Novel transcriptomic signatures associated with premature kidney allograft failure
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA923707 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR23078800_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR23078800_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR23078801_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR23078801_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR23078802_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 160 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Prediction power of kidney allograft outcomes based on non-invasive assays is limited. Assessments of operational tolerance (OT) patients allow to identify transcriptomic signatures of true non-responders for construction of predictive models. In the discovery cohort, RNA sequencing was used to identify protective set of transcripts by comparison of 15 OT patients from TOMOGRAM Study (NCT05124444) with 14 chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CABMR) and 23 stable graft function ≥15 years (STA). Archetypal analysis and classifier performance of RNA sequencing data showed that OT is clearly distinguishable from CABMR, but similar to STA. Selected differentially expressed transcripts between OT and CABMR were used in validation cohort (n=396) to predict 3-year kidney allograft loss at 3 time-points using RT-qPCR. Based on significant transcripts in univariable analysis, 2 multivariable Cox models were created. 3-transcripts (ADGRG3, ATG2A and GNLY) model from POD 7 predicted graft loss with C C-statistics (C) 0.727 (95% CI, 0.638-0.820). Another 3-transcript (IGHM, CD5, GNLY) model from M3 predicted graft loss with C 0.786 (95% CI, 0.785-0.865). Combining 3-transcript model with eGFR at month 3 improved C-statistics to 0.860 (95% CI, 0.778-0.944) and 0.868 (95% CI, 0.790-0.944), respectively. The model based on DGF, acute rejection, HLA mismatch and eGFR reached similar performance (C 0.846). In conclusion, identification of transcripts distinguishing OT from CABMR allowed to construct models predicting premature graft loss. Predictive statistics of these models reach same performance as well known-clinical models. Identified transcripts reflect mechanisms of injury/repair and alloimmune response when assessed at day 7 or with a loss of protective phenotype when assessed at month 3.
2023-01-16 | GSE222889 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundThe power to predict kidney allograft outcomes based on non-invasive assays is limited. Assessment of operational tolerance (OT) patients allows us to identify transcriptomic signatures of true non-responders for construction of predictive models.MethodsIn this observational retrospective study, RNA sequencing of peripheral blood was used in a derivation cohort to identify a protective set of transcripts by comparing 15 OT patients (40% females), from the TOMOGRAM Study (NCT05124444), 14 chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CABMR) and 23 stable graft function patients ≥15 years (STA). The selected differentially expressed transcripts between OT and CABMR were used in a validation cohort (n = 396) to predict 3-year kidney allograft loss at 3 time-points using RT-qPCR.FindingsArchetypal analysis and classifier performance of RNA sequencing data showed that OT is clearly distinguishable from CABMR, but similar to STA. Based on significant transcripts from the validation cohort in univariable analysis, 2 multivariable Cox models were created. A 3-transcript (ADGRG3, ATG2A, and GNLY) model from POD 7 predicted graft loss with C-statistics (C) 0.727 (95% CI, 0.638-0.820). Another 3-transcript (IGHM, CD5, GNLY) model from M3 predicted graft loss with C 0.786 (95% CI, 0.785-0.865). Combining 3-transcripts models with eGFR at POD 7 and M3 improved C-statistics to 0.860 (95% CI, 0.778-0.944) and 0.868 (95% CI, 0.790-0.944), respectively.InterpretationIdentification of transcripts distinguishing OT from CABMR allowed us to construct models predicting premature graft loss. Identified transcripts reflect mechanisms of injury/repair and alloimmune response when assessed at day 7 or with a loss of protective phenotype when assessed at month 3.FundingSupported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic under grant NV19-06-00031.
| S-EPMC10480056 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining “molecular Banff” signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set here comprises a small validation batch of renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications plus control normal kidney samples from patients at Hôpital Tenon, Paris (second batch) that complements the first batch of 60 samples. We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Keywords: disease state analysis 4 renal allograft core biopsies for clinical indications with different histopathological diagnoses according to Banff'97 criteria and 2 normal kidney samples.
2009-02-24 | E-GEOD-9492 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining âmolecular Banffâ signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set comprises all renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications from patients at Hôpital Tenon, Paris (February 2003 until September 2004) and few respective patients from Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, and Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges, plus control normal kidney samples from Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (first batch). We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Experiment Overall Design: 47 renal allograft core biopsies for clinical indications with different histopathological diagnoses according to BANFF'97 criteria, and 13 normal kidney samples as controls.
2009-02-28 | E-GEOD-9489 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We explored a direct association between the kidney allograft phenotype and serum protein signatures. Time-matched samples of graft biopsies and blood serum were collected in a heterogenous cohort of kidney transplanted patients (n=15) for bulk RNA sequencing and proteomics, respectively.
2024-06-14 | GSE269931 | GEO
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining M-bM-^@M-^\molecular BanffM-bM-^@M-^] signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set comprises all renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications from patients at HM-CM-4pital Tenon, Paris (February 2003 until September 2004) and few respective patients from HM-CM-4pital BicM-CM-*tre, Paris, HM-CM-4pital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, and HM-CM-4pital Dupuytren, Limoges, plus control normal kidney samples from HM-CM-4pital Tenon, Paris, France (first batch). We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Keywords: disease state analysis Keywords: Expression profiling by array 16 renal allograft core biopsies for clinical indications with different histopathological diagnoses according to BANFF'97 criteria (additional samples associated with GSE9489)
2009-08-27 | E-GEOD-17861 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The study comprises various components: Samples TD: We aims to screen out different gene expression profile in donor biopsies after revascularization , We aims to predict renal allograft dysfunction early after transplantation. Samples AR, ATN, Tx: We aim to screen out different gene expression profile in acute rejection on the kidney. We aim to screen out different gene expression profile in acute tubular necrosis on the kidney. Results from the various study components can help to diagnose renal allograft dysfunction with different causes by distinct gene expression profile. Keywords: acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, donor biopsies, renal allograft dysfunction
2011-02-02 | GSE26578 | GEO
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining “molecular Banff” signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set here comprises a small validation batch of renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications plus control normal kidney samples from patients at Hôpital Tenon, Paris (second batch) that complements the first batch of 60 samples. We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Keywords: disease state analysis
2009-02-24 | GSE9492 | GEO
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining “molecular Banff” signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set comprises all renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications from patients at Hôpital Tenon, Paris (February 2003 until September 2004) and few respective patients from Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, and Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges, plus control normal kidney samples from Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (first batch). We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Keywords: disease state analysis
2009-02-24 | GSE9489 | GEO
Project description:Specific early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection is gaining importance in the current trend to minimize and individualize immunosuppression. Gene expression analyses could contribute significantly by defining “molecular Banff” signatures. Several previous studies have applied transcriptomics to distinguish different classes of kidney biopsies. However, the heterogeneity of microarray platforms, clinical samples and data analysis methods complicates the identification of robust signatures for the different types and grades of rejection. To address these issues, a comparative meta-analysis was performed across five different microarray datasets of heterogeneous sample collections from two published clinical datasets and three own datasets including biopsies for clinical indications, protocol biopsies, as well as comparative samples from non-human primates (NHP). This work identified conserved gene expression signatures that can differentiate groups with different histopathological findings in both human and NHP, regardless of the technical platform used. The marker panels comprise genes that clearly support the biological changes known to be involved in allograft rejection. A characteristic dynamic expression change of genes associated with immune and kidney functions was observed across samples with different grades of CAN. In addition, differences between human and NHP rejection were essentially limited to genes reflecting interstitial fibrosis progression. This data set comprises all renal allograft biopsies for clinical indications from patients at Hôpital Tenon, Paris (February 2003 until September 2004) and few respective patients from Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, and Hôpital Dupuytren, Limoges, plus control normal kidney samples from Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (first batch). We used microarrays to identify different gene expression signatures of renal allograft biopsies that can classify them according to different types of allograft rejection or CAN. Keywords: disease state analysis Keywords: Expression profiling by array
2009-08-28 | GSE17861 | GEO