Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

Expression profiling of 4q-linked and phenotypic FSHD in different steps of myogenic differentiation

ABSTRACT: The specific gene(s) responsible for FSHD phenotype have not yet been identified. We used the Human GeneChip Exon 1.0 ST platform to analyze the global gene expression profiles of FSHD-1, FSHD-2 and controls during myogenic differentiation. In this dataset, we include the expression data of human primary myoblasts obtained from three FSHD-1 and two FSHD-2 patients, and three healthy controls (CN). This data are used to evaluate the molecular perturbation of FSHD upon muscle differentiation; we compared patients and CN proliferating myoblasts as well as the corresponding myotubes obtained after 8 days of cell differentiation. 16 expression profiles were generated from 6 different cell types: including myoblasts and myotubes from healthy donors and FSHD-1 and FSHD-2 patients. Gene probesets with P < 0.01 and FC > 2 were selected in FSHD-1 assay, whereas P < 0.001 and FC > 2 were used in FSHD-2, in the attempt to overcame problems due to the small sample size analyzed.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

SUBMITTER: raffaella meneveri

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-26061 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Expression profiling of FSHD-1 and FSHD-2 cells during myogenic differentiation evidences common and distinctive gene dysregulation patterns.

Cheli Stefania S François Stephanie S Bodega Beatrice B Ferrari Francesco F Tenedini Elena E Roncaglia Enrica E Ferrari Sergio S Ginelli Enrico E Meneveri Raffaella R

PloS one 20110613 6

<h4>Background</h4>Determine global gene dysregulation affecting 4q-linked (FSHD-1) and non 4q-linked (FSHD-2) cells during early stages of myogenic differentiation. This approach has been never applied to FSHD pathogenesis.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>By in vitro differentiation of FSHD-1 and FSHD-2 myoblasts and gene chip analysis we derived that gene expression profile is altered only in FSHD-1 myoblasts and FSHD-2 myotubes. The changes seen in FSHD-1 regarded a general defect in ce ...[more]

PMID: 21695143

Similar Datasets

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE21298: Profiling wt SOD versus ALS SOD1(G93A) mutant GSE21305: Profiling neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y with Paraquat treatment Mitochondrial dysfunction has been directly or indirectly implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). We used exon-sentive microarrays to characterize the responses to different mitochondrial perturbations in cellular models. We examined human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells treated with paraquat, a neurotoxic herbicide which both catalyzes the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induces mitochondrial damage in animal models, and SH-SY5Y cells stably expressing the mutant SOD1(G93A) protein, one of the genetic causes of ALS. We identified a common set of genes that have a deregulated transcription and alternative splicing in both models. Noticeably, pathway analysis revealed that the expression of a subset of genes involved in neuritogenesis and axon guidance is perturbed, suggesting that alterations of axonal function may descend directly from mitochondrial damage and be responsible for neurodegenerative conditions. Paraquat treatment on cell lines derived from human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y and the same cell line stably transfected with cDNAs coding for wild type SOD1 or ALS mutant SOD1 G93A was carried out as described in (Maracchioni et al. J Neurochem 2007, 100, 142-153). Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y untransfected or stably transfected with cDNAs coding for wild type SOD1 or the mutant SOD1(G93A) , were cultured in D-MEM/F-12 media with GlutaMAX™ (Gibco, Invitrogen, UK), 10% FBS, 100 Units/ml penicillin G, 100µg/ml streptomycin/ penicillin (Euroclone, Milano, Italy). Stably transfected cells were also maintained in the presence of 400µg/ml Geneticin (G418 sulphate, Euroclone). Cells were fed every 2–3 days and passed once a week. For the microarray experiment, after an initial amplification of each cell type [(SH-SY5Y; SOD1(WT), SOD1(G93A)], cells were aliquoted and cryopreservated in liquid nitrogen. For every experiment an aliquot of each cell line was thawed and seeded. After having reached confluence, cells were reseeded at 3x106cells in 100mm dish. Paraquat (N,N’-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium dichloride, Sigma-Aldrich) treatment was carried out as described in (Maracchioni et al. J Neurochem 2007, 100, 142-153). Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen), and subsequently purified using silica membrane spin columns from RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA quantity and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop® instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Total RNA integrity was assessed by using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and the RNA Integrity Number (RIN) was calculated. Each condition was replicated 5 times. After extraction and quality check 1.5 µg of total RNA was subjected to removal of ribosomal RNA following the procedure suggested by the manufacturer (Affymetrix). The resulting total RNA was then used to created the biotin-labeled library to be hybridized on GeneChip® Exon 1.0 ST human microarrays following the procedure described by the manufacturer (Affymetrix). The CEL files resulting from the hybridization were analyzed using oneChannelGUI 1.6.5 (Sanges et al. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 3406-3408). Exon and gene-level probeset summarization was done by mean of RMA and sketch quantile normalization. Gene-level differential expression: to assess differential expression at gene-level, we used an empirical Bayes method together with a false discovery rate (FDR) correction of the p-value Thus, the list of differentially expressed genes was generated using an FDR ≤ 0.05 together with an absolute log2(fold-change) threshold of 1. Exon-level analysis: an intensity filter was subsequently applied at gene-level to remove not expressed and low expressed genes, i.e. genes were retained for exon-level analysis if in all biological replication gene-level signal was greater than 5. Subsequently, only genes characterized to have at least two RNA isoforms annotated in Ensembl database were retained for further analysis. The Splicing Index value was calculated by taking the log2 ratio of the normalized exon intensity (NI) in Sample 1 and the NI in Sample 2. The normalized exon intensity (NI) is the ratio of the probe set intensity to the gene intensity. Alternative splicing events (ASEs) were detected as described in (Della Beffa et al. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 571).

Dataset Information

Expression profiling of 4q-linked and phenotypic FSHD in different steps of myogenic differentiation

Publications

Expression profiling of FSHD-1 and FSHD-2 cells during myogenic differentiation evidences common and distinctive gene dysregulation patterns.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets