Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.


ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine-carboplatin (gem-carbo) versus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis).

Methods

We identified 1865 patients treated at 19 centers between 2000 and 2013. Patients were included if they had received ≥ 3 cycles of neoadjuvant (cT2-4aN0M0) or induction (cTanyN + M0) gem-carbo or gem-cis followed by RC.

Results

We included 747 patients treated with gem-carbo (n = 147) or gem-cis (n = 600). Patients treated with gem-carbo had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.016) and more clinically node-positive disease (32% versus 20%; p = 0.013). The complete pathological response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate did not significantly differ between gem-carbo and gem-cis (20.7% versus 22.1%; p = 0.73). Chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly associated with pCR (OR 0.99 [95%CI 0.61-1.59]; p = 0.96), overall survival (OS) (HR 1.20 [95%CI 0.85-1.67]; p = 0.31), or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.35 [95%CI 0.93-1.96]; p = 0.11). Median OS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.6 months (95%CI 18.1-39.1) and 45.1 months (95%CI 32.7-57.6) (p = 0.18), respectively. Median CSS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.8 months (95%CI 9.8-47.8) and 71.0 months (95%CI median not reached) (p = 0.02), respectively. Subanalyses of the neoadjuvant and induction setting did not show significant survival differences.

Conclusion

Our results show that a subset of cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC achieve pCR on gem-carbo and that survival outcomes seem comparable to gem-cis provided patients are able to receive ≥ 3 cycles and undergo RC.

SUBMITTER: Einerhand SMH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10874219 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Einerhand Sarah M H SMH   Black Anna J AJ   Zargar Homayoun H   Fairey Adrian S AS   Dinney Colin P CP   Mir Maria C MC   Krabbe Laura-Maria LM   Cookson Michael S MS   Jacobson Niels-Erik NE   Montgomery Jeffrey S JS   Vasdev Nikhil N   Yu Evan Y EY   Xylinas Evanguelos E   Kassouf Wassim W   Dall'Era Marc A MA   Sridhar Srikala S SS   McGrath Jonathan S JS   Aning Jonathan J   Shariat Shahrokh F SF   Wright Jonathan L JL   Thorpe Andrew C AC   Morgan Todd M TM   Holzbeierlein Jeff M JM   Bivalacqua Trinity J TJ   North Scott S   Barocas Daniel A DA   Lotan Yair Y   Grivas Petros P   Garcia Jorge A JA   Stephenson Andrew J AJ   Shah Jay B JB   Daneshmand Siamak S   Zargar-Shoshtari Kamran K   Spiess Philippe E PE   van Rhijn Bas W G BWG   Black Peter C PC   Mertens Laura S LS  

World journal of urology 20220928 11


<h4>Purpose</h4>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine-carboplatin (gem-carbo) versus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis).<h4>Methods</h4>We identified 1865 patients treated at 19 centers between 2000 and 2013. Patients were included if they had rece  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8478388 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8902424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6049398 | biostudies-literature
2008-01-12 | GSE8465 | GEO
| S-EPMC9797229 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11308648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6858971 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5627306 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10314306 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10783357 | biostudies-literature