Genome-wide RUNX1 binding landscape in AMLs with RUNX1 mutation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA438279 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6833461_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6833461_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6833462_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6833462_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6833463_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 8 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Analyses of 38 AML samples through integrated multiple epigenomic analysis exposes two major epigenetic subtypes. We found that the majority of patients in an AML subtype have molecular aberrations associated with RUNX1 and splicing factors. Despite this heterogeneity, they give rise to a comparable epigenome, suggesting a common deregulation of the epigenome. Given that differentially spliced genes could result in truncated proteins and/or reduced protein levels, we speculated that mutated RUNX1 protein might deregulate the same genes targeted by mutated spliceosome factors. To explore this option, we performed genome-wide binding analysis of RUNX1 in the RUNX1 mutant (RUNX1mt) expressing AMLs, and analyzed its relationship with previous epigenetic results in our study.
2019-02-06 | GSE111821 | GEO
Project description:ETV6-RUNX1 is a first-hit mutation in childhood B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. ETV6-RUNX1 is a fusion protein which inherits the DNA-binding runt domain from RUNX1. Here we performed chromatin precipitation for native RUNX1 and ETV6-RUNX1 using RUNX1 antibodies and specifically for the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion using a V5-tag pull down.
2022-10-31 | E-MTAB-12208 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RUNX1 is a frequent target of translocations in acute myeloid leukemia whereby its DNA binding domain fuses to different epigenetic regulators. To assess how different RUNX1 fusion proteins interact with the epigenome we compared the global binding patterns and the chromatin landscape of t(8;21) and t(3;21) AML which express RUNX1-ETO and RUNX1-EVI-1, respectively. We found that differential prognosis for these types of AML is reflected in fundamental differences in gene expression, chromatin landscape, binding patterns of the fusion proteins and other transcription factors as identified by genome-wide digital footprinting in patients. As previously shown for RUNX1-ETO, knockdown of RUNX1-EVI-1 expression initiates differentiation of t(3;21) cells which is associated with up-regulation of genes vital for myeloid differentiation, including C/EBPα. Furthermore, by expressing either dominant-negative C/EBP or an inducible C/EBPα construct in t(3;21) cells we show that C/EBPα is necessary and sufficient for the differentiation response of these cells to RUNX1-EVI-1 knockdown.
2017-06-26 | GSE87285 | GEO
Project description:RUNX1 is a frequent target of translocations in acute myeloid leukemia whereby its DNA binding domain fuses to different epigenetic regulators. To assess how different RUNX1 fusion proteins interact with the epigenome we compared the global binding patterns and the chromatin landscape of t(8;21) and t(3;21) AML which express RUNX1-ETO and RUNX1-EVI-1, respectively. We found that differential prognosis for these types of AML is reflected in fundamental differences in gene expression, chromatin landscape, binding patterns of the fusion proteins and other transcription factors as identified by genome-wide digital footprinting in patients. As previously shown for RUNX1-ETO, knockdown of RUNX1-EVI-1 expression initiates differentiation of t(3;21) cells which is associated with up-regulation of genes vital for myeloid differentiation, including C/EBPα. Furthermore, by expressing either dominant-negative C/EBP or an inducible C/EBPα construct in t(3;21) cells we show that C/EBPα is necessary and sufficient for the differentiation response of these cells to RUNX1-EVI-1 knockdown.
2017-06-26 | GSE87283 | GEO
Project description:RUNX1 is a frequent target of translocations in acute myeloid leukemia whereby its DNA binding domain fuses to different epigenetic regulators. To assess how different RUNX1 fusion proteins interact with the epigenome we compared the global binding patterns and the chromatin landscape of t(8;21) and t(3;21) AML which express RUNX1-ETO and RUNX1-EVI-1, respectively. We found that differential prognosis for these types of AML is reflected in fundamental differences in gene expression, chromatin landscape, binding patterns of the fusion proteins and other transcription factors as identified by genome-wide digital footprinting in patients. As previously shown for RUNX1-ETO, knockdown of RUNX1-EVI-1 expression initiates differentiation of t(3;21) cells which is associated with up-regulation of genes vital for myeloid differentiation, including C/EBPα. Furthermore, by expressing either dominant-negative C/EBP or an inducible C/EBPα construct in t(3;21) cells we show that C/EBPα is necessary and sufficient for the differentiation response of these cells to RUNX1-EVI-1 knockdown.
2017-06-26 | GSE87284 | GEO
Project description:The overall goal of this study is to identify the genomic binding of RUNX1 in MCF10A cells. We used ChIPseq (chromatin immunoprecipitation assay followed by deep sequencing) to identify the binding sites of RUNX1 in MCF10A cells. We performed ChIPseq of RUNX1 using parental MCF10A cells and did not identify high confident binding sites. To overcome this hurdle, we first generated a RUNX1 deleted MCF10A cell line using CRISPR-Cas9. We then transduced this RUNX1 KO MCF10A cells with lentiviruses that inducibly expresses RUNX1. After treating RUNX1 inducible MCF10A cells with 1 ug/ml doxycycline for 24 hours, we performed ChIPseq of RUNX1.
2019-04-18 | GSE129314 | GEO
Project description:The t(8;21) translocation fuses the DNA binding domain of the hematopoietic master regulator RUNX1 to the ETO protein. The resultant RUNX1/ETO fusion protein is a leukemia-initiating transcription factor that interferes with RUNX1 function. The result of this interference is a block in differentiation and, finally, the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To obtain insights into RUNX1/ETO-dependant alterations of the epigenetic landscape we measured genome-wide RUNX1- and RUNX1/ETO bound regions in t(8;21) cells and assessed to what extent the effects of RUNX1/ETO on the epigenome depend on its continued expression in established leukemic cells. To this end we determined dynamic alterations of histone acetylation, RNA Polymerase II binding and RUNX1 occupancy in the presence or absence of RUNX1/ETO using a knockdown approach. Combined global assessments of chromatin accessibility and kinetic gene expression data show that RUNX1/ETO controls the expression of important regulators of hematopoietic differentiation and self-renewal. We show that selective removal of RUNX1/ETO leads to a widespread reversal of epigenetic reprogramming and a genome-wide re-distribution of RUNX1 binding, resulting in the inhibition of leukemic proliferation and self-renewal and the induction of differentiation. This demonstrates that RUNX1/ETO represents a pivotal therapeutic target in AML. This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE29222: Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding [ChIP-Seq and DNAse-Hypersensitivity data] GSE29223: Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding [expression array data] GSE34540: Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding (ChIP-seq) GSE34594: Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding (Illumina expression) Refer to individual Series
2012-03-26 | E-GEOD-29225 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Aneuploidy and structural aberrations affecting chromosome 21 (Hsa21) are the most frequent in cytogentic events in acute myeloid leukemia. However, it remains unclear why leukemic blasts select for amplifications of Hsa21 or parts of it and why children with Down syndrome (i.e. trisomy 21) are at a high risk of developing leukemia. Here, we propose that disequilibrium of the RUNX1 isoforms and resultant RUNX1A dominance are key to trisomy 21-associated leukemogenesis. Using a Hsa21-focussed CRISPR-Cas9 screen, we uncovered a strong and specific RUNX1 dependency in myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome (ML-DS). High levels of RUNX1A – as seen in ML-DS – synergized with the pathognomonic Gata1s mutation in ML-DS pathogenesis, an effect that was reversed upon restoration of the normal RUNX1A:RUNX1C equilibrium. Mechanistically, RUNX1A displaces RUNX1C from its endogenous binding sites and recruits the MYC cofactor MAX to induce oncogenic programs and perturb normal differentiation. This presents a therapeutic vulnerability that can be exploited by interfering with MYC:MAX dimerization. Our study highlights the importance of alternative splicing in leukemogenesis, and paves the way for developing specific and targeted therapies for ML-DS as well as for other leukemias with Hsa21 aneuploidy or RUNX1 isoform disequilibrium.
2023-05-10 | PXD030616 | Pride
Project description:The t(8;21) translocation fuses the DNA binding domain of the hematopoietic master regulator RUNX1 to the ETO protein. The resultant RUNX1/ETO fusion protein is a leukemia-initiating transcription factor that interferes with RUNX1 function. The result of this interference is a block in differentiation and, finally, the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To obtain insights into RUNX1/ETO-dependant alterations of the epigenetic landscape we measured genome-wide RUNX1- and RUNX1/ETO bound regions in t(8;21) cells and assessed to what extent the effects of RUNX1/ETO on the epigenome depend on its continued expression in established leukemic cells. To this end we determined dynamic alterations of histone acetylation, RNA Polymerase II binding and RUNX1 occupancy in the presence or absence of RUNX1/ETO using a knockdown approach. Combined global assessments of chromatin accessibility and kinetic gene expression data show that RUNX1/ETO controls the expression of important regulators of hematopoietic differentiation and self-renewal. We show that selective removal of RUNX1/ETO leads to a widespread reversal of epigenetic reprogramming and a genome-wide re-distribution of RUNX1 binding, resulting in the inhibition of leukemic proliferation and self-renewal and the induction of differentiation. This demonstrates that RUNX1/ETO represents a pivotal therapeutic target in AML. Total RNA were obtained using 8 samples over four time courses (mismatch control and knock-down)
2012-03-27 | E-GEOD-29223 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The t(8;21) translocation fuses the DNA binding domain of the hematopoietic master regulator RUNX1 to the ETO protein. The resultant RUNX1/ETO fusion protein is a leukemia-initiating transcription factor that interferes with RUNX1 function. The result of this interference is a block in differentiation and, finally, the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To obtain insights into RUNX1/ETO-dependant alterations of the epigenetic landscape we measured genome-wide RUNX1- and RUNX1/ETO bound regions in t(8;21) cells and assessed to what extent the effects of RUNX1/ETO on the epigenome depend on its continued expression in established leukemic cells. To this end we determined dynamic alterations of histone acetylation, RNA Polymerase II binding and RUNX1 occupancy in the presence or absence of RUNX1/ETO using a knockdown approach. Combined global assessments of chromatin accessibility and kinetic gene expression data show that RUNX1/ETO controls the expression of important regulators of hematopoietic differentiation and self-renewal. We show that selective removal of RUNX1/ETO leads to a widespread reversal of epigenetic reprogramming and a genome-wide re-distribution of RUNX1 binding, resulting in the inhibition of leukemic proliferation and self-renewal and the induction of differentiation. This demonstrates that RUNX1/ETO represents a pivotal therapeutic target in AML. Total RNA were obtained using 8 samples over a time course of 10 days or using two samples two days after siRNA electroporation (mismatch control siRNA and RUNX1/ETO knock-down)
2012-03-27 | E-GEOD-34594 | biostudies-arrayexpress