Dataset Information

Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins.

ABSTRACT: Every residue of the 101-aa Escherichia coli toxin CcdB was substituted with Ala, Asp, Glu, Lys, and Arg by using site-directed mutagenesis. The activity of each mutant in vivo was characterized as a function of Controller of Cell Division or Death B protein (CcdB) transcriptional level. The mutation data suggest that an accessibility value of 5% is an appropriate cutoff for definition of buried residues. At all buried positions, introduction of Asp results in an inactive phenotype at all CcdB transcriptional levels. The average amount of destabilization upon substitution at buried positions decreases in the order Asp>Glu>Lys>Arg>Ala. Asp substitutions at buried sites in two other proteins, maltose-binding protein and thioredoxin, also were shown to be severely destabilizing. Ala and Asp scanning mutagenesis, in combination with dose-dependent expression phenotypes, was shown to yield important information on protein structure and activity. These results also suggest that such scanning mutagenesis data can be used to rank order sequence alignments and their corresponding homology models, as well as to distinguish between correct and incorrect structural alignments. With continuous reductions in oligonucleotide costs and increasingly efficient site-directed mutagenesis procedures, comprehensive scanning mutagenesis experiments for small proteins/domains are quite feasible.

SUBMITTER: Bajaj K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1283427 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins.

Bajaj Kanika K Chakrabarti Purbani P Varadarajan Raghavan R

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20051026 45

Every residue of the 101-aa Escherichia coli toxin CcdB was substituted with Ala, Asp, Glu, Lys, and Arg by using site-directed mutagenesis. The activity of each mutant in vivo was characterized as a function of Controller of Cell Division or Death B protein (CcdB) transcriptional level. The mutation data suggest that an accessibility value of 5% is an appropriate cutoff for definition of buried residues. At all buried positions, introduction of Asp results in an inactive phenotype at all CcdB t ...[more]

PMID: 16251276

Similar Datasets

Project description:Effective encoding of residue contact information is crucial for protein structure prediction since it has a unique role to capture long-range residue interactions compared to other commonly used scoring terms. The residue contact information can be incorporated in structure prediction in several different ways: It can be incorporated as statistical potentials or it can be also used as constraints in ab initio structure prediction. To seek the most effective definition of residue contacts for template-based protein structure prediction, we evaluated 45 different contact definitions, varying bases of contacts and distance cutoffs, in terms of their ability to identify proteins of the same fold.We found that overall the residue contact pattern can distinguish protein folds best when contacts are defined for residue pairs whose C? atoms are at 7.0 Å or closer to each other. Lower fold recognition accuracy was observed when inaccurate threading alignments were used to identify common residue contacts between protein pairs. In the case of threading, alignment accuracy strongly influences the fraction of common contacts identified among proteins of the same fold, which eventually affects the fold recognition accuracy. The largest deterioration of the fold recognition was observed for ?-class proteins when the threading methods were used because the average alignment accuracy was worst for this fold class. When results of fold recognition were examined for individual proteins, we found that the effective contact definition depends on the fold of the proteins. A larger distance cutoff is often advantageous for capturing spatial arrangement of the secondary structures which are not physically in contact. For capturing contacts between neighboring ? strands, considering the distance between C? atoms is better than the C?-based distance because the side-chain of interacting residues on ? strands sometimes point to opposite directions.Residue contacts defined by C?-C? distance of 7.0 Å work best overall among tested to identify proteins of the same fold. We also found that effective contact definitions differ from fold to fold, suggesting that using different residue contact definition specific for each template will lead to improvement of the performance of threading.

Dataset Information

Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins.

Publications

Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets