Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Whapmagoostui-Kuujjuarapik

ABSTRACT: Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Whapmagoostui-Kuujjuarapik

PROVIDER: PRJNA714558 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil

Project description:The objective of this study was to identify the different functional genes involved in key biogeochemical cycles in the low Arctic regions. Understanding the microbial diversity in the Arctic region is an important step to determine the effects of climate change on these areas.

2021-03-11 | GSE168623 | GEO

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil

Project description:Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil

| PRJNA713293 | ENA

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Pond Inlet

Project description:The objective of this study was to identify the different functional genes involved in key biogeochemical cycles in thehigh Arctic regions. Understanding the microbial diversity in the Arctic region is an important step to determine the effects of climate change on these areas.

2021-03-17 | GSE168985 | GEO

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Whapmagoostui-Kuujjuarapik

Project description:The objective of this study was to identify the different functional genes involved in key biogeochemical cycles in the sub- Arctic regions. Understanding the microbial diversity in the Arctic region is an important step to determine the effects of climate change on these areas.

2021-03-16 | GSE168911 | GEO

Survey functional genes in Arctic marine sediment communities

Project description:Survey functional genes in Arctic marine sediment communities

| PRJNA483318 | ENA

Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Pond Inlet

Project description:Survey of Functional Genes in the Arctic Soil of Pond Inlet

| PRJNA714838 | ENA

microbial functional genes are fundamentally different from bacterial phylogenetic distributions in arctic soils

Project description:Understanding biological diversity and distribution patterns at multiple spatial scales is a central issue in ecology. Here, we investigated the biogeographical patterns of functional genes in soil microbes from 24 arctic heath sites using GeoChip-based metagenomics and principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM)-based analysis. Functional gene richness varied considerably among sites, while the proportions of each major functional gene category were evenly distributed. Functional gene composition varied significantly at most medium and broad spatial scales, and the PCNM analyses indicated that 14-20% of the variation in total and major functional gene categories could be attributed primarily to relatively broad-scale spatial effects that were consistent with broad-scale variation in soil pH and total nitrogen. The combination of variance partitioning and multi-scales analysis indicated that spatial distance effects contributed 12% to variation in functional gene composition，whereas environmental factors contributed only 3%. This relatively strong influence of spatial as compared to environmental variation in determining functional gene distributions contrasts sharply with typical microbial phylotype/species-based biogeographical patterns in the Arctic and elsewhere. Our results suggest that the distributions of soil functional genes cannot be predicted from phylogenetic distributions because spatial factors associated with historical contingencies are relatively important determinants of their biogeography.

2014-12-10 | GSE63927 | GEO

Toolik Field Station Arctic Alaska soil metaproteomics

Project description:These metaproteomic datasets are from active layer soil samples collected from the area of Toolik Field Station, Arctic Alaska, USA. These datasets are described and analyzed in the forthcoming paper, "Functional partitioning and vegetational variation among Arctic soil bacteria revealed by metaproteomics."

| MSV000084386 | MassIVE

Microarray analyses of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE17517: Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation GSE17532: RT-PCR analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation Refer to individual Series

2009-08-07 | E-GEOD-17533 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data