Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA477536 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR7412820.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7412821.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7412822.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7412823.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7412824.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:To evaluate the differential impact of IFN-gamma secretion on nasal cavity epithelial cells, we compared the transcriptional profiles of nasal cavity epithelial cells (CD45-, CD3- CD11b-, CD31-, CD326+) from wildtype and IFN-gamma knockout mice at 30 days (d30) post intranasal infection with a live attenuated influenza virus expressing the immunodominant H-2Kd CD8 T cell epitope from Sendai virus nucleoprotein (LAIV-SenNP). Nasal cavity epithelial cells were also analyzed from LAIV-SenNP immunized wildtype and IFN-gamma knockout mice 3 days after intranasal administration of Sendai virus nucleoprotein peptide (d30+3). The results indicate that nasal cavity epithelial cells express genes associated with antigen presentation and antiviral function following antigen-specific T cell activation, and these alterations in transcriptional programming depend on IFN-gamma secretion.
2024-02-15 | GSE247376 | GEO
Project description:Influenza A virus encodes promoters in both the sense and antisense orientations. These support the generation of new genomes, antigenomes, and mRNA transcripts. Characterization of the influenza promoters using minimal replication assays—transfections with viral polymerase, nucleoprotein, and a genomic template—defined their sequence as 13nt at the 5’ end of the viral genomic RNA (U13) and 12nt at the 3’ end (U12).Other than a single position the U12 and U13 sequences are identical between all eight RNA molecules that comprise the segmented influenza genome.Nevertheless, each segment can exhibit different transcriptional dynamics despite possessing identical promoters.Minimal replication assays lack the influenza protein NS2, which can modulate transcription and replication differentially between influenza segments.This suggests that NS2 expression may redefine the influenza A virus promoter.In this work we assess how internal regions of sequence in two genomic segments, HA and PB1, may contribute to NS2-dependent replication as well as map such interactions down to individual nucleotides in PB1. We find that the expression of NS2 significantly alters sequence requirements for efficient replication beyond the identical U12 and U13 sequence, providing a mechanism for the divergent replication and transcription dynamics across the influenza A virus genome.
2024-09-10 | GSE276697 | GEO
Project description:GC-like structures within iBALT serve as a distinct niche that independently support the maturation and selection of B cells primarily targeted against the influenza virus nucleoprotein. Our findings suggest that iBALT, which are positioned at the frontline of the lung mucosa, drive long-lived and unique GC reactions that contribute to the diversity of the humoral response targeting influenza.
2019-03-14 | GSE124369 | GEO
Project description:Recent avian and swine-origin influenza virus outbreaks illustrate the ongoing threat of influenza pandemic. New vaccines that offer accelerated production and broader, more universal protection against drifted and shifted strains are needed. Here, we investigated a multivalent PMED DNA vaccine for the ability to induce antibody and T cell responses against four HA antigens, nucleoprotein and the ectodomain of M2 (M2e).
2016-07-31 | GSE77824 | GEO
Project description:Virus-host interactions are complicated processes, and multiple cellular proteins have been reported to promote or inhibit viral replication through different mechanisms. Recent progress has implicated circular RNAs (circRNA) in cancer biology and progression; however, the role of circRNAs in viral infection remains largely unclear. Here, we detected 11,620 circRNAs in A549 cells and found that 411 of them were differentially expressed in influenza virus-infected A549 cells. We characterized a novel intronic circRNA, AIVR, that was upregulated in influenza virus-infected A549 cells, and found that silencing of AIVR significantly promoted influenza virus replication in A549 cells. We further found that AIVR predominantly localizes in the cytoplasm and works as a microRNA (miRNA) sponge. One of the miRNAs absorbed by AIVR binds the mRNA of CREBBP, which is an important component of the large nucleoprotein complex IFN-β enhanceosome that accelerates IFN-β production. AIVR-overexpression significantly increased the mRNA and protein levels of INF-β in the influenza virus-infected A549 cells. Therefore, the upregulation of AIVR is a cellular antiviral strategy, with AIVR exerting its antiviral effect by absorbing miRNA and promoting the expression of CREBBP to facilitate IFN-β production. Our study provides new insights into the roles of circRNAs in the cellular innate antiviral response.
2021-07-06 | GSE172315 | GEO
Project description:Alternative Interaction Sites in the Influenza A Virus Nucleoprotein
| PRJEB32637 | ENA
Project description:In recent years, the roles of microRNAs playing in the regulation of influenza viruses replication caused researchers' much attenion. However, much work focused on the interactions between human, mice or chicken microRNAs with human or avian influenza viruses rather than the interactions of swine microRNAs and swine influenza viruses. To investigate the roles of swine microRNAs playing in the regulation of swine influenza A virus replication, the microRNA microarray was performed to identify which swine microRNAs were involved in swine H1N1/2009 influenza A virus infection.
2017-03-24 | GSE96953 | GEO
Project description:Heldt2012 - Influenza Virus Replication
The model describes the life cycle of influenza A virus in a mammalian cell including the following steps: attachment of parental virions to the cell membrane, receptor-mediated endocytosis, fusion of the virus envelope with the endosomal membrane, nuclear import of vRNPs, viral transcription and replication, translation of the structural viral proteins, nuclear export of progeny vRNPs and budding of new virions. It also explicitly accounts for the stabilization of cRNA by viral polymerases and NP and the inhibition of vRNP activity by M1 protein binding. In short, the model focuses on the molecular mechanism that controls viral transcription and replication.
This model is described in the article:
Modeling the intracellular dynamics of influenza virus replication to understand the control of viral RNA synthesis.
Heldt FS, Frensing T, Reichl U.
J Virol.
Abstract:
Influenza viruses transcribe and replicate their negative-sense RNA genome inside the nucleus of host cells via three viral RNA species. In the course of an infection, these RNAs show distinct dynamics, suggesting that differential regulation takes place. To investigate this regulation in a systematic way, we developed a mathematical model of influenza virus infection at the level of a single mammalian cell. It accounts for key steps of the viral life cycle, from virus entry to progeny virion release, while focusing in particular on the molecular mechanisms that control viral transcription and replication. We therefore explicitly consider the nuclear export of viral genome copies (vRNPs) and a recent hypothesis proposing that replicative intermediates (cRNA) are stabilized by the viral polymerase complex and the nucleoprotein (NP). Together, both mechanisms allow the model to capture a variety of published data sets at an unprecedented level of detail. Our findings provide theoretical support for an early regulation of replication by cRNA stabilization. However, they also suggest that the matrix protein 1 (M1) controls viral RNA levels in the late phase of infection as part of its role during the nuclear export of viral genome copies. Moreover, simulations show an accumulation of viral proteins and RNA toward the end of infection, indicating that transport processes or budding limits virion release. Thus, our mathematical model provides an ideal platform for a systematic and quantitative evaluation of influenza virus replication and its complex regulation.
With the current parameter set, the model reproduces an infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. Figure 2A of the paper is reproduced here, with parameters kDegRnp and kSynP changed to zeros.
Initial conditions and parameter changes that were used to obtain specific figures in the article can be found in Table A2.
The model has the correct value for kAttLo as 4.55e-04. The value of this parameter mentioned as 4.55e-02 in Table 1 of the paper is incorrect. This is checked with the author.
This model is hosted on BioModels Database
and identified
by: MODEL1307270000
.
To cite BioModels Database, please use: BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource
for published quantitative kinetic models
.
To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or
neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to the public
domain worldwide. Please refer to CC0 Public Domain
Dedication
for more information.
2024-09-02 | BIOMD0000000463 | BioModels
Project description:Interactions between influenza A virus nucleoprotein and gene segment UTRs facilitate selective modulation of viral gene expression.
| PRJNA803173 | ENA
Project description:Recent avian and swine-origin influenza virus outbreaks illustrate the ongoing threat of influenza pandemic. New vaccines that offer accelerated production and broader, more universal protection against drifted and shifted strains are needed. Here, we investigated a multivalent PMED DNA vaccine for the ability to induce antibody and T cell responses against four HA antigens, nucleoprotein and the ectodomain of M2 (M2e). Macaques in the Vaccinated and Control groups were intramuscularly anaesthetized with ketamine (10 mg/kg) and inoculated with a suspension containing 10^6.5 p.f.u. ml-1 of CA09 virus through a combination of intratracheal (4.5 ml), intranasal (0.5 ml per nostril), ocular (0.1 ml per eye) and oral (1 ml) routes (resulting in a total infectious dose of 10^7.4 PFU). Bronchoalveolar lavages were collected two weeks prior to challenge and at days 3, 7, and 10 post-infection. We performed microarray analysis on these samples.
2016-07-31 | E-GEOD-77824 | biostudies-arrayexpress