Arginine methylation controls cell proliferation by integrating E2F activity with the splicing machinery (RIP-seq data set)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA438684 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6847870.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6847870_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6847870_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6847871.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6847871_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 15 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Arginine methylation controls cell proliferation by integrating E2F activity with the splicing machinery
| PRJNA438681 | ENA
Project description:Arginine methylation controls cell proliferation by integrating E2F activity with the splicing machinery (RNA-seq data set)
| PRJNA438683 | ENA
Project description:Residue-specific arginine methylation (meR) on the E2F1 subunit plays an essential role in determining whether cell cycle progression or apoptosis ensues, although the molecular pathways underpinning the effects of methylation remain obscure. We report here that the methylation events on E2F1 have a direct impact on the mechanisms which underpin gene expression control. Specifically, the PRMT5-mediated symR mark not only influences the transcription repertoire of genes targeted by E2F1, but also endows E2F1 with the ability to regulate RNA splicing. This occurs through tudor domain protein p100/TSN which reads the symR mark on E2F1, and thereby enables a distinct set of RNA to be alternatively spliced. The p100/TSN-E2F1 complex binds alternatively spliced RNAs, with many RNAs derived from E2F target genes connected with proliferation and cancer.
2019-07-02 | GSE111959 | GEO
Project description:Residue-specific arginine methylation (meR) on the E2F1 subunit plays an essential role in determining whether cell cycle progression or apoptosis ensues, although the molecular pathways underpinning the effects of methylation remain obscure. We report here that the methylation events on E2F1 have a direct impact on the mechanisms which underpin gene expression control. Specifically, the PRMT5-mediated symR mark not only influences the transcription repertoire of genes targeted by E2F1, but also endows E2F1 with the ability to regulate RNA splicing. This occurs through tudor domain protein p100/TSN which reads the symR mark on E2F1, and thereby enables a distinct set of RNA to be alternatively spliced. The p100/TSN-E2F1 complex binds alternatively spliced RNAs, with many RNAs derived from E2F target genes connected with proliferation and cancer.
2019-07-02 | GSE111960 | GEO
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2019-07-02 | GSE111961 | GEO
Project description:Recent genome-scale ChIP-chip studies of transcription factors have shown that a low percentage of experimentally determined binding sites contain the consensus motif for the immunoprecipitated factor. In most cases, differences between in vivo target sites that contain or lack a consensus motif have not been explored. We have previously shown that most sites to which E2F family members are bound in vivo do not contain E2F consensus motifs. The main purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of how E2F binding specificity is achieved in vivo. In particular, we have addressed how E2F family members are recruited to core promoter regions that lack a consensus motif and are excluded from other regions that contain a consensus motif. Using promoter and ENCODE arrays, we have shown that the predominant factors specifying whether E2F is recruited to an in vivo binding site are a) the site must be in a core promoter and b) the promoter region must be utilized as a promoter by the transcriptional machinery in that particular cell type. We have tested three models for recruitment of E2F to core promoters lacking a consensus site, including a) indirect recruitment, b) looping to the core promoter mediated by an E2F bound to a distal consensus motif, and c) assisted binding of E2F to a site that weakly resembles an E2F consensus motif within the core promoter. To test these models, we developed a new in vivo assay, termed eChIP, which allows analysis of transcription factor binding to isolated promoter fragments. Our findings suggest that in vivo a) the presence of a consensus motif is not sufficient to recruit E2Fs, b) E2Fs can bind to isolated regions that lack a consensus motif, and c) binding can require regions other than the best match to the E2F PWM in the core promoter. Keywords: E2F, ChIP-chip, transcription factor binding, consensus motifs 37 ChIP-chip arrays (of these, 14 array sets are biological duplicates). 22 samples are included in this series, the rest can be found in supplementary info to the following papers: Xu 2007, Jin 2006, Komashko 2008
2008-10-01 | E-GEOD-12126 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:E2F activity impacts on an extensive gene network mediated in part by PRMT5-dependent arginine methylation which widens its functional role in gene expression control. We show here that the PRMT5-E2F1 axis has an additional and unexpected level of control through facilitating expression of the non-coding genome where long non-coding (lnc) genes are direct targets for PRMT5 and E2F1. The expression of some lncRNAs results in their translation into small proteins, which then give rise to peptides which populate the MHC class I antigen presentation machinery. Pharmacological inhibition of PRMT5 alters the expression of lncRNA genes and thereby the repertoire lncRNA-derived peptides presented as MHC bound peptides. Delayed tumor growth upon PRMT5 inhibition reflects an influx of lncRNA peptide-specific cytotoxic CD8 T cells. When presented to the immune system as a stand-alone therapeutic vaccine, lncRNA-derived MHC-bound peptides are immunogenic and drive a potent anti-tumor T cell response with a significant delay in tumor growth. Our results show that the PRMT5 through its control of the E2F pathway influences expression of the non-coding genome and derived peptides presented to the immune system, which can subsequently be harnessed to deliver an effective stand-alone cancer vaccine. These results have important implications for deploying pharmacological intervention to manipulate gene expression and antigen presentation to the immune system and deploying new types of cancer vaccine. They also indicate that cell cycle control through the E2F pathway is intimately connected with immune recognition.
2023-01-26 | GSE181401 | GEO
Project description:Recent genome-scale ChIP-chip studies of transcription factors have shown that a low percentage of experimentally determined binding sites contain the consensus motif for the immunoprecipitated factor. In most cases, differences between in vivo target sites that contain or lack a consensus motif have not been explored. We have previously shown that most sites to which E2F family members are bound in vivo do not contain E2F consensus motifs. The main purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of how E2F binding specificity is achieved in vivo. In particular, we have addressed how E2F family members are recruited to core promoter regions that lack a consensus motif and are excluded from other regions that contain a consensus motif. Using promoter and ENCODE arrays, we have shown that the predominant factors specifying whether E2F is recruited to an in vivo binding site are a) the site must be in a core promoter and b) the promoter region must be utilized as a promoter by the transcriptional machinery in that particular cell type. We have tested three models for recruitment of E2F to core promoters lacking a consensus site, including a) indirect recruitment, b) looping to the core promoter mediated by an E2F bound to a distal consensus motif, and c) assisted binding of E2F to a site that weakly resembles an E2F consensus motif within the core promoter. To test these models, we developed a new in vivo assay, termed eChIP, which allows analysis of transcription factor binding to isolated promoter fragments. Our findings suggest that in vivo a) the presence of a consensus motif is not sufficient to recruit E2Fs, b) E2Fs can bind to isolated regions that lack a consensus motif, and c) binding can require regions other than the best match to the E2F PWM in the core promoter. Keywords: E2F, ChIP-chip, transcription factor binding, consensus motifs
2008-10-01 | GSE12126 | GEO
Project description:Mutations in cancer are due in part to DNA cytosine deamination by APOBEC3B (A3B). While low in healthy tissues, A3B expression and activity are elevated in tumors and further increase in metastases. However, molecular mechanisms responsible for A3B transcriptional regulation are poorly understood. Here, we address whether the RB/E2F pathway, which is often dysregulated in breast cancer, is a molecular trigger of A3B overexpression. First, an A3B promoter-driven luciferase reporter was used to demonstrate reporter activation by disruption of only one out of five predicted E2F binding sites. Second, A3B-luciferase reporter activation was also triggered by expressing the BK polyomavirus T-antigen, which inactivates RB and thereby alleviates repression of E2F regulated genes. Importantly, A3B-luciferase reporter induction by BK polyomavirus T-antigen could not be further increased by mutating the functional E2F binding site. Third, both CRISPR disruption and targeted base substitutions in the endogenous E2F binding site caused strong A3B upregulation and confirmed importance of this regulatory element. Fourth, proteomics experiments showed that members of the DREAM and PRC1.6-complexes including multiple E2F family members are able to bind to wild-type but not E2F mutant promoter sequences. Finally, a combination of genetic and biochemical studies implicated E2F4 and E2F6 in endogenous A3B gene repression. Altogether, our studies demonstrate that A3B expression is suppressed in normal cells by the RB/E2F axis and that viral or mutational disruption of this pathway causes overexpression of this DNA deaminase in cancer and contributes mutational fuel to tumor evolution.
2020-10-19 | PXD020473 | Pride
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE33033: ahrC mutant compared to D39 wild-type in Streptococcus pneumoniae in CDM + 10 mM arginine GSE33034: argR1 mutant compared to D39 wild-type in Streptococcus pneumoniae in CDM + 10 mM arginine GSE33035: argR1-ahrC mutant compared to D39 wild-type in Streptococcus pneumoniae in CDM + 10 mM arginine GSE33036: Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 wild-type grown in CDM+10 mM arginine compared to D39 wild type grown in CDM + 0.05 mM arginine Refer to individual Series
2011-11-02 | E-GEOD-33043 | biostudies-arrayexpress