Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: A comparison of two DNA extraction methods on soil and stool samples.

PROVIDER: PRJNA482847 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR13607944.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR13607945.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR13607946.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR13607947.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR13607948.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 34

Similar Datasets

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction protocols from stool samples

| PRJNA648321 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification methods for Plant-Associated Samples

| PRJNA646931 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:soil samples - DNA extraction

| PRJNA354227 | ENA

human gut metagenome

Project description:Comparison of microbial DNA extraction methods for clinical applications

| PRJDB7617 | ENA

Homo sapiens

Project description:Comparison of extraction methods on ancient samples from tropical environments

| PRJNA398385 | ENA

Yeast Genomic Expression Patterns in Response to Zymolyase Treatment

Project description:We used microarray to investigate the influence of zymolyase treatment which is used for degradation of yeast cell wall. Two types of RNA extraction methods were used, and zymolyase preprocessing was applied to one among them. The qualities of total RNA extracted by two extraction methods were checked, and then RNAs were used for generating cloned DNA and RNA. Finally, two types of cRNA were hybridized to Affymetrix yeast genome 2.0_array. Keywords: comparison of RNA extraction process

2010-03-31 | GSE18456 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction methods for long-read mNGS testing

| PRJNA824617 | ENA

Evaluating the protein extraction methods for gut metaproteomics

Project description:Human stool samples were collected, microbial cells were harvested and subjected to protein extraction using different protocols for metaproteomics analyses. The protein extraction methods differ from the usage of different lysis buffer (SDS, urea and commercially available B-Per reagent), bead beating, ultrasonication and heating. The impacts of different protein extraction methods on metaproteomics results were evaluated with multiple criteria including protein yields, peptide identifications, taxonomic compositions and functional compositions.

2017-07-17 | PXD005969 | Pride

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling

| PRJEB20983 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of extraction methods for recovering ancient microbial DNA from paleofeces

| PRJEB33577 | ENA