Project description:We employed dermal fibroblasts isolated from Fgfr3G374Rneo+ mice, which do not express functional Fgfr3 (Fgfr3KO), from Fgfr3G374Rneo- mice with ligand-independent constitutive activation of Fgfr3 (Fgfr3Act) and from wildtype (WT) mice with normal expression of Fgfr3. Total RNA from these murine dermal fibroblasts (passage 4) were extracted and after quality control, were hybridized to the murine genome U74 gene chip. We have identified that Fgfr3 regulates important profibrotic pathways in fibroblasts. Selective upregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and its ligand FGF9 promote fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis Transcriptome profiling, in silico analysis and functional experiments revealed that FGFR3 synergistically induces multiple profibrotic pathways including Endothelin-, Interleukin-4- and CTGF-signaling in a CREB-dependent manner. Inhibition of FGFR3 signaling by fibroblast-specific knockout of FGFR3 or FGF9 or pharmacological inhibition of FGFR3 inhibited fibroblast activation and attenuated experimental skin fibrosis. We have characterized FGFR3 as an upstream regulator of a network of profibrotic mediators and as a potential target for the treatment of fibrosis.
Project description:We provide an original multi-stage approach identifying a gene signature to assess the fibroblast polarization. Prototypic polarizations (inflammatory/fibrotic) were induced by seeded mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with TNFα or TGFß1, respectively. The transcriptomic and proteomic profiles were obtained by RNA microarray and LC/MS-MS. Gene Ontology and pathways analysis were performed among the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and proteins (DEPs). Balb/c mice underwent daily intradermal injections of HOCl (or PBS) as an experimental murine model of inflammation-mediated fibrosis in a time-dependent manner. As results, 1,456 and 2,215 DEGs, and 289 and 233 DEPs were respectively found in MEFs in response to TNFα or TGFß1, respectively. Among the most significant pathways, we combined 26 representative genes to encompass the proinflammatory and profibrotic polarizations of fibroblasts. Based on principal component analysis, this signature deciphered baseline state, proinflammatory polarization, and profibrotic polarization as accurately as did RNA microarray and LC/MS-MS. Then, we assessed the gene signature on dermal fibroblasts isolated from the experimental murine model. We observed a proinflammatory polarization at day 7, and a mixture of a proinflammatory and profibrotic polarizations at day 42 in line with histological findings. Our approach provides a small-size and convenient gene signature to assess murine fibroblast polarization.
Project description:To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying altered-FGFR3 oncogenic activity in bladder carcinomas, we made use of UMUC-14 cell lines, which endogenously expressed a mutated activated form of FGFR3 (FGFR3-S249C), the growth and transformation of these cell lines being dependent on activated-FGFR3 activity. We conducted a gene expression analysis using Affymetrix DNA arrays in this cell line treated or not with FGFR3 siRNAs.
Project description:To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying altered-FGFR3 oncogenic activity in bladder carcinomas, we made use of MGH-U3 cell lines, which were derived from a human bladder tumor and endogenously expressed a mutated activated form of FGFR3 (FGFR3-Y375C), the growth and transformation of these cell lines being dependent on activated-FGFR3 activity. We conducted a gene expression analysis using Affymetrix DNA arrays in this cell line treated or not with FGFR3 siRNAs.
Project description:To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying altered-FGFR3 oncogenic activity in bladder carcinomas, we made use of RT112 cell lines, which were derived from a human bladder tumor and endogenously expressed the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion protein, the growth and transformation of these cell lines being dependent on activated-FGFR3 activity. We conducted a gene expression analysis using Affymetrix DNA arrays in this cell line treated or not with FGFR3 siRNAs.
Project description:Fibrosis due to extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion from myofibroblasts complicates many chronic liver diseases causing scarring and organ failure. Integrin-dependent interaction with scar ECM promotes profibrotic features. This microarray study was performed to clarify the role of integrin beta-1 (Itgb1) in profibrotic myofibroblasts.
Project description:In order to interrogate the transcriptional changes elicited by FGFR3-TACC3, we expressed the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion protein in human astrocytes and compared the global gene expression profiles of cells treated with a specific inhibitor of FGFR3-TK (PD173074) or vehicle. FGFR3-TACC3 expressing HA were also compared with HA that expressed the kinase-inactive FGFR3-TACC3 (FGFR3-TACC3-K508M) and HA transduced with the empty vector. Gene Ontology-guided enrichment map demonstrated that, besides the expected enrichment for mitotic activity, oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial biogenesis were the most significant biological functions enriched in HA expressing active FGFR3-TACC3.
Project description:Aberrant activation of FGFR3 via overexpression or mutation is a frequent feature of bladder cancer; however, its molecular and cellular consequences and functional relevance to carcinogenesis are not well understood. In this study with a bladder carcinoma cell line expressing inducible FGFR3 shRNAs, we sought to identiy transcriptional targets of FGFR3 and investigate their contribution to bladder cancer development. Bladder cancer cell line RT112 was transduced with a doxycycline-inducible control EGFP shRNA or three independent FGFR3 shRNAs, designated FGFR3 shRNA 2-4, FGFR3 shRNA 4-1 and FGFR3 shRNA 6-16. These four cell lines were treated with or without doxycycline for 48 hr to deplete FGFR3 protein prior to the isolation of mRNA for microarray analysis. Genes that were differentially expressed after doxycycline induction in all three FGFR3-depleted cell lines but not in the control cell line were considered potential FGFR3-regulated genes. Each treatment group was run in triplcates, and there are 24 samples.