Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Importance of Central Imaging Review in a Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Trial Using Positron Emission Tomography Response Adapted Radiation Therapy.


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We investigated the effects of central review of the interim fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scan response (iPET) assessment on treatment allocation in the risk-based, response-adapted, Children's Oncology Group study AHOD1331 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02166463) for pediatric patients with high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma.

Methods and materials

Per protocol, after 2 cycles of systemic therapy, patients underwent iPET, with visual response assessment by 5-point Deauville score (DS) at their treating institution and a real-time central review, with the latter considered the reference standard. An area of disease with a DS of 1 to 3 was considered a rapid-responding lesion, whereas a DS of 4 to 5 was considered a slow-responding lesion (SRL). Patients with 1 or more SRLs were considered iPET positive, whereas patients with only rapid-responding lesions were considered iPET negative. We conducted a predefined exploratory evaluation of concordance in iPET response assessment between institutional and central reviews of 573 patients. The concordance rate was evaluated using the Cohen κ statistic (κ > 0.80 was considered very good agreement and κ > 0.60-0.80, good agreement).

Results

The concordance rate (514 of 573 [89.7%]) had a κ of 0.685 (95% CI, 0.610-0.759), consistent with good agreement. In terms of the direction of discordance, among the 126 patients who were considered iPET positive by institutional review, 38 (30.2%) were categorized as iPET negative by central review, preventing overtreatment with radiation therapy. Conversely, among the 447 patients who were considered iPET negative by institutional review, 21 patients (4.7%) were categorized as iPET positive by the central review and would have been undertreated without radiation therapy.

Conclusions

Central review is integral to PET response-adapted clinical trials for children with Hodgkin lymphoma. Continued support of central imaging review and education about DS are needed.

SUBMITTER: Hoppe BS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10363760 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Importance of Central Imaging Review in a Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Trial Using Positron Emission Tomography Response Adapted Radiation Therapy.

Hoppe Bradford S BS   McCarten Kathleen M KM   Pei Qinglin Q   Kessel Sandy S   Alazraki Adina A   Mhlanga Joyce C JC   Lai Hollie A HA   Eutsler Eric E   Hodgson David C DC   Roberts Kenneth B KB   Charpentier Anne-Marie AM   Keller Frank G FG   Voss Stephan D SD   Wu Yue Y   Cho Steve Y SY   Kelly Kara M KM   Castellino Sharon M SM  

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 20230302 5


<h4>Purpose</h4>We investigated the effects of central review of the interim fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scan response (iPET) assessment on treatment allocation in the risk-based, response-adapted, Children's Oncology Group study AHOD1331 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02166463) for pediatric patients with high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>Per protocol, after 2 cycles of systemic therapy, patients underwent iPET, wit  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9928671 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3021845 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5308126 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7422924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6649837 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4966513 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6667466 | biostudies-literature
2015-02-09 | E-MTAB-3175 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC8248935 | biostudies-literature
2011-11-01 | GSE21217 | GEO