Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Methanogenic enrichment amplicon library sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJNA851096 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR19782291_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19782291_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19782292_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19782292_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19782293_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 18

Similar Datasets

Project description:The 16S rRNA gene library of the methanogenic enrichment 1933

| PRJNA673732 | ENA

Project description:Black Sea methanogenic enrichment

| PRJNA868890 | ENA

Oleate-degrading enrichment cultures

Project description:Methanogenic and non-methanogenic oleate-degrading enrichment cultures

| PRJEB25834 | ENA

Project description:HO-5600 methanogenic enrichment culture

| PRJNA783292 | ENA

hydrocarbon metagenome

Project description:Methanogenic benzene-degrading enrichment cultures

| PRJDB10156 | ENA

Amplicon sequencing of a K562 cell line model with a patient-based t(3;8) translocation following CRISPR treatment

Project description:Genome editing was conducted on a t(3;8) K562 model to investigate the effects of deleting different modules or CTCF binding sites within the MYC super-enhancer. To check mutations after targeting with CRISPR-Cas9 we performed amplicon sequencing using the Illumina PCR-based custom amplicon sequencing method using the TruSeq Custom Amplicon index kit (Illumina). The first PCR was performed using Q5 polymerase (NEB), the second nested PCR with KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready mix (Roche). Samples were sequenced paired-end (2x 250bp) on a MiSeq (Illumina).

2021-07-26 | E-MTAB-9937 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A Whole-Cell Screening Platform for Discovering Cell Adhesion Molecules Enabling Programmable Bacterial Cell-Cell Adhesion

Project description:To identify cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) targeting bacterial membrane proteins within a synthetic bacteria-displayed nanobody library, we present a comprehensive whole-cell screening platform. This involves targeted amplicon sequencing to discover nanobodies targeting the natural adhesin, TraN. Furthermore, we employ deep mutational engineering to enhance the binding affinity of these nanobodies toward TraN.

2023-12-18 | GSE249103 | GEO

Amplicon Sequencing of gRNAs from Brunello CRISPR mutagenized HT29-DKO cells after live/dead selection with PeV-A1 and PeV-A2

Project description:HT29-DKO cells were stably transduced with lentiCas9-Blast (Addgene, #52962) and subsequently selected using Blasticidin. Then, 300 million HT29-DKO cells that constitutively express Cas9 were transduced with lentiGuide-Puro from the Brunello library at MOI 0.3. Cells were then selected with puromycin, expanded to 3 billion cells, and then pooled together and cryofrozen in aliquots. One hundred million cells were thawed constituting over 1000× genome coverage worth of mutagenized library. The cells were infecting with PeV-A1 or PeV-A2 at an MOI of 0.1. Virus-resistant colonies were harvested. The uninfected reference used was the unselected starting population. The unselected and selected cells were both processed with QIAamp DNA columns to purify the gDNA. A first round of PCR was used to amplify the guide RNA sequences encoded in the gDNA, followed by a second round of PCR to add the barcodes/adapters for amplicon sequencing. 2% agarose gels and a QIAquick gel extraction kit were used to purify the amplicons. The amplicons were then subjected to next-generation sequencing on a HiSeq instrument lane (Illumina) via Novogene.

2024-03-16 | E-MTAB-13894 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Appraisal of Whole Exome Sequencing Methods

Project description:<p>Next generation sequencing has aided characterization of genomic variation. While whole genome sequencing may capture all possible mutations, whole exome sequencing is more cost-effective and captures most phenotype-altering mutations. Initial strategies for exome enrichment utilized a hybridization-based capture approach. Recently, amplicon-based methods were designed to simplify preparation and utilize smaller DNA inputs. We appraised two hybridization capture-based and two amplicon-based whole exome sequencing methods, utilizing both Illumina and Ion Torrent sequencers, comparing on-target alignment, uniformity, and variant calling. While the amplicon methods had higher on-target rates, the hybridization capture-based approaches showed better uniformity. All methods identified many of the same single nucleotide variants, but each amplicon-based method missed variants detected by the other three methods and reported additional variants discordant with all three other technologies. Many of these potential false positives or negatives appear to result from limited coverage, low variant frequency, vicinity to read starts/ends, or the need for platform-specific variant calling algorithms. All methods demonstrated effective copy number variant calling when compared against a single nucleotide polymorphism array. This study illustrates some differences between various whole exome sequencing approaches, highlights the need for selecting appropriate variant calling based on capture method, and will aid laboratories in selecting their preferred approach.</p>

| phs000938 | dbGaP

Project description:Amplicon sequencing of enrichment culture

| PRJNA1134092 | ENA