Comparative genomic hybridization of human genomic DNA and nucleolus-associated DNA in HeLa cell line.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
SUBMITTER: Attila Nemeth
PROVIDER: E-MEXP-2403 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Keywords: other
2004-10-24 | GSE1599 | GEO
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3)
2004-10-24 | E-GEOD-1599 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Measuring the properties of endogenous cell proteins, such as expression level, subcellular localization and turnover rates, on a whole proteome level remains a major challenge in the post-genome era. Quantitative methods for measuring mRNA expression do not reliably predict corresponding protein levels and provide little or no information on other protein properties. Here we describe a combined pulse-labelling, spatial proteomics and data analysis strategy to characterize the expression, localization, synthesis, degradation and turnover rates of endogenously expressed, untagged human proteins in different subcellular compartments. Using quantitative mass spectrometry and SILAC, a total of 80,098 peptides from 8,041 HeLa proteins were quantified, and their spatial distribution between the cytoplasm, nucleus and nucleolus determined and visualised using specialised software tools developed in PepTracker. Using information from ion intensities and rates of change in isotope ratios, protein abundance levels and protein synthesis, degradation and turnover rates were calculated for the whole cell and for the respective cytoplasmic, nuclear and nucleolar compartments. Expression levels of endogenous HeLa proteins varied by up to seven orders of magnitude. The average turnover rate for HeLa proteins was approximately 20 hours. Turnover rate did not correlate with either molecular weight or net charge, but did correlate with abundance, with highly abundant proteins showing longer than average half-lives. Fast turnover proteins had overall a higher frequency of PEST motifs than slow turnover proteins but no general correlation was observed between amino or carboxy terminal amino acid identities and turnover rates. A subset of proteins was identified that exist in pools with different turnover rates depending on their subcellular localization. This strongly correlated with subunits of large, multi-protein complexes, suggesting a general mechanism whereby their assembly is controlled in a different subcellular location to their main site of function.
2015-12-01 | PXD003258 | Pride
Project description:We characterize the TERRA transcriptome at normal and TRF2-depleted telomeres by RNA-seq and we demonstrate that TERRA upregulation is occurring at all transcribed telomeres upon depletion of TRF2. RNA-sequencing of HeLa mRNA, 4 samples: with or without TERRA enrichment by IP (respectively "IP" and "input"), with or without TFR-2 knock-down (respectively "_T" and "_EV").
2014-10-31 | E-GEOD-56727 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:DNA binding profiling of endogenous HIF1A on proximal promoters in human HeLa cells exposed to 1% oxygen (hypoxia), using normoxic cells (21% oxygen) as reference.<br><br>Biological background: The Hypoxia Inducible Factor Family of transcription factors is proposed as the main orchestrator of the cellular response to hypoxia. HIFs are heterodimers of a HIF alpha and a HIF beta subunit. HIF alpha protein stability is regulated by oxygen-dependent proteasomal degradation, and hence HIFs are strongly stabilized in hypoxia.<br><br>Purpose of the study: a number of HIF1 ChIP-chip studies have been reported, employing various cell types, array platforms and HIF antibodies, and the overlap of HIF binding locations in these studies is relatively small. The aim of this study was to characterize HIF1 binding in an additional cell line (HeLa), and employing a different HIFalpha antibody.<br><br>Experimental design: We conducted a total of six hybridizations employing four biological replicates. For two biological replicates, we performed dye-swap technical replicate experiments.<br><br>Results summary: We identified 55 HIF binding locations in HeLa cells (FDR<2%). While this number is relatively low compared to previous studies, presumably due to limiting antibody sensitivity, the overlap with data from other cell lines is comparable to our HeLa data.
2012-05-20 | E-MEXP-3499 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ENCODE ChIP-chip study using 8 diverse human cell lines; 4 of neural origin (NB69, KELLY, SHSY-5Y, U373) and 4 of non-neural origin (HeLa, HepG2, HEK293 and K562) and anti-REST/NRSF antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech; sc-25398 aka H290) to asses REST-genome interactions across 1% of the human genome used in the pilot phase of the ENCODE project. Additionally the REST binding profile in K562 cells that had been transfected with REST specific siRNA oligos (72h and 96h) were determined revealing genomic in vivo binding affinity hierarchies for REST. Additionally the REST binding profile in K562 cells that had been transfected with REST specific siRNA oligos (72h and 96h) were determined
2009-03-31 | E-TABM-660 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with microarray analysis (ChIP-chip) was carried out to characterize Methyl-CpG binding sites and RNA Polymerase 2 and methylateed DNA regions. Experiments were done in Hela cells.
2011-03-19 | E-MEXP-2634 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Arabidopsis cell culture was treated with 300 µM iron-citrate. Samples were collected before (0), and 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after iron addition. A repetition was performed for 2 points of the time course: before and 30 min after iron addition. Samples are designed as follow: Exp 1: 0(1), 5, 15, 30(1) et 60. Exp 2: 0(2) et 30(2)
2007-04-19 | E-MEXP-799 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with microarray analysis (ChIP-chip) was carried out to identify new target genes for ETS-domain transcription factor Elk-1. Experiment was done in Hela cells under serum starved conditions.
2009-08-11 | E-MEXP-2084 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We have isolated, analyzed and compared the RNA content of various cell compartments including total RNA, nucleolplasmic RNA and nucleolar RNA. In addition, cells have been subjected to various treatment to specifically inhibit each of the RNA polymerases I, II and III, as well as protein synthesis. Cells were also treated with antisense oligos to induce the degradation of specific RNA transcripts. The whole RNA content of the cells after these specific treatments was isolated and sequenced.
2015-10-16 | E-MTAB-3460 | biostudies-arrayexpress