Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Feedforward regulation of Myc coordinates lineage-specific with housekeeping gene expression during progenitor cell differentiation

ABSTRACT: Feedforward regulation of Myc coordinates lineage-specific with housekeeping gene expression during progenitor cell differentiation

PROVIDER: PRJNA516584 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR8476560.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR8476570.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR8476580.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR8476590.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR8476551.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 40

Similar Datasets

Feedforward regulation of Myc coordinates lineage-specific with housekeeping gene expression during progenitor cell differentiation

Project description:Chromatin-associated RNA-Seq of pre-B cell line B3 transduced with Ikaros (Ikaros-ERt2) or Myc (Myc-ERt2) or Ikaros+Myc or control vector (Empty).

2019-03-01 | GSE125493 | GEO

Feedforward regulation of Myc coordinates lineage-specific with housekeeping gene expression during B cell progenitor cell differentiation.

Project description:The differentiation of self-renewing progenitor cells requires not only the regulation of lineage- and developmental stage-specific genes but also the coordinated adaptation of housekeeping functions from a metabolically active, proliferative state toward quiescence. How metabolic and cell-cycle states are coordinated with the regulation of cell type-specific genes is an important question, because dissociation between differentiation, cell cycle, and metabolic states is a hallmark of cancer. Here, we use a model system to systematically identify key transcriptional regulators of Ikaros-dependent B cell-progenitor differentiation. We find that the coordinated regulation of housekeeping functions and tissue-specific gene expression requires a feedforward circuit whereby Ikaros down-regulates the expression of Myc. Our findings show how coordination between differentiation and housekeeping states can be achieved by interconnected regulators. Similar principles likely coordinate differentiation and housekeeping functions during progenitor cell differentiation in other cell lineages.

| S-EPMC6481923 | biostudies-literature

WSB1 regulates c-Myc expression through β-Catenin signalling and forms a feedforward circuit.

Project description:The dysregulation of transcription factors is widely associated with tumourigenesis. As the most well-defined transcription factor in multiple types of cancer, c-Myc can transform cells by transactivating various downstream genes. Given that there is no effective way to directly inhibit c-Myc, c-Myc targeting strategies hold great potential for cancer therapy. In this study, we found that WSB1, which has a highly positive correlation with c-Myc in 10 cancer cell lines and clinical samples, is a direct target gene of c-Myc, and can positively regulate c-Myc expression, which forms a feedforward circuit promoting cancer development. RNA sequencing results from Bel-7402 cells confirmed that WSB1 promoted c-Myc expression through the β-Catenin pathway. Mechanistically, WSB1 affected β-Catenin destruction complex-PPP2CA assembly and E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor β-TRCP recruitment, which inhibited the ubiquitination of β-Catenin and transactivated c-Myc. Of interest, the effect of WSB1 on c-Myc was independent of its E3 ligase activity. Moreover, overexpressing WSB1 in the Bel-7402 xenograft model could further strengthen the tumour-driven effect of c-Myc overexpression. Thus, our findings revealed a novel mechanism involved in tumourigenesis in which the WSB1/c-Myc feedforward circuit played an essential role, highlighting a potential c-Myc intervention strategy in cancer treatment.

2021-10-01 | GSE182635 | GEO

WSB1 regulates c-Myc expression through β-Catenin signalling and forms a feedforward circuit.

Project description:WSB1 regulates c-Myc expression through β-Catenin signalling and forms a feedforward circuit.

| PRJNA757243 | ENA

Oncogenic MYC Activates a Feedforward Regulatory Loop Promoting Essential Amino Acid Metabolism and Tumorigenesis

Project description:Oncogenic MYC Activates a Feedforward Regulatory Loop Promoting Essential Amino Acid Metabolism and Tumorigenesis

| PRJNA418288 | ENA

USP29 coordinates MYC and HIF1α stabilization to promote tumor metabolism and progression

Project description:USP29 coordinates MYC and HIF1α stabilization to promote tumor metabolism and progression

| PRJNA749584 | ENA

Oncogenic MYC Activates a Feedforward Regulatory Loop Promoting Essential Amino Acid Metabolism and Tumorigenesis

Project description:Oncogenic MYC selectively activates Slc7a5 and Slc43a1 transcription and thus promotes essential amino acids (EAAs) uptake in Daudi cells. Elevated EAAs in turn stimulate Myc mRNA translation, prompting us to investigate whether Slc7a5/Slc43a1 inhibition affects MYC-dependent transcription. We performed microarrays to profile global gene expression and to identify Slc7a5-regulated genes.

2019-11-11 | GSE106869 | GEO

Enhancer-core promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping regulation

Project description:Gene transcription in animals involves the assembly of the RNA polymerase II complex at core promoters and its cell type-specific activation by genomic enhancers that can be located more distally. However, how ubiquitous expression of housekeeping genes is achieved has remained less clear. In particular, it is unknown whether ubiquitously active enhancers exist and how developmental and housekeeping gene regulation is separated. An attractive hypothesis is that different types of core promoters might exhibit an intrinsic specificity towards certain types of enhancers. Here, we show that thousands of enhancers in D. melanogaster S2 cells and ovarian somatic cells (OSCs) exhibit a marked specificity towards one of two core promoters M-bM-^@M-^S one derived from a ubiquitously expressed ribosomal protein gene and another from a developmentally regulated transcription factor. Enhancers that activate the housekeeping core promoter are functional across the two different cell types, while developmental enhancers exhibit strong cell type specificity. Both enhancer classes differ in their overall genomic distribution, the functions of neighbouring genes,these genesM-bM-^@M-^Y core promoter elements, as well as the associated factors. Our results provide evidence for a sequence-encoded enhancer-core promoter specificity that separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulatory programs for thousands of enhancers and their target genes across the entire genome. STARR-seq was performed in S2 and OSC cells using two core promoters each representing housekeeping and developmental transcription programs. Data for housekeeping promoters (hkCP) are presented in this series; Data for developmental core promoters (dCP) samples are presented in GSE40739.

2014-12-10 | E-GEOD-57876 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Tsc2 coordinates differentiation

Project description:Tsc2 coordinates differentiation

| PRJNA953947 | ENA

Enhancer-core promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping regulation

Project description:Gene transcription in animals involves the assembly of the RNA polymerase II complex at core promoters and its cell type-specific activation by genomic enhancers that can be located more distally. However, how ubiquitous expression of housekeeping genes is achieved has remained less clear. In particular, it is unknown whether ubiquitously active enhancers exist and how developmental and housekeeping gene regulation is separated. An attractive hypothesis is that different types of core promoters might exhibit an intrinsic specificity towards certain types of enhancers. Here, we show that thousands of enhancers in D. melanogaster S2 cells and ovarian somatic cells (OSCs) exhibit a marked specificity towards one of two core promoters – one derived from a ubiquitously expressed ribosomal protein gene and another from a developmentally regulated transcription factor. Enhancers that activate the housekeeping core promoter are functional across the two different cell types, while developmental enhancers exhibit strong cell type specificity. Both enhancer classes differ in their overall genomic distribution, the functions of neighbouring genes,these genes’ core promoter elements, as well as the associated factors. Our results provide evidence for a sequence-encoded enhancer-core promoter specificity that separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulatory programs for thousands of enhancers and their target genes across the entire genome.

2014-12-10 | GSE57876 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data