Tissue-selective restriction of RNA editing of CaV1.3 by splicing factor SRSF9
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA450408 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR7010500_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7010500_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7010501_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7010501_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7010502_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 10 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Adenosine DeAminases acting on RNA (ADAR) catalyzes adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) conversion within RNA duplex structures. While A-to-I editing is often dynamically regulated in a spatial-temporal manner, the mechanisms underlying its tissue-selective restriction remain elusive. We have previously reported that transcripts of voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.3 are subject to brain-selective A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR2. Here, we show that editing of CaV1.3 mRNA is dependent on a 40 bp RNA duplex formed between exon 41 and an evolutionarily conserved editing site complementary sequence (ECS) located within the preceding intron. Heterologous expression of a mouse minigene that contained the ECS, intermediate intronic sequence and exon 41 with ADAR2 yielded robust editing. Interestingly, editing of CaV1.3 was potently inhibited by serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 9 (SRSF9). Mechanistically, the inhibitory effect of SRSF9 required direct RNA interaction. Selective down-regulation of SRSF9 in neurons provides a basis for the neuron-specific editing of CaV1.3 transcripts.
2018-04-17 | GSE113193 | GEO
Project description:Adenosine DeAminases acting on RNA (ADAR) catalyzes adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) conversion within RNA duplex structures. While A-to-I editing is often dynamically regulated in a spatial-temporal manner, the mechanisms underlying its tissue-selective restriction remain elusive. We have previously reported that transcripts of voltage-gated calcium channel CaV1.3 are subject to brain-selective A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR2. Here, we show that editing of CaV1.3 mRNA is dependent on a 40 bp RNA duplex formed between exon 41 and an evolutionarily conserved editing site complementary sequence (ECS) located within the preceding intron. Heterologous expression of a mouse minigene that contained the ECS, intermediate intronic sequence and exon 41 with ADAR2 yielded robust editing. Interestingly, editing of CaV1.3 was potently inhibited by serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 9 (SRSF9). Mechanistically, the inhibitory effect of SRSF9 required direct RNA interaction. Selective down-regulation of SRSF9 in neurons provides a basis for the neuron-specific editing of CaV1.3 transcripts.
| S-EPMC6101491 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Here, we show that the splicing factor SRSF9 selectively controls the editing of many brain-specific sites in mammals. SRSF9 is more lowly expressed in the mammalian brain than in non-brain tissues. Gene perturbation experiments and minigene analysis of candidate sites demonstrated that SRSF9 could robustly repress A-to-I editing by ADAR2. We found that SRSF9 biochemically interacted with ADAR2 in the nucleus via its RRM2 domain alone. Additionally, this interaction required the presence of the RNA substrate and disrupted the formation of ADAR2 dimers. Using transcriptome-wide location analysis and genome-wide RNA profiling, we identified 1,328 editing sites that are regulated directly by SRSF9. Importantly, we showed that this SRSF9 regulon is significantly enriched for brain-specific editing sites despite our unbiased approach. We further provide evidence that SRSF9 prevents cells from undergoing apoptosis possibly through the inhibition of ADAR2-mediated editing. Collectively, our results highlighted the importance of SRSF9 as an editing regulator and suggested that other splicing factors may also be involved in regulating RNA editing.
2018-06-21 | GSE108125 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: A-to-I RNA editing is critical for many cellular processes. The sites of A-I RNA editing can be identified through RNA-seq and matching the reads to the annotated database like RADAR. The goals of this study is to compare A-I RNA editing profile among wild type, ADAR2 overexpressing and ADAR2+SRSF9 overexpressing 293T cells to evaluate the influence of SRSF9 repressive action on A-I RNA editing Methods: A-I RNA editing profile and gene expression profiles were generated by deep sequencing from all the samples, using NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit. The sequence reads that passed quality filters were analyzed for identifying the A-I RNA editing sites using RADAR Database Results: Upon overexpression of ADAR2, we found that 18,174 sites were differentially edited compared to control cells, of which 97.0% showed a significant increase in their editing levels as expected (P < 0.05, Fisher’s test). Furthermore, when we overexpressed both ADAR2 and SRSF9 together, we found that 6,994 sites were differentially edited compared to overexpression of the deaminase alone (P < 0.05, Fisher’s test). Importantly, the editing of 92.5% of these sites was down-regulated, consistent with the function of SRSF9 as a repressor of editing. Conclusions: Our study reports a detailed analysis of the effect of SRSF9 on A-I RNA editing of ADAR2-specific targets. We Conclude that this SRSF9 regulon is significantly enriched for brain-specific editing sites despite our unbiased approach.
2018-06-21 | GSE114970 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: A-to-I RNA editing is critical for many cellular processes. The sites of A-I RNA editing can be identified through RNA-seq and matching the reads to the annotated database like RADAR. The goals of this study is to compare A-I RNA editing profile among wild type, ADAR2 overexpressing and ADAR2+SRSF9 overexpressing 293T cells to evaluate the influence of SRSF9 repressive action on A-I RNA editing Methods: A-I RNA editing profile and gene expression profiles were generated by deep sequencing from all the samples, using NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit. The sequence reads that passed quality filters were analyzed for identifying the A-I RNA editing sites using RADAR Database Results: Upon overexpression of ADAR2, we found that 18,174 sites were differentially edited compared to control cells, of which 97.0% showed a significant increase in their editing levels as expected (P < 0.05, Fisher’s test). Furthermore, when we overexpressed both ADAR2 and SRSF9 together, we found that 6,994 sites were differentially edited compared to overexpression of the deaminase alone (P < 0.05, Fisher’s test). Importantly, the editing of 92.5% of these sites was down-regulated, consistent with the function of SRSF9 as a repressor of editing. Conclusions: Our study reports a detailed analysis of the effect of SRSF9 on A-I RNA editing of ADAR2-specific targets. We Conclude that this SRSF9 regulon is significantly enriched for brain-specific editing sites despite our unbiased approach.
2018-06-21 | GSE108126 | GEO
Project description:Alternative splicing and mRNA editing are known to contribute to transcriptome diversity. Although alternative splicing is pervasive and known to contribute to a variety of pathologies, including cancer, the genetic context for individual differences in isoform usage is still evolving. Similarly, although mRNA editing is ubiquitous and associated with important biological processes such as intracellular viral replication and cancer development, individual variations in and the genetic transmissibility of mRNA editing are equivocal. Here, we have used linkage analysis to show that both mRNA editing and alternative splicing are regulated by the macrophage genetic background and environmental cues. We show that distinct loci, potentially harboring variable splice factors, regulate the splicing of multiple transcripts. Additionally, we show that individual genetic variability at the Apobec1 locus results in differential rates of C-to-U(T) editing in murine macrophages; with mouse strains expressing mostly a truncated isoform of Apobec1 exhibiting lower rates of editing. As a proof of concept, we have used linkage analysis to identify 36 high confidence novel edited sites. These results provide a novel and complementary method that can be used to identify C-to-U editing sites in individuals segregating at specific loci and show that, beyond individual DNA sequence and structural changes, differential isoform usage and mRNA editing can contribute to intra-species genomic and phenotypic diversity. Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) from female AxB/BxA mice were left unstimulated or stimulated with IFNG/TNF, or CpG for 18 hrs or infected with infected with type II (Pru A7) for 8 hrs. The transcriptional response was then measured using the illumina RNA-seq protocol on an illumuna HiSeq 2000.
2013-11-13 | E-GEOD-47540 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In eukaryotes, nascent RNA transcripts undergo an intricate series of RNA processing steps to achieve mRNA maturation. RNA editing and alternative splicing are two major RNA processing steps that can introduce significant modifications to the final gene products. By tackling these processes in isolation, recent studies have enabled substantial progress in understanding their global RNA targets and regulatory pathways. However, the interplay between individual steps of RNA processing, an essential aspect of gene regulation, remains poorly understood. By sequencing the RNA of different subcellular fractions, we examined the timing of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing and its impact on alternative splicing. We observed that > 90% A-to-I RNA editing events occurred in the chromatin-associated RNA prior to polyadenylation. We report about 500 editing sites in the 3’ acceptor sequences that can alter splicing of the associated exons. Interestingly, these exons are highly conserved during evolution and reside in genes with important cellular function. Furthermore, we identified a second class of exons whose splicing is likely modulated by RNA secondary structures that are recognized by the RNA editing machinery. The genome-wide analyses, supported by experimental validations, revealed remarkable interplay between RNA editing and splicing and expanded the repertoire of functional RNA editing sites.
2018-04-25 | GSE105773 | GEO
Project description:In this study, we profiled the placental proteome of IUGR twins and normal cotwins from 6 monochorionic twin pairs with selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR).
2022-07-15 | PXD035369 |
Project description:Alternative splicing and mRNA editing are known to contribute to transcriptome diversity. Although alternative splicing is pervasive and known to contribute to a variety of pathologies, including cancer, the genetic context for individual differences in isoform usage is still evolving. Similarly, although mRNA editing is ubiquitous and associated with important biological processes such as intracellular viral replication and cancer development, individual variations in and the genetic transmissibility of mRNA editing are equivocal. Here, we have used linkage analysis to show that both mRNA editing and alternative splicing are regulated by the macrophage genetic background and environmental cues. We show that distinct loci, potentially harboring variable splice factors, regulate the splicing of multiple transcripts. Additionally, we show that individual genetic variability at the Apobec1 locus results in differential rates of C-to-U(T) editing in murine macrophages; with mouse strains expressing mostly a truncated isoform of Apobec1 exhibiting lower rates of editing. As a proof of concept, we have used linkage analysis to identify 36 high confidence novel edited sites. These results provide a novel and complementary method that can be used to identify C-to-U editing sites in individuals segregating at specific loci and show that, beyond individual DNA sequence and structural changes, differential isoform usage and mRNA editing can contribute to intra-species genomic and phenotypic diversity.
2013-11-13 | GSE47540 | GEO
Project description:Label the cells overexpressed Flag tagged YTHDC1, SRSF1, SRSF3, SRSF7, SRSF9 and SRSF10 with 4-SU, the RNA bound by YTHDC1 and SRSF proteins can be got by Flag IP followed by RNA isolation by using the TRIzol (Invitrogen) reagent by following the company manual.the RNA was then used for library preparation using a TruSeq⢠RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturerâs protocol.The libraries were sequenced using HiSeq2000 (Illumina) in single-read mode, creating reads with a length of 101 bp. Sequencing chemistry v2 (Illumina) was used and samples were multiplexed in two samples per lane. Discovery of the binding motif of YTHDC1, SRSF1, SRSF3, SRSF7, SRSF9 or SRSF10 in overexpressed Human HeLa cells
2016-02-17 | E-GEOD-71096 | biostudies-arrayexpress