Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

44 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

S. cerevisiae L3262: Control vs. SPT15 multiple point mutant strains, Ets2 and Ets3

ABSTRACT: Transcriptional profiling of ethanol tolerant strains Ets2 and Ets3 comparing control Saccharomyces cerevisiae L3262 with ethanol tolerant strains Ets2 and Ets3, through screening a mutant library of SPT15 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae L3262. Four-condition experiment, L3262 vs. Ets2 or Ets3 strains. Biological replicates: 4 control, each 2 transfected(Ets2, Ets3), independently grown and harvested. One replicate per array.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

SUBMITTER: Hye Yun Moon

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-23965 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

S. cerevisiae L3262: Control vs. SPT15 multiple point mutant strains, Ets2 and Ets3

Project description:Transcriptional profiling of ethanol tolerant strains Ets2 and Ets3 comparing control Saccharomyces cerevisiae L3262 with ethanol tolerant strains Ets2 and Ets3, through screening a mutant library of SPT15 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae L3262.

2013-09-01 | GSE23965 | GEO

Ethanol cellular defense induce unfolded protein response in yeast

Project description:Ethanol is a valuable industrial product and a common metabolite used by many cell types. However, this molecule produces high levels of cytotoxicity affecting cellular performance at several levels. In the presence of ethanol, cells must adjust some of their components, such as the membrane lipids to maintain homeostasis. In the case of microorganism as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ethanol is one of the principal products of their metabolism and is the main stress factor during fermentation. Although many efforts have been made, mechanisms of ethanol tolerance are not fully understood and very little evidence is available to date for specific signaling by ethanol in the cell. This work studied two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, CECT10094 and Temohaya-26, isolated from flor wine and traditional fermentations respectively, which differ in ethanol tolerance, in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the ethanol stress response and the reasons for different ethanol tolerance. The transcriptome was analyzed after ethanol stress and, among others, an increased activation of genes related with the unfolded protein response (UPR) and its transcription factor, Hac1p, was observed in the tolerant strain CECT10094. We observed that this strain also resist more UPR agents than Temohaya-26 and the UPR-ethanol stress correlation was corroborated observing growth of 15 more strains and discarding UPR correlation with other stresses as thermal or oxidative stress. Furthermore, higher activation of UPR pathway in the tolerant strain CECT10094 was observed using a UPR mCherry reporter. Finally, we observed UPR activation in response to ethanol stress in other S. cerevisiae ethanol tolerant strains as the wine strains T73 and EC1118.

2016-02-03 | GSE44863 | GEO

Transcriptomic analysis of two ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae clones obtained by evolutionary engineering

2016-03-01 | GSE78759 | GEO

Responses to ethanol in haploid and diploid strain

Project description:Diploid and haploid strains often exhibit different tolerance to variety of stresses. Transcriptome of acclimation to ethanol stress in diploid and haploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analyzed. We analyzed transcriptome profiles of diploid and haploid strains in the presence of ethanol.

2010-01-30 | GSE20108 | GEO

Project description:Comparative genomic analysis of thermotolerant and ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

| PRJNA1131630 | ENA

Transcriptomic analysis of two ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae clones obtained by evolutionary engineering

Project description:Evolutionary engineering strategy was used for selection of ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae clones under gradually increasing ethanol stress levels. Clones B2 and B8 were selected based on their higher ethanol-tolerance and higher ethanol production levels. Whole genome microarray analysis was used for identifying the gene expression levels of these two evolved clones compared to the reference strain. Two evolved ethanol-tolerant strains B2 and B8, which were selected by evolutionary engineering under gradually increasing ethanol stress, were used for whole genome transcriptomic analysis in comparison with the reference strain. Cells were grown in yeast minimal media until they reach a final OD600 of 1. Following total RNA isolation, gene expression levels were analyzed using One-color microarray-based gene expression analysis (Agilent Technologies). Experiments were done in triplicates.

2016-03-01 | E-GEOD-78759 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparison of the transcriptional response to ethanol in laboratory and wild yeast strains

Project description:An S288c-derived lab strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has lower ethanol resistance than either the vineyard strain M22 or the oak strain YPS163. We performed a 60 minute time-course experiment in the presence of 5% ethanol and compared the transcriptional response to ethanol between strains. We additionally analyzed the time-point of maximal response (30 min.) in wild type cells, YPS163 msn2D, and YPS163 hap1D cells.

2010-12-17 | GSE22904 | GEO

Yeast transcriptomics in sugarcane-based ethanol fermentation

Project description:The present work aimed to compare the transcriptome of three major ethanol-producer Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in Brazil when fermenting sugarcane juice for fuel ethanol production. This was motivated by the reports presenting physiological and genomics differences among them, and by the attempt to identify genes that could be related to their fermentation capacity and adaptation for different industrial processes.

2012-11-27 | GSE42433 | GEO

Adapted Y-50049 vs. Wild type Y-12632 in response to furfural-HMF challenge

Project description:Transcriptional profiling of adapted tolerant industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-50049 compared with its parental wild type NRRL Y-12632 in response to challenge of furfural and HMF each at 20 mM. Y-50049 is able to detoxify toxic furan aldehydes in situ while produce ethanol. Under the same conditions, the wild type Y-12632 was repressed and unable to grow and function.

2020-12-31 | GSE131713 | GEO

Comparative Genomic Hybridization of S. cerevisiae industrial and laboratory strains

Project description:The environmental stresses and inhibitors encounted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are main limiting factors in bioethanol fermentation. Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the stresses-related phenotypes diversities within and between S. cerevisiae populations could guide the construction of yeast strains with improved stresses tolerance and fermentation performances. Here, we explored the genetic characteristics of the bioethanol S. cerevisiae strains, and elucidated the genetic variations correlated with its advantaged traits (higher ethanol yield under sever conditions and better tolerance to multiple stresses compared to an S288c derived laboratory strain BYZ1). Firstly, pulse-field gel electrophoresis combined with array-comparative genomic hybridization was used to compare the genome structure of industrial strains and the laboratory strain BYZ1.

2011-09-15 | GSE31872 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data