Project description:3D cultivation of cells lead to changes in morphology of the cells. This is likely to explain the higher radioresistance of cells growing in 3D compared to cells growing in 2D cell culture. Whole genome gene expression is performed to determine genes involved in changes of cell moroholgy and radioresistance. Keywords: comparison of 2D vs. 3D cell culture
Project description:3D cultivation of cells lead to changes in morphology of the cells. This is likely to explain the higher radioresistance of cells growing in 3D compared to cells growing in 2D cell culture. Whole genome gene expression is performed to determine genes involved in changes of cell moroholgy and radioresistance. Keywords: comparison of 2D vs. 3D cell culture RNA of cells was isolated four days after growing in the two different cell culture systems
Project description:* To compare surgical and oncological outcomes in patients underwent to colorectal resection with 3D vs 2D laparoscopic technique.
* To evaluate the visual overload in surgeons using 3D laparoscopic technique.
Project description:To investigate the differential transcriptomics upon DMT1 in 2D vs 3D cell culture in breast cancer cells Gene expression analysis from MDA-MB-231 RNA-seq data of WT and DMT1 KO cells both in 2D and 3D cell culture conditions
Project description:To study the impact of the organotypic assembly of vascular smooth muscle cells on their transcriptome, we cultured human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells under 2D conditions and as aggregates in hanging drops under 3D conditions. After 48 hours, RNA was isolated from both groups
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of the Fischer Rat Thyroid (FRT) cells comparing polarizing cells grown as a confluent two-dimensional monolayer (2D culture system) with cells grown in matrigel where they acquire a three-dimensional follicular structure (3D culture system).The goal was to identify regulators of 3D epithelial thyroid polarization and follicle formation.
Project description:In these microarray experiments, we characterize the gene expression of mammary epithelial cells (MCF10A cells) grown in either a traditional monolayer cell culture setting (2D) or on Matrigel, which induces single MCF10A cells to form organized acinar structures (3D). Morphogenesis of mammary epithelial cells into organized acinar structures in vitro is accompanied by widespread changes in gene expression patterns, including a substantial decrease in expression of Myc. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of morphogenesis and organization on gene expression with respect to changes in overall gene expression and Myc target gene expression. MCF10A cells were cultured in 2D for either 2 or 5 days (3 biological replicates each) or in 3D for 8 or 16 days (3 or 5 biological replicates, respectively)
Project description:Analysis of 2D (transwell) and 3D (collagen type I) cultured MDCK cells and HGF (a MAPK activator). Traditional 2D cultures are fast and inexpensive but do no mimic natural niche/cell environment as well as the more laborious and costly 3D-cultures. 3D cultures, arguably, are better models for the study of developmental processes, such as tubulogenesis. Epithelial organs (such as kidney) develop via tubulogenesis, a process, at least in part, regulated by MAPK signaling. Therefore, 2D and 3D cells also treated with HGF plus MAPK inhibitors. Results provide insights into differential response to HGF-induced tubulogenesis depending on cell culture conditions (2D vs. 3D). 29 samples total: 2D and 3D control (untreated) in quadruplicate, respectively; 2D and 3D + HGF in quadruplicate, respectively; 2D + HGF + PD-98059 in quadruplicate; 3D + HGF + PD-98059 in triplicate; 2D + HGF + U0126 in triplicate; and 3D + HGF + U0126 in triplicate.
Project description:Purpose: the goal of this study is to detect and compare the transcriptome expression of mouse macrophages cultured in 3D and 2D environments, and find the effect of 3D culture on macrophages compared with traditional 2D culture. Methods: Total RNA was extracted from purified and untreated RAW264.7 cells from 3D and 2D culture systems using TRIzol. The RNA samples were analyzed using Whole Genome Oligo Microarrays. After RNA had been hybridized to the microarray, it was washed and scanned, and data were extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction Software. Gene expression data were generated using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 on an Affymetrix 3000 instrument running Gene‑Chip operating software. Result: RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed that after 24 h of culture under the same conditions, 3D-cultured macrophages showed significant differences in gene expression. RNA-seq detected 18580 genes in the 2D group and 15777 genes in the 3D group, among which 6762 were differentially expressed (|log2(fold change)| >= 1, padj < 0.05) in both 3D and 2D groups. A total of 5949 genes were downregulated and 813 were upregulated. Conclusion: Our study represents the first detailed analysis of the effect of 3D culture on mouse macrophages, and the results showed that compared with traditional 2D culture, the gene expression of macrophages under 3D culture was significantly changed.These findings are therefore worthy of further investigation and verification, and provide novel avenues for future research in cytology and macrophages.