
2017-12-13 | GSE107968 | GEO
Project description:Microarray analysis with 40,000 cDNA gene chip arrays determined differential gene expression profiles (GEPs) in CD34+ marrow cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients compared to normal individuals. Using focused bioinformatics analyses, we found 1175 genes significantly differentially expressed by MDS vs Normal, requiring a minimum of 39 genes to separately classify these patients. Major GEP differences were demonstrated between Normal and MDS patients and between several MDS subgroups: (1) those whose disease remained stable (sMDS) and those who subsequently transformed (tMDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML); (2) between del(5q) and other MDS patients. A 6-gene ‘poor risk’ signature was defined which was associated with AML transformation and provided additive prognostic information for IPSS Intermediate-1 patients. Over-expression of genes generating ribosomal proteins and for other signaling pathways was demonstrated in the tMDS patients. Comparison of del(5q) to the remaining MDS patients showed 1924 differentially expressed genes, with under-expression of 1014 genes, 11 of which were within the 5q31-32 Commonly Deleted Region. These data demonstrated (1) GEPs distinguishing MDS patients from normal and between those with differing clinical outcomes (tMDS vs sMDS) and cytogenetics [eg, del(5q)] ; and (2) molecular criteria refining prognostic categorization and associated biologic processes in MDS. Gene expression profiles from CD34+ cells of 35 MDS subjects and 6 Normals were compared.
2009-10-31 | E-GEOD-18366 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The label-free quantitative proteome was generated for 42 primary AML patient samples enriched for CD34+ cells (or mononuclear cells in the case of NPMcyt sameples) and as controls 6 mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells were included. Furthermore, 6 AML cell lines were included, and also primary mesenchymal stem cells grown under normaoxia or hypoxia were included.
2022-03-15 | PXD030463 | Pride
Project description:The label-free quantitative proteome was generated for 30 primary AML patient samples enriched for CD34+ cells or CKIT+ cells in the case of NPMcyt samples. As controls 3 mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells were included.
2025-01-07 | PXD030487 | Pride
Project description:Microarray analysis with 40,000 cDNA gene chip arrays determined differential gene expression profiles (GEPs) in CD34+ marrow cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients compared to normal individuals. Using focused bioinformatics analyses, we found 1175 genes significantly differentially expressed by MDS vs Normal, requiring a minimum of 39 genes to separately classify these patients. Major GEP differences were demonstrated between Normal and MDS patients and between several MDS subgroups: (1) those whose disease remained stable (sMDS) and those who subsequently transformed (tMDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML); (2) between del(5q) and other MDS patients. A 6-gene ‘poor risk’ signature was defined which was associated with AML transformation and provided additive prognostic information for IPSS Intermediate-1 patients. Over-expression of genes generating ribosomal proteins and for other signaling pathways was demonstrated in the tMDS patients. Comparison of del(5q) to the remaining MDS patients showed 1924 differentially expressed genes, with under-expression of 1014 genes, 11 of which were within the 5q31-32 Commonly Deleted Region. These data demonstrated (1) GEPs distinguishing MDS patients from normal and between those with differing clinical outcomes (tMDS vs sMDS) and cytogenetics [eg, del(5q)] ; and (2) molecular criteria refining prognostic categorization and associated biologic processes in MDS.
2009-11-01 | GSE18366 | GEO
Project description:An increasing body of work reveals aberrant hypermethylation of genes occurring in and potentially contributing to the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies. Several of these diseases, such as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), are responsive to DNA methyltransferase inhibitors. In order to determine the extent of promoter hypermethylation in such tumors we compared the distribution of DNA methylation of 14,000 promoters in MDS and secondary AML patients enrolled in a phase I trial of 5-azacytidine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat against de novo AML patients and normal CD34+ bone marrow cells. The MDS and secondary AML patients displayed more extensive aberrant DNA methylation involving thousands of genes than did the normal CD34+ bone marrow cells or de novo AML blasts. Aberrant methylation in MDS and secondary AML tended to affect particular chromosomal regions, occurred more frequently in Alu poor genes, and included prominent involvement of genes involved in the WNT and MAPK signaling pathways. DNA methylation was also measured at days 15 and 29 after the first treatment cycle. DNA methylation was reversed at day 15 in a uniform manner throughout the genome, and this effect persisted through day 29, even without continuous administration of the study drugs. Keywords: DNA methylation profiling Direct comparison of DNA methylation in bone marrow samples from patients with Myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at baseline and after in vivo treatment with 5-azacytidine + etinostat. A comparison to de novo normal karyotype AML was also performed. Two control groups were included: one consisting of 8 CD34+ bone marrow samples from healthy donors and a second one consisting of matched CD34+ and CD34- fractions from the bone marrows of 4 healthy donors.
2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17328 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains suboptimal and many patients remain refractory or relapse upon standard chemotherapy based on nucleoside analogs plus anthracyclines. The crosstalk between AML cells and the bone marrow (BM) stroma is a major mechanism underlying therapy resistance in AML. Lenalidomide and pomalidomide, a new generation immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), possess pleiotropic anti-leukemic properties including potent immune-modulating effects and are commonly used in hematological malignances associated with intrinsic dysfunctional BM such as myelodysplastic syndromes and multiple myeloma. Whether IMiDs may improve the efficacy of current standard treatment in AML remains understudied. Here, we have exploited in vitro and in vivo preclinical AML models to analyze whether IMiDs potentiate the efficacy of AraC/Iradubicin (standard AML chemotherapy) by interfering with the BM stroma-mediated chemoresistance. We report that lenalidomide and pomalidomide have cytotoxic effects on neither AML cells nor BM-MSCs, but they increase the immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory properties of BM-MSCs. When combined with AraC and Idarubicin, IMiDs fail to circumvent BM stroma-mediated resistance of AML cells in vitro and in vivo but induce robust extramedullary mobilization of AML cells. When administered as a single agent, lenalidomide highly mobilizes AML cells, but not healthy CD34+ cells, to peripheral blood (PB) likely through specific downregulation of CXCR4 in AML blasts. Global gene expression profiling supports a migratory/mobilization gene signature in lenalidomide-treated AML blasts but not in CD34+ cells. Collectively, IMiDs mobilize AML blasts to PB through downregulation of CXCR4 but do not improve AraC/Idarubicin activity in a preclinical model of AML.
2019-05-17 | GSE106748 | GEO
Project description:Predictors of Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Minnesota
| PRJNA849699 | ENA
Project description:Predictors of Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Minnesota
| PRJNA849700 | ENA
Project description:Understanding Early Stage Myelodysplastic Syndrome Pathobiology
| PRJNA476461 | ENA