Dataset Information

How many times should we repeat measurements of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for evaluating hepatic steatosis?

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to determine the number of times the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) should be measured during the evaluation of hepatic steatosis.

Methods

Patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent two UGAP repetition protocols (six-repetition [UGAP_6] and 12-repetition [UGAP_12]) and measurement of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) using transient elastography between October 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled. The mean attenuation coefficient (AC), interquartile range (IQR)/median, and coefficient of variance (CV) of the two repetition protocols were compared using the paired t test. Moreover, the diagnostic performances of UGAP_6 and UGAP_12 were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, considering the CAP value as a reference standard.

Results

The study included 160 patients (100 men; mean age, 50.9 years). There were no significant differences between UGAP_6 and UGAP_12 (0.731±0.116 dB/cm/MHz vs. 0.734±0.113 dB/cm/MHz, P=0.156) and mean CV (7.6±0.3% vs. 8.0±0.3%, P=0.062). However, the mean IQR/median of UGAP_6 was significantly lower than that of UGAP_12 (8.9%±6.0% vs. 9.8%±5.2%, P=0.012). In diagnosing the hepatic steatosis stage, UGAP_6 and UGAP_12 yielded comparable AUROCs (≥S1, 0.908 vs. 0.897, P=0.466; ≥S2, 0.883 vs. 0.897, P=0.126; S3, 0.832 vs. 0.834, P=0.799).

Conclusion

UGAP had high diagnostic performance in diagnosing hepatic steatosis, regardless of the number of repetitions (six repetitions vs. 12 repetitions), with maintained reliability. Therefore, six UGAP measurements seem sufficient for evaluating hepatic steatosis using UGAP.

SUBMITTER: Seo DM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10071056 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

How many times should we repeat measurements of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for evaluating hepatic steatosis?

Seo Duck Min DM Lee Sang Min SM Park Ji Won JW Kim Min-Jeong MJ Ha Hong Il HI Park Sun-Young SY Lee Kwanseop K

Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) 20221031 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>This retrospective study aimed to determine the number of times the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) should be measured during the evaluation of hepatic steatosis.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent two UGAP repetition protocols (six-repetition [UGAP_6] and 12-repetition [UGAP_12]) and measurement of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) using transient elastography between October 2020 and June 2021 were enrol ...[more]

PMID: 36935602

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsWe investigated the usefulness of combining two-dimensional shear wave elastography and the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for assessing the risk of progressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, defined as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of ≥4 and a fibrosis stage of ≥2.MethodsThis prospective study included 202 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent two-dimensional shear wave elastography, ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter, vibration-controlled transient elastography, the controlled attenuation parameter, and liver biopsy on the same day. Patients were grouped according to liver stiffness measurement using two-dimensional shear wave elastography and the attenuation coefficient, assessed using the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter: A, low liver stiffness measurement/low attenuation coefficient; B, low liver stiffness measurement/high attenuation coefficient; C, high liver stiffness measurement/low attenuation coefficient; and D, high liver stiffness measurement/high attenuation coefficient.ResultsTwo-dimensional shear wave elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography had equivalent diagnostic performance for fibrosis. The areas under the curve of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for identifying steatosis grades ≥S1, ≥S2, and S3 were 0.89, 0.91, and 0.92, respectively, which were significantly better than those of the controlled attenuation parameter (P<0.05). The percentages of progressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Groups A, B, C, and D were 0.0%, 7.7%, 35.7%, and 50.0%, respectively (P<0.001). The prediction model was established as logit (p) = 0.5414 × liver stiffness measurement (kPa) + 7.791 × attenuation coefficient (dB/cm/MHz)-8.401, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.832, 80.9%, and 74.6%, respectively; there was no significant difference from the FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase score.ConclusionCombined assessment by two-dimensional shear wave elastography and the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter is useful for risk stratification of progressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and may be convenient for evaluating the necessity of specialist referral and liver biopsy.

Project description:Background Ultrasound attenuation analysis (USAT) is a type of novel ultrasound attenuation imaging that can be used to detect hepatic steatosis based on the attenuation coefficient. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for assessing the severity of liver steatosis by USAT using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as a reference in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infections. Methods In total, 326 consecutive subjects with or without chronic liver diseases were enrolled in this study who underwent CAP examination and USAT to evaluate hepatic steatosis from October 2022 to November 2022 at The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Hepatic steatosis stage (S) was determined by CAP according to the following cut-off values recommended by the manufacturer: S ≥ S1 (≥11%, mild): 238 dB/m; S ≥ S2 (≥34%, moderate): 259 dB/m; and S ≥ S3 (≥67%, severe): 292 dB/m, and thus the optimal cut-off values for the USAT were acquired. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the categories of steatosis were used to measure the diagnostic accuracy of USAT. Results A total of 296 patients were recruited, including 101 (34.1%) patients with NAFLD, 172 (58.1%) with CHB and the remainder were healthy control subjects (7.8%). We used the CAP as the reference standard and found that the USAT increased gradually as the stage of steatosis increased (P<0.001). A strong positive correlation was found between USAT and CAP (r=0.787, P<0.001). In the whole population, the AUROCs of the USAT for S ≥ S1, S ≥ S2 and S ≥ 3 were 0.89, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively, and the cut-off values according to the Youden index for S ≥ S1, S ≥ S2, and S ≥ 3 were 0.62, 0.66, and 0.72 dB/cm/MHz, respectively. Our study showed that the USAT had a good ability to detect hepatic steatosis in NAFLD and CHB patients. Conclusions USAT had a strong association with CAP and a good diagnostic capability in the detection of hepatic steatosis, which appears to be a promising tool for the non-invasive detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis.

Project description:PurposeTo assess the performance and the reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with biopsy-proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).MethodsThis study included consecutive adult patients with MASLD who underwent ultrasound with UGAP, 2D-SWE and percutaneous liver biopsy. The median values of 12 consecutive UGAP measurements were acquired by two independent radiologists (R1 and R2). Hepatic steatosis was graded by liver biopsy as: (0) < 5%; (1) 5-33%; (2) > 33-66%; (3) > 66%. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsA hundred patients (median age 55.0 years old) with MASLD were prospectively enrolled. At histopathology, 70 and 42 patients had grade ≥ 2 and 3 steatosis, respectively. Median UGAP was 0.78 dB/cm/MHz (IQR/Med: 5.55%). For the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, the AUCs of UGAP were 0.828 (95% CI: 0.739, 0.896) for R1 and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.856) for R2. The inter- and intra-operator reliability of UGAP were excellent, with an ICC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. The median liver stiffness was 6.76 kPa (IQR/Med: 16.30%). For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.934), and the optimal cutoff value was > 6.75 kPa with a sensitivity of 80.6% and a specificity of 75.7%.ConclusionUGAP and 2D-SWE provide a good performance for the staging of steatosis and fibrosis in patients with MASLD with an excellent intra-operator reliability of UGAP.Key pointsQuestion How well do ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) perform for quantifying hepatic steatosis and fibrosis? Findings UGAP had a maximum AUC of 0.828 for the diagnosis of grade ≥ 2 steatosis, and 2D-SWE had an AUC of 0.862 for diagnosing advanced fibrosis. Clinical relevance UGAP and 2D-SWE allow rapid, reproducible, and accurate quantification of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis that can be used for the noninvasive assessment of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Dataset Information

How many times should we repeat measurements of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for evaluating hepatic steatosis?

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

How many times should we repeat measurements of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for evaluating hepatic steatosis?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets