Dataset Information

Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

ABSTRACT: rRNA-based studies, which have become the most common method for assessing microbial communities, rely upon faithful amplification of the corresponding genes from the original DNA sample. We report here an analysis and reevaluation of commonly used primers for amplifying the DNA between positions 27 and 1492 of bacterial 16S rRNA genes (numbered according to the Escherichia coli rRNA). We propose a formulation for a forward primer (27f) that includes three sequences not usually present. We compare our proposed formulation to two common alternatives by using linear amplification-providing an assessment that is independent of a reverse primer-and in combination with the 1492 reverse primer (1492r) under the PCR conditions appropriate for making community rRNA gene clone libraries. For analyses of DNA from human vaginal samples, our formulation was better at maintaining the original rRNA gene ratio of Lactobacillus spp. to Gardnerella spp., particularly under stringent amplification conditions. Because our 27f formulation remains relatively simple, having seven distinct primer sequences, there is minimal loss of overall amplification efficiency and specificity.

SUBMITTER: Frank JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2293150 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

Frank Jeremy A JA Reich Claudia I CI Sharma Shobha S Weisbaum Jon S JS Wilson Brenda A BA Olsen Gary J GJ

Applied and environmental microbiology 20080222 8

rRNA-based studies, which have become the most common method for assessing microbial communities, rely upon faithful amplification of the corresponding genes from the original DNA sample. We report here an analysis and reevaluation of commonly used primers for amplifying the DNA between positions 27 and 1492 of bacterial 16S rRNA genes (numbered according to the Escherichia coli rRNA). We propose a formulation for a forward primer (27f) that includes three sequences not usually present. We compa ...[more]

PMID: 18296538

Similar Datasets

Project description:The bacterial microbiome of human body sites, previously considered sterile, remains highly controversial because it can be challenging to isolate signal from noise when low-biomass samples are being analyzed. We tested the hypothesis that stochastic sequencing noise, separable from reagent contamination, is generated during sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform when DNA input is below a critical threshold. We first purified DNA from serial dilutions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and from negative controls using three DNA purification kits, quantified input using droplet digital PCR, and then sequenced the 16S rRNA gene in four technical replicates. This process identified reproducible contaminant signal that was separable from an irreproducible stochastic noise, which occurred as bacterial biomass of samples decreased. This approach was then applied to authentic respiratory samples from healthy individuals (n = 22) that ranged from high to ultralow bacterial biomass. Using oral rinse, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and matched controls, we were able to demonstrate (i) that stochastic noise dominates sequencing in real-world low-bacterial-biomass samples that contain fewer than 104 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per sample, (ii) that critical examination of the community composition of technical replicates can be used to separate signal from noise, and (iii) that EBC is an irreproducible sampling modality for sampling the microbiome of the lower airways. We anticipate that these results combined with suggested methods for identifying and dealing with noisy communities will facilitate increased reproducibility while simultaneously permitting characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities.IMPORTANCE DNA contamination from external sources (reagents, environment, operator, etc.) has long been assumed to be the main cause of spurious signals that appear under low-bacterial-biomass conditions. Here, we demonstrate that contamination can be separated from another, random signal generated during low-biomass-sample sequencing. This stochastic noise is not reproduced between technical replicates; however, results for any one replicate taken alone could look like a microbial community different from the controls. Using this information, we investigated respiratory samples from healthy humans and determined the narrow range of bacterial biomass where samples transition from producing reproducible microbial sequences to ones dominated by noise. We present a rigorous approach to studies involving low-bacterial-biomass samples to detect this source of noise and provide a framework for deciding if a sample is likely to be dominated by noise. We anticipate that this work will facilitate increased reproducibility in the characterization of potentially important low-biomass communities.

Project description:Microbial communities of the Arctic Ocean are poorly characterized in comparison to other aquatic environments as to their horizontal, vertical, and temporal turnover. Yet, recent studies showed that the Arctic marine ecosystem harbors unique microbial community members that are adapted to harsh environmental conditions, such as near-freezing temperatures and extreme seasonality. The gene for the small ribosomal subunit (16S rRNA) is commonly used to study the taxonomic composition of microbial communities in their natural environment. Several primer sets for this marker gene have been extensively tested across various sample sets, but these typically originated from low-latitude environments. An explicit evaluation of primer-set performances in representing the microbial communities of the Arctic Ocean is currently lacking. To select a suitable primer set for studying microbiomes of various Arctic marine habitats (sea ice, surface water, marine snow, deep ocean basin, and deep-sea sediment), we have conducted a performance comparison between two widely used primer sets, targeting different hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 and V4-V5). We observed that both primer sets were highly similar in representing the total microbial community composition down to genus rank, which was also confirmed independently by subgroup-specific catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) counts. Each primer set revealed higher internal diversity within certain bacterial taxonomic groups (e.g., the class Bacteroidia by V3-V4, and the phylum Planctomycetes by V4-V5). However, the V4-V5 primer set provides concurrent coverage of the archaeal domain, a relevant component comprising 10-20% of the community in Arctic deep waters and the sediment. Although both primer sets perform similarly, we suggest the use of the V4-V5 primer set for the integration of both bacterial and archaeal community dynamics in the Arctic marine environment.

Dataset Information

Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

Publications

Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets