Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Long-term observational study of 19 full-scale anaerobic digesters - the bacterial domain

PROVIDER: PRJNA850790 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR21553000_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR21553000_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR21553100_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR21553100_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR21553300_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 526

Similar Datasets

Project description:Long-term observational study of 19 full-scale anaerobic digesters - the archaeal domain

| PRJNA850791 | ENA

Multi-level microbial fingerprinting in anaerobic digestion reveals consistent fingerprinting profiles

Project description:The anaerobic digestion microbiomes has been puzzling us since the dawn of molecular methods for mixed microbial community analysis. Monitoring of the anaerobic digestion microbiome can either take place via a holistic evaluation of the microbial community through fingerprinting or by targeted monitoring of selected taxa. Here, we compared four different microbial community fingerprinting methods, i.e., amplicon sequencing, metaproteomics, metabolomics and phenotypics, in their ability to reflect the full-scale anaerobic digestion microbiome. The phenotypic fingerprinting reflects a, for anaerobic digestion, novel, single cell-based approach of direct microbial community fingerprinting. Three different digester types, i.e., sludge digesters, digesters treating agro-industrial waste and dry anaerobic digesters reflected different operational parameters. The α-diversity analysis yielded inconsistent results, especially for richness, across the different methods. In contrast, β-diversity analysis resulted in comparable profiles, even when translated into phyla or functions, with clear separation of the three digester types. In-depth analysis of each method's features i.e., operational taxonomic units, metaproteins, metabolites, and phenotypic traits, yielded certain similar features yet, also some clear differences between the different methods, which was related to the complexity of the anaerobic digestion process. In conclusion, phenotypic fingerprinting is a reliable, fast method for holistic monitoring of the anaerobic digestion microbiome, and the complementary identification of key features through other methods could give rise to a direct interpretation of anaerobic digestion process performance.

2021-05-26 | PXD024788 | Pride

Foaming dynamics in full-scale WWTP anaerobic digesters

Project description:Foaming dynamics in full-scale WWTP anaerobic digesters

| PRJEB62757 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Sludge from full-scale anaerobic digesters Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA295894 | ENA

Metagenomes from full scale mesophilic anaerobic digesters in Denmark

Project description:Metagenomes from full scale mesophilic anaerobic digesters in Denmark

| PRJEB10929 | ENA

Project description:Microbial community in mesophilic full-scale food waste anaerobic digesters

| PRJNA741579 | ENA