ChIP-seq of Danio rerio wild type and kdm4b mutant embryos to investigate kdm4b signaling
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Illumina HiSeq 2500
ORGANISM(S): Danio rerio
SUBMITTER: Yong Zhou
PROVIDER: E-MTAB-13114 | biostudies-arrayexpress |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress
Similar Datasets
Project description:Transcriptomic differences of gata1+ erythrocytes between the kdm4b-/- mutants and the WT embryos at 48 hpf were analyzed by RNA sequencing.
2024-07-01 | E-MTAB-13116 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We examined whether K non-rep and K rep sequences bind to different set of proteins by performing ChOP-mass spectrometry (ChOP-MS) in WT, K non-rep KO and K rep KO HEK293T cells, using lacZ probes as control.
2022-09-05 | PXD035996 | Pride
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells are one of the few central nervous system regenerative cells discovered so far. It is characterized by its lifelong nerve regeneration function, and it can also release a variety of neurotrophic factors and neural adhesion molecules. It is considered to be the glial cell with the strongest myelination ability. Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells have phenotypes in common, they can promote axon regeneration(R. Doucette, 1995). Olfactory ensheathing cells have the characteristics of Schwann cells and astrocytes, but the overall performance tends to be the former, which has two unique characteristics. First, it exists not only in the peripheral nerves (Schwann cells), but also in the central nervous system (astroglia); second, the olfactory mucosa has the ability to regenerate life-long, including human olfactory ensheathing cells(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000). Regeneration is a process in which olfactory ensheathing cells participate in efficient regulation, although the specific mechanism is not yet clear. Olfactory ensheathing cells are different from astrocytes and Schwann cells, but at the same time have the characteristics of these two cells(S. C. Barnett, 2004), like Schwann cells help axon growth, but more than Schwann cells It can make axons grow long distances, that is, it has stronger migration(A. Ramon-Cueto et al., 1998); there are also astrocytes that have a nutritional effect on the survival of neurons and the growth of axons, but olfactory ensheathing cells can also wrap neurons forms myelin sheath to support the growth of nerve processes(R. Devon and R. Doucette, 1992; J. Gu et al., 2019). There are two characteristics that make olfactory ensheathing cells the best choice for the treatment of neurological diseases(S. C. Chiu et al., 2009; J. Kim et al., 2018; M. Abdel-Rahman et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells are gradually used to treat spinal cord injuries and have shown amazing effects(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000; K. J. Liu et al., 2010; R. Yao et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells that have been used in research are usually derived from the olfactory bulb(E. H. Franssen et al., 2007), but it is easier to obtain olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory mucosa in clinical practice(M. Ryszard et al., 2006), so the difference between the olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and the olfactory mucosa There are more and more studies(B. M. U. et al., 2007), and previous studies have shown that they not only have many similar functions, but also have many differences(M. W. Richter et al., 2005; L. Wang et al., 2014; K. E. Smith et al., 2020). Because olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory bulb are not easy to obtain, olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory mucosa have become the focus of attention. Although we know that olfactory ensheathing cells from two sources have nerve repair functions, it is not clear why the two different sources of olfactory ensheathing cells have different therapeutic effects. Nicolas G. once studied that the genetic difference between the two cells and found that there are many genes related to wound repair and nerve regeneration(G. Nicolas et al., 2010). We have reason to guess that olfactory ensheathing cells from these two sources will also have a large difference in protein level. Our research group wants to use the current mature transcriptome and proteomic sequencing technologies to explore the difference between olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and olfactory mucosa, and explain why the two sources of olfactory ensheathing cells shows different therapeutic effects, hope to provide a new theoretical basis for future clinical treatment.
2022-02-16 | PXD024046 | Pride
Project description:As sex determines mammalian development, understanding the nature and developmental dynamics of the sexually dimorphic transcriptome is important. To explore this, we generated 72 genome-wide RNA-seq profiles from mouse eight-cell embryos, late gestation and adult livers, together with 4 ground-state pluripotent embryonic (ES) cell lines from which we generated both RNA-seq and multiple ChIP-seq profiles. We complemented this with previously published data to yield 5 snap-shots of pre-implantation development, late-gestation placenta and somatic tissue and multiple adult tissues for integrative analysis. We define a high-confidence sex-dimorphic signature of 56 genes in eight-cell embryos. Sex-chromosome-linked components of this signature are largely conserved throughout pre-implantation development and ES cells, whilst the autosomal component is more dynamic. Sex-biased gene expression is reflected by enrichment for activating and repressive histone modifications. The eight-cell signature is largely non-overlapping with that defined from fetal liver, neither was it correlated with liver or other adult tissues analysed. Fetal and adult liver gene expression signatures are also substantially different, yet a core set of common genes showing modest dimorphic expression was identified. Dramatic sex-specific expression of olfactory receptors was found in fetal liver. Sex-biased expression differences unique to adult liver were enriched for growth hormone-responsiveness. The majority of sex-chromosome based differences identified from eight-cell embryos are also present in placenta but not somatic tissue at the same gestational age. This systematic study identifies three distinct phases of sex dimorphism throughout mouse development, and has significant implications for understanding the developmental origins of sex-specific phenotypes and disease in mammals. ChIP seq of Es Cell
2015-05-26 | E-GEOD-59220 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:By using FloChIP’s “sample multiplex” mode, we ChIPed in parallel 5 histone marks (H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K4me1 and H3K9me3), going from chromatin to sequencing-ready libraries, in just one day.
2019-12-08 | E-MTAB-8551 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We provide ChIP-Seq analysis of Egr2 and Sox10 transcription factor binding in Schwann cells of rat peripheral nerve ChIP-Seq analysis of Egr2 and Sox10 binding in P15 rat sciatic nerve. Wiggle files of negative log of posterior probability determined by Mosaics.
2012-04-01 | E-GEOD-35132 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:By using FloChIP’s in sequential chip mode, we ChIPped multiple histone marks and re-ChIPped h3k27me3 and h3k4me3, in just one day.
2019-11-25 | E-MTAB-7186 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2015-05-26 | E-GEOD-59222 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The dysregulation of exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) play a crucial role in the development and progression of cancer. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in serum exosomes of GC patients and healthy individuals using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics.
2023-11-01 | E-MTAB-12763 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Investigation of the co-occurance of the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1 and the histone modification H3K9me3 in the genome of PGK12.1 XX ES cells. ChIP-seq of endogenous SMARCAD1 was carried out in control and SMARCAD1-knockdown ES cells using a double crosslinking procedure. Additionally, H3K9me3 ChIP-seq was performed in double-cross linked control PGK12.1 XX cells. Input samples and precipitates with an IgG antibody were sequenced (Illumina HiSeq1500) as controls. Antibodies used were SMARCAD1 PAB15737 (Abnova) and H3K9me3 ab8898 (abcam).
2019-02-17 | E-MTAB-7012 | biostudies-arrayexpress