Project description:Gene expression profiles of two Pseudomonas aeruginosa taxonomic outlier clinical isolates, CLJ1 and CLJ3 [CLJ1] Pseudomonas aeruginosa taxonomic outliers emerged recently as infectious for humans, provoking hemorrhagic pneumonia. Those bacteria lack classical type III secretion system, and utilize the pore-forming toxin for infection. Two clones CLJ1 and CLJ3 belonging to these taxonomic outliers have been isolated from the same patient at two different times during hospitalization. P. aeruginosa CLJ3 displays antibiotic resistance phenotype, while CLJ1 is more cytotoxic on epithelial and endothelial cells.
Project description:Gene expression profiles of two Pseudomonas aeruginosa taxonomic outlier clinical isolates, CLJ1 and CLJ3 [CLJ3] Pseudomonas aeruginosa taxonomic outliers emerged recently as infectious for humans, provoking hemorrhagic pneumonia. Those bacteria lack classical type III secretion system, and utilize the pore-forming toxin for infection. Two clones CLJ1 and CLJ3 belonging to these taxonomic outliers have been isolated from the same patient at two different times during hospitalization. P. aeruginosa CLJ3 displays antibiotic resistance phenotype, while CLJ1 is more cytotoxic on epithelial and endothelial cells.
Project description:Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) lung infection is a significant cause of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Most CF patients acquire unique P. aeruginosa strains from the environment; however clonal strains have been identified in CF communities in several countries. Two clonal strains infect 10% to 40% of patients in three CF clinics in mainland eastern Australia. The expression profiles of four planktonically-grown isolates of one Australian clonal strain (AES-2), and four non–clonal CF P. aeruginosa isolates were compared to each other and to the reference strain PAO1 using the Affymetrix P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome array, to gain insight into properties mediating the enhanced infectivity of AES-1. The isolates were subsequently grown as 3-day old biofilms and similarly extracted for RNA and compared as above. Data analysis was carried out using BIOCONDUCTOR software. Keywords: Comparative strain hybridization