Aquatic vertebrate metagenome
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA816062 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Marine aquatic vertebrate eDNA 12S amplicon Metagenome
| PRJNA864636 | ENA
Project description:Here, we have collapsed multiple analysis problems into two coherent categories, signal detection and signal estimation and adapted linear-optimal solutions from signal processing theory. Our algorithms for detection (DFilter) and estimation (EFilter) extend naturally to integration of multiple datasets. In benchmarking tests, DFilter outperformed assay-specific algorithms at identifying promoters from histone ChIP-seq, binding sites from transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq and open chromatin regions from DNase- and FAIRE-seq data. EFilter similarly outperformed an existing method for predicting mRNA levels from histone ChIP-seq data (Spearman correlation: 0.81 - 0.89). We performed H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 ChIP-seq on e11.5 mouse forebrain and used DFilter and EFilter to predict promoters and developmental gene expression, uncovering plausible gene targets for SNPs associated with neurodevelopmental disorders.
2013-06-10 | GSE34073 | GEO
Project description:Here, we have collapsed multiple analysis problems into two coherent categories, signal detection and signal estimation and adapted linear-optimal solutions from signal processing theory. Our algorithms for detection (DFilter) and estimation (EFilter) extend naturally to integration of multiple datasets. In benchmarking tests, DFilter outperformed assay-specific algorithms at identifying promoters from histone ChIP-seq, binding sites from transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq and open chromatin regions from DNase- and FAIRE-seq data. EFilter similarly outperformed an existing method for predicting mRNA levels from histone ChIP-seq data (Spearman correlation: 0.81 - 0.89). We performed H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 ChIP-seq on e11.5 mouse forebrain and used DFilter and EFilter to predict promoters and developmental gene expression, uncovering plausible gene targets for SNPs associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Generated two histone modifiction ChiP-seq in developing embryo mouse forebrain and using them for making bioligical inferences
2013-06-10 | E-GEOD-34073 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Fish eDNA metabarcoding in Hokkaido, Japan
| PRJDB15014 | ENA
Project description:Vertebrate eDNA survey in nearshore marine environment
| PRJNA300857 | ENA
Project description:Background: RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript. Results: Independent Solexa/Illumina experiments containing technical replicates are analyzed. When coverage is low, large disagreements between technical replicates are apparent. Exon detection between technical replicates is highly variable when the coverage is less than 5 reads per nucleotide and estimates of gene expression are more likely to disagree when coverage is low. Although large disagreements in the estimates of expression are observed at all levels of coverage. Conclusions: Technical variability is too high to ignore. Technical variability results in inconsistent detection of exons at low levels of coverage. Further, the estimate of the relative abundance of a transcript can substantially disagree, even when coverage levels are high. This may be due to the low sampling fraction and if so, it will persist as an issue needing to be addressed in experimental design even as the next wave of technology produces larger numbers of reads. We provide practical recommendations for dealing with the technical variability, without dramatic cost increases.
2014-01-15 | GSE54068 | GEO
Project description:Background: RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript. Results: Independent Solexa/Illumina experiments containing technical replicates are analyzed. When coverage is low, large disagreements between technical replicates are apparent. Exon detection between technical replicates is highly variable when the coverage is less than 5 reads per nucleotide and estimates of gene expression are more likely to disagree when coverage is low. Although large disagreements in the estimates of expression are observed at all levels of coverage. Conclusions: Technical variability is too high to ignore. Technical variability results in inconsistent detection of exons at low levels of coverage. Further, the estimate of the relative abundance of a transcript can substantially disagree, even when coverage levels are high. This may be due to the low sampling fraction and if so, it will persist as an issue needing to be addressed in experimental design even as the next wave of technology produces larger numbers of reads. We provide practical recommendations for dealing with the technical variability, without dramatic cost increases.
2014-01-15 | GSE54067 | GEO