Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts

ABSTRACT: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has not delivered the expected clinical benefit. Many previous re-analysis studies of embryos deemed aneuploid by FISH on day 3 have found a high degree of chromosomal normalcy at the blastocyst stage. While most have interpreted this as âself correction,â there remains a lack of evidence for such a phenomenon. A more comprehensive technique for 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening was utilised here to re-evaluate blastocysts previously diagnosed as abnormal by FISH and investigate possible self correction mechanisms, including extrusion or duplication of aneuploid chromosomes resulting in uniparental isodisomy (UPID), and preferential segregation of aneuploidy to the trophectoderm (TE). Embryos that developed to a morphologically normal blastocyst after an aneuploidy diagnosis by cleavage stage FISH were biopsed into 4 sections, 3 TE and 1 inner cell mass (ICM), and randomised for evaluation by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening (MA-PGD). Fifty-eight percent of blastocysts were euploid for all 24 chromosomes despite an aneuploid FISH result on day 3. Only 18% were consistent with the original FISH diagnosis, while the remaining 24% identified abnormalities that were different from the original FISH diagnosis. Abnormalities did not preferentially segregate to the TE and aneuploid chromosome extrusion or duplication resulting in UPID did not occur. Cleavage stage FISH is poorly predictive of aneuploidy in an embryo that develops into a morphologically normal blastocyst. Clinicians should consider re-evaluating embryos diagnosed as aneuploid by FISH that form morphologically normal blastocysts using a validated comprehensive 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening method. Affymetrix SNP arrays were processed according to the manufacturer's directions on DNA extracted from 50 cryopreserved blastocysts that were biopsied into 3 sections of trophectoderm and 1 inner cell mass section. Affymetrix SNP array analysis was successfully completed on 145 trophectoderm samples and 47 ICM samples from embryos, 8 lymphocyte samples from cell lines and 6 mixed male and female samples.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: Nathan Treff

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-18932 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Northrop L E LE Treff N R NR Levy B B Scott R T RT

Molecular human reproduction 20100517 8

Although selection of chromosomally normal embryos has the potential to improve outcomes for patients undergoing IVF, the clinical impact of aneuploidy screening by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been controversial. There are many putative explanations including sampling error due to mosaicism, negative impact of biopsy, a lack of comprehensive chromosome screening, the possibility of embryo self-correction and poor predictive value of the technology itself. Direct analysis of the ...[more]

PMID: 20479065

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aneuploidy has been well documented in blastocyst embryos, but prior studies have been limited in scale and/or lack mechanistic data. We previously reported preclinical validation of microarray 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in a 24-hour protocol. The method diagnoses chromosome copy number, structural chromosome aberrations, parental source of aneuploidy, and distinguishes certain meiotic from mitotic errors. In this study our objective was to examine aneuploidy in human blastocysts and determine correspondence of karyotypes between trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM). We disaggregated 51 blastocysts from seventeen couples into ICM and one or two TE fractions. The average maternal age was 31. Next, we ran 24-chromosome microarray molecular karyotyping on all of the samples, and then performed a retrospective analysis of the data. The average per-chromosome confidence was 99.95%. Approximately 80% of blastocysts were euploid. The majority of aneuploid embryos were simple aneuploid, i.e., one or two whole-chromosome imbalances. Structural chromosome aberrations, which are common in cleavage stage embryos, occurred in only three blastocysts (5.8%). All TE biopsies derived from the same embryos were concordant. Forty-nine of fifty-one (96.1%) inner cell mass (ICM) samples were concordant with TE biopsies derived from the same embryos. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in the two embryos with structural chromosome aberration. We conclude that trophectoderm karyotype is an excellent predictor of inner cell mass karyotype. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in embryos with structural chromosome aberrations. We thawed all fractions at 22°C, and then added Arcturus PicoPure Lysis Buffer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) to each of the biopsies. The tubes were incubated at 56°C for one hour, and then heat inactivated at 95°C for 10 minutes. DNA from the lysed biospsies was amplified using a commercial kit (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) for multiple displacement amplification (MDA). MDA reactions were incubated at 30°C for 2.5 hours and then heat-inactivated at 65°C for five minutes. The amplified samples were genotyped using Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) Infinium II genotyping microarrays (CytoSNP-12 chips) using a modified 24-hour protocol, as described previously*. Previously, we developed a genotyping microarray molecular karyotyping technology that uses parental genetic data to increase accuracy and determine mechanism and source of aneuploidy*. The algorithm uses parental genotypes and the observed distribution of unprocessed single cell microarray channel intensities to diagnose whole-chromosome imbalances and structural chromosome aberrations*. Because parental genotypes are available, the algorithm readily identifies parental source of whole-chromosome imbalances and structural chromosome aberrations. Additionally, the algorithm uses parental information, high confidence disomic single cell measurements on children, and recombination probabilities (genome.ucsc.edu) to determine the phase of the parental chromosomes. The phased data is then used to determine whether certain trisomies and uniparental disomies were mitotic or meiotic in origin*. *Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, Ross R, Alper M, Barrett B, Frederick J, Potter D, Behr B, Rabinowitz M. (2010). Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-hour protocol. Human Reproduction January 24 [Epub ahead of print].

Dataset Information

SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts

Publications

SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets