Cell cycle-dependent chromatin and transcriptional changes
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA705689 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR13816100_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13816100_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13816101_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13816101_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13816102_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 88 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The cellular and nuclear states are constantly changing and closely linked to DNA replication and cell division, defining cell cycle phases. Pharmacological inhibition is a widely used strategy to enrich for specific phases to study them in isolation. However, it is important to understand how synchronization influences chromatin openness and gene expression compared to unperturbed cell cycle states. Here, we use an integrated approach to obtain G1, S and G2/M phases from mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) and to profile their chromatin accessibility and marks as well as steady and nascent transcripts levels. We demonstrate that synchronization with thymidine and nocodazole leads to dramatic changes in chromatin compaction and gene expression, which only partially resemble bona fide cell cycle-dependent differences. Blocking with CDK1 inhibitor results in efficient synchronization and evokes moderate changes in chromatin accessibility, resembling G2/M phase. Correlative analysis suggests that cell cycle-specific variations in chromatin openness in unperturbed mESCs are mediated by CDK1 substrates and CTCF. This integrated strategy can be applied to most cultured cell lines under any conditions and holds the potential to further our understanding of cell cycle-dependent susceptibility to external cues and chromatin regulation.
2021-12-31 | GSE167963 | GEO
Project description:Evaluation of cell cycle phase dependent transcriptional changes by single cell RNA-seq
| PRJNA913699 | ENA
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of pH-dependent cell cycle progression
| PRJNA608468 | ENA
Project description:Activity-dependent transcriptional changes in human neurons
| PRJNA313218 | ENA
Project description:Time-dependent transcriptional changes in neutrophil phenotype
| PRJNA397395 | ENA
Project description:Pioneer factor Pax7 initiates two-step cell-cycle dependent chromatin opening
| PRJNA1002266 | ENA
Project description:Hormone dependent uterine gene expression changes that occur during the estrous cycle suggest hormone receptor binding to chromatin may also be dynamic. Therefore, we employed a multi-faceted approach to examine in vivo dynamics of hormone receptor occupancy, chromatin accessibility and chromatin structure by combining RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, HiC-seq and ChIP-seq for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PGR). Genome wide, there were extensive estrous cycle dependent changes in ERα and PGR binding as well as chromatin accessibility. There were 4,159 differentially expressed genes between estrus and diestrus. At transcription start sites, accessibility generally correlated with the directionality of gene expression and there was reduced PGR in estrus compared to diestrus but little change in ERα. There were 2,727 enhancers with dynamic accessibility near these genes and 77% of those correlated with directionality of gene expression changes. However, most enhancers were constitutively open (8,694). In both dynamic and constitutively open enhancers, ERα and PgR binding was coordinately lost from diestrus to estrus. Diestrus specific ERα binding and accessible regions were enriched for PGR, FOX, GATA and SOX binding motifs. In contrast, estrus specific ERα binding occurred at transcription factor deserts in relatively closed chromatin while estrus specific accessible regions were highly enriched for ATF, ELF and ELK motifs. Rapid Immunoprecipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins (RIME) revealed many estrous cycle dependent partners of ERα (diestrus, 60; estrus, 24). PGR was found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus supporting coordinated binding of both receptors during diestrus. Two of the cohesin complex proteins, SMC1A and SMC3, were found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus; overlap of SMC1A with ERα confirmed this preferential interaction during diestrus. Additionally, HiC analysis showed more diestrus specific interactions than estrus (476 versus 263) suggesting the SMC1A/ ERα interactions have functional consequences on chromatin structure. Taken together, a complex series of interactions between hormone receptors, chromatin structure and accessibility orchestrate estrous cycle dependent changes in gene expression.
2024-08-01 | GSE234051 | GEO
Project description:Hormone dependent uterine gene expression changes that occur during the estrous cycle suggest hormone receptor binding to chromatin may also be dynamic. Therefore, we employed a multi-faceted approach to examine in vivo dynamics of hormone receptor occupancy, chromatin accessibility and chromatin structure by combining RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, HiC-seq and ChIP-seq for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PGR). Genome wide, there were extensive estrous cycle dependent changes in ERα and PGR binding as well as chromatin accessibility. There were 4,159 differentially expressed genes between estrus and diestrus. At transcription start sites, accessibility generally correlated with the directionality of gene expression and there was reduced PGR in estrus compared to diestrus but little change in ERα. There were 2,727 enhancers with dynamic accessibility near these genes and 77% of those correlated with directionality of gene expression changes. However, most enhancers were constitutively open (8,694). In both dynamic and constitutively open enhancers, ERα and PgR binding was coordinately lost from diestrus to estrus. Diestrus specific ERα binding and accessible regions were enriched for PGR, FOX, GATA and SOX binding motifs. In contrast, estrus specific ERα binding occurred at transcription factor deserts in relatively closed chromatin while estrus specific accessible regions were highly enriched for ATF, ELF and ELK motifs. Rapid Immunoprecipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins (RIME) revealed many estrous cycle dependent partners of ERα (diestrus, 60; estrus, 24). PGR was found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus supporting coordinated binding of both receptors during diestrus. Two of the cohesin complex proteins, SMC1A and SMC3, were found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus; overlap of SMC1A with ERα confirmed this preferential interaction during diestrus. Additionally, HiC analysis showed more diestrus specific interactions than estrus (476 versus 263) suggesting the SMC1A/ ERα interactions have functional consequences on chromatin structure. Taken together, a complex series of interactions between hormone receptors, chromatin structure and accessibility orchestrate estrous cycle dependent changes in gene expression.
2024-08-01 | GSE234061 | GEO
Project description:Hormone dependent uterine gene expression changes that occur during the estrous cycle suggest hormone receptor binding to chromatin may also be dynamic. Therefore, we employed a multi-faceted approach to examine in vivo dynamics of hormone receptor occupancy, chromatin accessibility and chromatin structure by combining RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, HiC-seq and ChIP-seq for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PGR). Genome wide, there were extensive estrous cycle dependent changes in ERα and PGR binding as well as chromatin accessibility. There were 4,159 differentially expressed genes between estrus and diestrus. At transcription start sites, accessibility generally correlated with the directionality of gene expression and there was reduced PGR in estrus compared to diestrus but little change in ERα. There were 2,727 enhancers with dynamic accessibility near these genes and 77% of those correlated with directionality of gene expression changes. However, most enhancers were constitutively open (8,694). In both dynamic and constitutively open enhancers, ERα and PgR binding was coordinately lost from diestrus to estrus. Diestrus specific ERα binding and accessible regions were enriched for PGR, FOX, GATA and SOX binding motifs. In contrast, estrus specific ERα binding occurred at transcription factor deserts in relatively closed chromatin while estrus specific accessible regions were highly enriched for ATF, ELF and ELK motifs. Rapid Immunoprecipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins (RIME) revealed many estrous cycle dependent partners of ERα (diestrus, 60; estrus, 24). PGR was found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus supporting coordinated binding of both receptors during diestrus. Two of the cohesin complex proteins, SMC1A and SMC3, were found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus; overlap of SMC1A with ERα confirmed this preferential interaction during diestrus. Additionally, HiC analysis showed more diestrus specific interactions than estrus (476 versus 263) suggesting the SMC1A/ ERα interactions have functional consequences on chromatin structure. Taken together, a complex series of interactions between hormone receptors, chromatin structure and accessibility orchestrate estrous cycle dependent changes in gene expression.
2024-08-01 | GSE234059 | GEO
Project description:Hormone dependent uterine gene expression changes that occur during the estrous cycle suggest hormone receptor binding to chromatin may also be dynamic. Therefore, we employed a multi-faceted approach to examine in vivo dynamics of hormone receptor occupancy, chromatin accessibility and chromatin structure by combining RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, HiC-seq and ChIP-seq for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PGR). Genome wide, there were extensive estrous cycle dependent changes in ERα and PGR binding as well as chromatin accessibility. There were 4,159 differentially expressed genes between estrus and diestrus. At transcription start sites, accessibility generally correlated with the directionality of gene expression and there was reduced PGR in estrus compared to diestrus but little change in ERα. There were 2,727 enhancers with dynamic accessibility near these genes and 77% of those correlated with directionality of gene expression changes. However, most enhancers were constitutively open (8,694). In both dynamic and constitutively open enhancers, ERα and PgR binding was coordinately lost from diestrus to estrus. Diestrus specific ERα binding and accessible regions were enriched for PGR, FOX, GATA and SOX binding motifs. In contrast, estrus specific ERα binding occurred at transcription factor deserts in relatively closed chromatin while estrus specific accessible regions were highly enriched for ATF, ELF and ELK motifs. Rapid Immunoprecipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins (RIME) revealed many estrous cycle dependent partners of ERα (diestrus, 60; estrus, 24). PGR was found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus supporting coordinated binding of both receptors during diestrus. Two of the cohesin complex proteins, SMC1A and SMC3, were found in complex with ERα during diestrus but not estrus; overlap of SMC1A with ERα confirmed this preferential interaction during diestrus. Additionally, HiC analysis showed more diestrus specific interactions than estrus (476 versus 263) suggesting the SMC1A/ ERα interactions have functional consequences on chromatin structure. Taken together, a complex series of interactions between hormone receptors, chromatin structure and accessibility orchestrate estrous cycle dependent changes in gene expression.
2024-08-01 | GSE234064 | GEO