Differences in gene expression in CP-A cells treated with acid and deoxycholic acid (DCA) and those without acid
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA898314 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Gene expression arrays were performed to compare gene expression differences between the control and pH 6.4 and DCA-exposed groups in CP-A cells.
2022-11-07 | GSE217263 | GEO
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE13376: Exposure of Barrett's associated adenocarcinoma cell lines SKGT4 to deoxycholic acid (DCA) GSE13378: Exposure of squamous esophageal cell line HET-1A to deoxycholic acid (DCA) Refer to individual Series
2010-03-02 | E-GEOD-13400 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The involvment of bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA) in gastro-esophageal reflux disease and subsequent Barrett’s metaplsia has been postulated. This study examines gene expression induced by exposure to DCA in esophageal cells and may be utilised in cross-comparisons with data derived from gene expression studies of Barrett’s esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma.
2010-02-20 | GSE13376 | GEO
Project description:The involvment of bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA) in gastro-esophageal reflux disease and subsequent Barrettâs metaplsia has been postulated. This study examines gene expression induced by exposure to DCA in esophageal cells and may be utilised in cross-comparisons with data derived from gene expression studies of Barrettâs esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma. SKGT4 cells were exposed to 300um DCA over 24 hours in duplicate experiments including matched timepoint controls. RNA samples were taken at 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours from DCA (DCA) exposed and resting (REST) timepoint controls.
2010-02-28 | E-GEOD-13376 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The involvment of bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA) in gastro-esophageal reflux disease and subsequent Barrettâ??s metaplsia has been postulated. This study examines gene expression induced by exposure to DCA in esophageal cells and may be utilised in cross-comparisions with data derived from gene expression studies of Barrettâ??s esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma. Additionally this study may be used to assess divergence in response to bile acids by comparisons with similar study performed in SKGT4 barrett''s assocaited adenocarcinoma cell line. HET-1A cells were exposed to 300um DCA over 24 hours in duplicate experiments including matched timepoint controls
2010-02-28 | E-GEOD-13378 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The involvment of bile acids such as deoxycholic acid (DCA) in gastro-esophageal reflux disease and subsequent Barrett’s metaplsia has been postulated. This study examines gene expression induced by exposure to DCA in esophageal cells and may be utilised in cross-comparisions with data derived from gene expression studies of Barrett’s esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma. Additionally this study may be used to assess divergence in response to bile acids by comparisons with similar study performed in SKGT4 barrett''s assocaited adenocarcinoma cell line.
2010-02-20 | GSE13378 | GEO
Project description:The major aetiological risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is gastroesophageal reflux. This study's aim was to identify genes involved in the celular response to reflux in vitro. The Barrettâ??s oesophagus cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5; 152 genes were up-regulated at 2 hours (91 at 6 hours) and 10 down-regulated at 2 hours (34 at 6 hours). 12 genes were identified and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Background and Aims: The major etiological risk factor for Barrettâ??s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma is gastro-esophageal reflux. This studyâ??s aim was to identify genes involved in the cellular response to components of reflux both in vitro and in patients with reflux-related disease. Methods: The Barrettâ??s cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. 12 genes of interest were analysed by Real Time PCR both in cell line and biopsies from 110 patients with non-erosive reflux disease, esophagitis, Barrettâ??s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Results: In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5. Of 12 genes analysed in biopsies, 10 were significantly different between the 4 groups with the largest change for anterior gradient homolog 2, which may modulate p53 function. This had highest expression in biopsies from Barrettâ??s esophagus (median gene fold change for Barrettâ??s esophagus versus non-erosive reflux disease, 411.2 (95% CI 290.5-682.7; p<0.01); esophageal adenocarcinoma versus non-erosive reflux disease 68.1 (20.5-161.4; p<0.01)). In addition 4 genes associated with development/differentiation were upregulated in Barrettâ??s biopsies compared to those from non-erosive reflux disease (SEL1L, MFNG, CRIP1 and EFNA1). Conclusions: Novel genes have been identified, whose expression is altered after acid and bile exposure in vitro and in biopsies from patients with reflux related diseases. These genes may have utility as biomarkers of response to reflux and should be assessed in prospective studies. Experiment Overall Design: The Barrett's oesophagus cell line CP-A hTERT was treated with a 15 minute exposure of acid (pH 4.5), a mixture of primary bile acids (pH 4.5) or deoxycholic acid (pH 4.5). RNA extraction occurred in treatment and non-treated cells at 2 hours and 6 hours. The treatments were performed in duplicate on 2 different days. RNA was compared in each treatment to each control at the relevant time points, in a 2 x 2 manner by using Affymetrex U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. Results of 12 genes were confirmed by Real Time PCR and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
2008-06-16 | E-GEOD-9768 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Deoxycholic acid (DCA) is a secondary bile acid produced by a small number of commensal species of bacteria present in the mammalian gut. Elevated DCA concentration correlates with disease states including colon cancer and cholesterol gallstones, but the associated mechanisms are not fully understood. Both primary and secondary bile acids are also capable of affecting gene expression through nuclear receptors such as FXR. To better understand the impact of a commensal-derived secondary bile acid on host metabolism we fed DCA to germ-free (GF) mice, which normally lack DCA, and compared the hepatic transcriptomes of bile acid fed GF mice to GF mice receiving a control diet, as well as to those of conventionally housed control animals. Interestingly, the feeding of DCA to GF mice, but not the feeding of cholic acid (CA) from which DCA is derived, results in an up-regulation of genes of cholesterol biosynthetic pathways. GF mice normally have elevated hepatic cholesterol compared to conventionally housed mice. Despite increase in the expression of cholesterol biosynthetic genes, the DCA fed GF mice showed a markedly decreased level of hepatic cholesterol equivalent to the hepatic cholesterol concentration of conventionally colonized animals. Total cholesterol in the serum was unaffected by DCA, but there was a decrease in the HDL lipoprotein fraction as well as an increase in the non-HDL lipoprotein fraction of the serum cholesterol. DCA, but not CA, is sufficient to modulate host lipoprotein metabolism. Taken together, these results suggests that a minor component of the gut microbiome has a significant impact on cholesterol homeostasis through secondary metabolism of bile acids and suggests a possible therapeutic intervention route through the microbial metabolic pathways. two mouse strains, three diets, one time point
2015-01-08 | E-GEOD-34730 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Deoxycholic acid (DCA) is a secondary bile acid produced by a small number of commensal species of bacteria present in the mammalian gut. Elevated DCA concentration correlates with disease states including colon cancer and cholesterol gallstones, but the associated mechanisms are not fully understood. Both primary and secondary bile acids are also capable of affecting gene expression through nuclear receptors such as FXR. To better understand the impact of a commensal-derived secondary bile acid on host metabolism we fed DCA to germ-free (GF) mice, which normally lack DCA, and compared the hepatic transcriptomes of bile acid fed GF mice to GF mice receiving a control diet, as well as to those of conventionally housed control animals. Interestingly, the feeding of DCA to GF mice, but not the feeding of cholic acid (CA) from which DCA is derived, results in an up-regulation of genes of cholesterol biosynthetic pathways. GF mice normally have elevated hepatic cholesterol compared to conventionally housed mice. Despite increase in the expression of cholesterol biosynthetic genes, the DCA fed GF mice showed a markedly decreased level of hepatic cholesterol equivalent to the hepatic cholesterol concentration of conventionally colonized animals. Total cholesterol in the serum was unaffected by DCA, but there was a decrease in the HDL lipoprotein fraction as well as an increase in the non-HDL lipoprotein fraction of the serum cholesterol. DCA, but not CA, is sufficient to modulate host lipoprotein metabolism. Taken together, these results suggests that a minor component of the gut microbiome has a significant impact on cholesterol homeostasis through secondary metabolism of bile acids and suggests a possible therapeutic intervention route through the microbial metabolic pathways.
2015-01-08 | GSE34730 | GEO
Project description:The major aetiological risk factor for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is gastroesophageal reflux. This study's aim was to identify genes involved in the celular response to reflux in vitro. The Barrett’s oesophagus cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5; 152 genes were up-regulated at 2 hours (91 at 6 hours) and 10 down-regulated at 2 hours (34 at 6 hours). 12 genes were identified and were subsequently assessed in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma Background and Aims: The major etiological risk factor for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma is gastro-esophageal reflux. This study’s aim was to identify genes involved in the cellular response to components of reflux both in vitro and in patients with reflux-related disease. Methods: The Barrett’s cell line, CP-A hTERT, was exposed to media with acid, deoxycholic acid or a primary bile salt mixture. RNA expression was compared with controls on Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. 12 genes of interest were analysed by Real Time PCR both in cell line and biopsies from 110 patients with non-erosive reflux disease, esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Results: In CP-A hTERT, the greatest number of changes in gene expression was observed after treatment with deoxycholic acid, pH 4.5. Of 12 genes analysed in biopsies, 10 were significantly different between the 4 groups with the largest change for anterior gradient homolog 2, which may modulate p53 function. This had highest expression in biopsies from Barrett’s esophagus (median gene fold change for Barrett’s esophagus versus non-erosive reflux disease, 411.2 (95% CI 290.5-682.7; p<0.01); esophageal adenocarcinoma versus non-erosive reflux disease 68.1 (20.5-161.4; p<0.01)). In addition 4 genes associated with development/differentiation were upregulated in Barrett’s biopsies compared to those from non-erosive reflux disease (SEL1L, MFNG, CRIP1 and EFNA1). Conclusions: Novel genes have been identified, whose expression is altered after acid and bile exposure in vitro and in biopsies from patients with reflux related diseases. These genes may have utility as biomarkers of response to reflux and should be assessed in prospective studies. Keywords: Acid (pH 4.5) and bile (mixture of primary bile salts or the secondary bile salt deoxycholic acid, both at pH 4.5) challenge to a Barrett's oesophagus cell line. RNA extraction at 2 and 6 hours. Comparison of treatment RNA to control (non-treatment) RNA,
2007-12-05 | GSE9768 | GEO